Re: Lee Scratch Perry vs Digital Mystikz : ONUDP56
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:37 am
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
it does make me wonder....spire wrote:I have a feeling we might get an answer of "Sorry for the delay, its been so long we've decided not to go ahead with the vinyl". :/
vinyl releases aren't about the cash... if someone has to tell you this, then you have much to learn, young padawanCornbreadddd wrote:It really pisses me off that this won't go digital. Not only that, but it makes NO fucking sense for the record label itself.
All it would take is to simply put them up for download from your website and juno and these people would make way over twice what they would from just selling 1500 vinyls. Vinyl makes no money, thats old news. So why the fuck would you make people who don't have anything to play vinyl on, or aren't DJ's, miss out on these great tunes?
Oh definitely, I completely understand the culture around vinyl and the feelings many people have on it. But it completely frustrates me and seems nonsensical to think that a record label would ONLY release a record on vinyl and not digi. It just doesn't make sense, it would be so easy just to throw the tracks up for DL. It frustrates me that people can't move past the vinyl thing and get with the times. Okay yeah, I understand the feeling of nostalgia but it's almost 2012 and tons of people don't have anything on which to play vinyl and I feel that people need to get the hell over the whole vinyl only thing. That doesn't mean that I don't think vinyl should be completely abolished, I just feel that the standard for all record labels should be the choice of vinyl as well as digital for those can't play vinyls.kingGhost wrote:vinyl releases aren't about the cash... if someone has to tell you this, then you have much to learn, young padawanCornbreadddd wrote:It really pisses me off that this won't go digital. Not only that, but it makes NO fucking sense for the record label itself.
All it would take is to simply put them up for download from your website and juno and these people would make way over twice what they would from just selling 1500 vinyls. Vinyl makes no money, thats old news. So why the fuck would you make people who don't have anything to play vinyl on, or aren't DJ's, miss out on these great tunes?
saying that, i kind of wish this had a digital release too. but i'll probably cop the vinyl anyway
Cornbreadddd wrote:Oh definitely, I completely understand the culture around vinyl and the feelings many people have on it. But it completely frustrates me and seems nonsensical to think that a record label would ONLY release a record on vinyl and not digi. It just doesn't make sense, it would be so easy just to throw the tracks up for DL. It frustrates me that people can't move past the vinyl thing and get with the times. Okay yeah, I understand the feeling of nostalgia but it's almost 2012 and tons of people don't have anything on which to play vinyl and I feel that people need to get the hell over the whole vinyl only thing. That doesn't mean that I don't think vinyl should be completely abolished, I just feel that the standard for all record labels should be the choice of vinyl as well as digital for those can't play vinyls.kingGhost wrote:vinyl releases aren't about the cash... if someone has to tell you this, then you have much to learn, young padawanCornbreadddd wrote:It really pisses me off that this won't go digital. Not only that, but it makes NO fucking sense for the record label itself.
All it would take is to simply put them up for download from your website and juno and these people would make way over twice what they would from just selling 1500 vinyls. Vinyl makes no money, thats old news. So why the fuck would you make people who don't have anything to play vinyl on, or aren't DJ's, miss out on these great tunes?
saying that, i kind of wish this had a digital release too. but i'll probably cop the vinyl anyway
Vinyl isn't "the king of all sound" and all that hogwash it's just simply another medium of musical storage (an impractical one at that). I'm just angry at the fact that it would be so easy to allow people to download these tracks but no........
vinyl snobs.......

http://www.google.com/products/catalog? ... ps-sellersCornbreadddd wrote:
Oh definitely, I completely understand the culture around vinyl and the feelings many people have on it. But it completely frustrates me and seems nonsensical to think that a record label would ONLY release a record on vinyl and not digi. It just doesn't make sense, it would be so easy just to throw the tracks up for DL. It frustrates me that people can't move past the vinyl thing and get with the times. Okay yeah, I understand the feeling of nostalgia but it's almost 2012 and tons of people don't have anything on which to play vinyl and I feel that people need to get the hell over the whole vinyl only thing. That doesn't mean that I don't think vinyl should be completely abolished, I just feel that the standard for all record labels should be the choice of vinyl as well as digital for those can't play vinyls.
Vinyl isn't "the king of all sound" and all that hogwash it's just simply another medium of musical storage (an impractical one at that). I'm just angry at the fact that it would be so easy to allow people to download these tracks but no........
vinyl snobs.......
Got my copy on monday from Chemical. Obeah room is too much!!frank grimes jr. wrote:Order Status We have your pre-order and it will be filled when the record/s are released.
Order Date 31 Mar 2011