Page 3 of 3
Re: The future of dubstep
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:51 pm
by kzero
juntistik wrote:I think that the really mainstream/well known stuff stuff (BOREgore, Ruskoetc.) all serves a purpose, and that is to get people into Dubstep in the first place. Not everyone can discover Dubstep through Dubstep Warz and the original dubstep of years ago (Fack im lucky I found it then..). People's interests progress and they eventually like more underground/unheard Dubstep anyway
After that there are always going to be the people pushing the futuristic melodic sound while others push the heavy grit. Honestly i feel like the melodic shit is exploding at this point, and that's what i prefer, but i hope that in the future there will be heavy melodic grit.
but honestly i would say the future of music as a whole will be one genre with all types of shit mixed in.
besides country
From this whole forum's perspective, i guess you could say i'm a dubstep noob
But it's true, the first dubstep i ever heard was Rusko's Essential Mix because it was something i never heard before and it came out of nowhere.
Since then i've grown to appreciate two different types of dubstep; the loud and fun dubstep, and the toned down and more 'chill' dubstep.
But when sharing dubstep with friends, you can't introduce them to the chill dubstep first... you have to amaze them with the fun side of dubstep. Besides, dubstep is just the name of a genre, i think there should be some division when calling all types of dubstep the same thing... Because in reality they are very different...
I have a very open mind, and try to ignore the elitist opinions basically just fuming out of this forum, but for the sake of the genres themselves, get over the name dubstep and just let the music evolve without being mad that the louder dubstep is becoming more popular (as you said Rusko/Boregore)
edit: tl;dr: i love the loud/overly-filth dubstep and the chill dubstep that the elitists like, but for organizations sake, separate the two into subdivisions of dubstep. yeah.
Re: The future of dubstep
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:15 pm
by 64hz
fractal wrote:i forsee 2010 to be a year where all genre's of edm unite and dj's learn to play a wide selection of sounds at parties
UNITY
Re: The future of dubstep
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:22 pm
by WhosZena
Hurtdeer wrote:dubloke wrote:WhosZena? wrote:Stuff like Rusko and Boregore is easy to listen to and doesn't take alot of concentration to appreciate it.
tbh i wouldnt want to listen to something that was an effort to enjoy
i would. but it's a mistake to assume that either one is the "correct" form of listening. We all like music for our own reasons
Yes, I agree, there is no "correct" form.
I like it when I can just chill and enjoy music, I also like it when im listening to a track and can hear all the detail and stuff.
Re: The future of dubstep
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:34 pm
by Oscar BrockWild
V-dub wrote:As long as no shitty kiddie producers begin to produce we will be fine!
to be fair, we probably wouldnt have dubstep as we know it in 2010 if they didnt..... obviously without the "shitty" bit. nobody wants shitty producers full stop
Re: The future of dubstep
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:55 am
by kulture
interesting thread... new ideas people
Re: The future of dubstep
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:21 am
by chicken
AntlionUK wrote:dubloke wrote:AntlionUK wrote:dubloke wrote:i hope this aggy phase will pass, i REALLY hope...
i'm just hoping all the students will fuck off and find a new trend and leaving dubstep to grow.
dont think students have to piss off (because I am a student) just students that think dubstep is cool so its what they have to listen to.
students that don't understand that there is other dubstep besides rusko and boregore.
all this hard shit all the time is starting to get on my nervs..im no agenst it but its all im hearing from the majority.
cant people kick back and make a selection of styles...thats the way
Re: The future of dubstep
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:28 am
by yong
Dubstep killed the word "dub" (and "[2] step", but not to as great an extent.)