Page 3 of 10

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:45 am
by wolf89
Thing is Hackman. You say no-one suggests a plausible explanation but believe you're in fact correct despite it having nothing more to support it. I mean you're saying it's certain that she is in fact some sort of reptilian instead of just having some eye spasm or weird movement or a video glitch. What evidence is there other than it looks kind of weird?

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:48 am
by hackman
wolf89 wrote:Thing is Hackman. You say no-one suggests a plausible explanation but believe you're in fact correct despite it having nothing more to support it. I mean you're saying it's certain that she is in fact some sort of reptilian instead of just having some eye spasm or a video glitch. What evidence is there other than it looks kind of weird?
i take it as evidence in combination with other things, it's just a piece of the puzzle
i'll admit to you lot, it probably seems a bit odd, nothing more
but don't tell me it's an eye spasm or video glitch

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:49 am
by boxxy
ok, we won't

what do you think is happening?

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:50 am
by wolf89
well, why isn't it?
You're just saying no it's not that because it isn't.

and nothing more

What are these other pieces of evidence you're talking about? I'm yet to see anything to support what you're saying.

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:54 am
by hackman
if it's a video error, give me some examples of other video errors that are in any way similar, i've never seen one and i doubt you have
same goes for an eye spasm

i could go on and on about astral encounters, witness testimony, ancient cultures texts and myths, symbolism, past life regression, channeling etc etc etc
but you won't find any of that credible because you fundamentally believe the world and reality is different to what i do so there is completely no point

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:54 am
by hackman
boxxy wrote:ok, we won't

what do you think is happening?
partial inter dimensional shift

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:55 am
by boxxy
hackman wrote:if it's a video error, give me some examples of other video errors that are in any way similar, i've never seen one and i doubt you have
same goes for an eye spasm

i could go on and on about astral encounters, witness testimony, ancient cultures texts and myths, symbolism, past life regression, channeling etc etc etc
but you won't find any of that credible because you fundamentally believe the world and reality is different to what i do so there is completely no point
my mind is completely open, i just like to stir the pot...

please pm me any links you might have

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:56 am
by hackman
i'm pretty tired, will do tomorrow

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:57 am
by boxxy
cool, thanks!

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:58 am
by collige
hackman wrote:
boxxy wrote:ok, we won't

what do you think is happening?
partial inter dimensional shift
Why is it then that all the evidence of reptilian transformations (or "partial inter dimensional shifts") are from transmitted, recorded events. You never see any straight-up photographs of this happening.

And why television broadcasters?

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:01 am
by parson
Image

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:02 am
by boxxy
collige wrote:
hackman wrote:
boxxy wrote:ok, we won't

what do you think is happening?
partial inter dimensional shift
Why is it then that all the evidence of reptilian transformations (or "partial inter dimensional shifts") are from transmitted, recorded events. You never see any straight-up photographs of this happening.

And why television broadcasters?
well, if they were doing it, the media would be a main tool

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:04 am
by hackman
television broadcasters because they're in front of a camera more often so more chances to see it
and they are more often than not live, so no chance to edit it out etc

photos i guess are less because it's usually a split second thing, and you'd be lucky to get it

similar like trying to take a photo of lightning with a shit camera (probably a shit analogy)

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:05 am
by hackman
and btw i'm not saying every single tv broadcaster is reptilian

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:06 am
by parson
i reckon a lot of em are lizards

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:07 am
by collige
hackman wrote:and btw i'm not saying every single tv broadcaster is reptilian
It would be a lot more helpful if you posted what you are saying rather than a dodgy youtube video and "can of worms".

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:08 am
by hackman
if anyone can astral project, you should try projecting to buckingham palace, i've heard some jokes stuff
can't wait to try it, once i got my technique down

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:09 am
by hackman
collige wrote:
hackman wrote:and btw i'm not saying every single tv broadcaster is reptilian
It would be a lot more helpful if you posted what you are saying rather than a dodgy youtube video and "can of worms".
maybe if people asked informative questions rather than ridicule we might actually get somewhere

i'm going to bed now :t:

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:18 am
by wolf89
You just act that way to everyone though too Hackman though.

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:05 am
by the acid never lies
I call bullshit on Parson believing in reptile people. Hackman on the other hand is most probably sincere. I know you hate people taking the piss but it's a little bit like a grown man believing in Santa Claus, as opposed to a devotion to Jesus so no need to get wound up right? Anyhow the most convincing thing in this entire thread is :

Image