Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
-
mohan
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 1:16 pm
- Location: Bristol
Post
by mohan » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:14 am
firky wrote:Prefer Carl Zeiss glass myself, check this badboy out. It was made for some Arab Prince IIRC and requires a static mount such as a car to use properly:
But that was a one off...... this baby you can own for only £38k
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/shop/200-500m ... x-dg-sigma
Sigma’s APO 200-500mm F2.8/400-1000mm F5.6 EX DG, is the first large-aperture ultra telephoto lens to have an F2.8 aperture at 500mm. With its specially designed attachment mounted becomes a 400-1000mm F5.6 ultra telephoto lens capable of auto-focus shooting. It has ELD (Extraordinary Low Dispersion) and SLD (Special Low Dispersion) glass for maximum correction of aberrations. Perfect fast moving nature subjects and sports such as surfing, polo and soccer and as it excels at tracking fast moving objects it is a great surveillance lens. Here, Sigma’s achievement is unsurpassed and stands alone.
here's some more stuff I had my hands on at Panavision;
Canon 1200mm 1:5.6

435 with a Clairmont PC system

and Panaflex Platinum

Gear porn FTW.
-
ashley
- Permanent Vacation
- Posts: 9591
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:00 pm
- Location: CHAT ▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀ GET BANGED
-
Contact:
Post
by ashley » Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:27 am
I got a 50mm 1.8 prime (like everyone)
But need to think wider.
I want one of these bad boys:
$670 though :s
-
firky
- Posts: 10336
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:13 pm
- Location: seckle is a tnuc
-
Contact:
Post
by firky » Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:31 pm
It's better IMO to spend more on glass than your body, go for it, you'll be able to mount it onto other bodies and there's plenty of places out there who can build you a custom mount for a small price

-
seckle
- Posts: 12404
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Post
by seckle » Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:59 pm
ashley wrote:I got a 50mm 1.8 prime (like everyone)
But need to think wider.
I want one of these bad boys:
$670 though :s
19mm , 20mm , 24mm lenses for a dslr, you can't go wrong really.you will see a difference in quality if you look further than sigma, but only in the times when you are fully closed down like f16 or f22, because at that point the quality of the glass is important. at f1.8 unless you're shooting bugs with a macro, what glass you have won't matter. sigma is good.
-
seckle
- Posts: 12404
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Post
by seckle » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:02 pm
mohan wrote:firky wrote:Prefer Carl Zeiss glass myself, check this badboy out. It was made for some Arab Prince IIRC and requires a static mount such as a car to use properly:
But that was a one off...... this baby you can own for only £38k
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/shop/200-500m ... x-dg-sigma
Sigma’s APO 200-500mm F2.8/400-1000mm F5.6 EX DG, is the first large-aperture ultra telephoto lens to have an F2.8 aperture at 500mm. With its specially designed attachment mounted becomes a 400-1000mm F5.6 ultra telephoto lens capable of auto-focus shooting. It has ELD (Extraordinary Low Dispersion) and SLD (Special Low Dispersion) glass for maximum correction of aberrations. Perfect fast moving nature subjects and sports such as surfing, polo and soccer and as it excels at tracking fast moving objects it is a great surveillance lens. Here, Sigma’s achievement is unsurpassed and stands alone.
here's some more stuff I had my hands on at Panavision;
Canon 1200mm 1:5.6

435 with a Clairmont PC system

and Panaflex Platinum

Gear porn FTW.
i'm only two years hands on with the red system. I've never got to play with panavision yet. youre lucky! jealous! gear check out is always fun!

-
firky
- Posts: 10336
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:13 pm
- Location: seckle is a tnuc
-
Contact:
Post
by firky » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:11 pm
Right, I am off on Thursday and Friday. I intend to put it to good use by sorting my website out

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests