Re: Illegally Downloading Music
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 12:29 pm
XXX X XPedro Sánchez wrote:gwa wrote:I GET SENT SO MUCH MUSIC I DONT NEED TO TURN OFF THE CAPS LOCK NO MORE
X X
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
XXX X XPedro Sánchez wrote:gwa wrote:I GET SENT SO MUCH MUSIC I DONT NEED TO TURN OFF THE CAPS LOCK NO MORE
X X
Yes it does, and that's why I don't judge anyone for downloading as long as they buy what they can afford to support the artists they love.bass_culture wrote:With the amount of free legal content on the net (radio shows/mixes/free tunes) I don't think there's one solid argument which can justify piracy.
e.g.
Does that not apply to virtually everyone here?!Maccaveli wrote:My hunger for music and my diversity in taste far exceeds the contents of my wallet.
What settings should be used for higher than 256?Maccaveli wrote:Yeah I was gonna say, are you sure you don't just have your iTunes ripping settings on 256kbps?Naan Bread wrote:CD is always lossless.dididub wrote:If I buy a cd with the aim of playing some of the tunes on it out, and it comes in 256 kbps, I will probably pirate a 320 copy.
I haven't flat out pirated something I didn't own for a few years now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Book_( ... _standard)
So either you're lying or someone's fucking you over.
Isn't that an argument for piracy? Almost everyone posting here has done a mix and uploaded it at some point, or played a radio show or DJ set- that is all piracy unless you got authorisation for each tune. "Unauthorized copying, reproduction, hiring, lending, public performance and broadcasting prohibited"bass_culture wrote:With the amount of free legal content on the net (radio shows/mixes/free tunes) I don't think there's one solid argument which can justify piracy.
Edit > Preferences > Import Settings > (Setting) Custom > (Stereo Bit Rate) 320say_whut wrote: What settings should be used for higher than 256?
Nice one, and damn! I just assumed iTunes would import at 320, now I've got a huge library of 256Laszlo wrote:Edit > Preferences > Import Settings > (Setting) Custom > (Stereo Bit Rate) 320say_whut wrote: What settings should be used for higher than 256?
Same hereMr Hyde wrote:Nice one, and damn! I just assumed iTunes would import at 320, now I've got a huge library of 256Laszlo wrote:Edit > Preferences > Import Settings > (Setting) Custom > (Stereo Bit Rate) 320say_whut wrote: What settings should be used for higher than 256?
This is somewhat of a grey area I will grant you that. However I think there is a fundamental difference between hearing tunes in the context of a mix as opposed to downloading them in full for free, and thus having the ability to use them in the same capacity as someone who has paid for that same music.Mr Hyde wrote:Isn't that an argument for piracy? Almost everyone posting here has done a mix and uploaded it at some point, or played a radio show or DJ set- that is all piracy unless you got authorisation for each tune. "Unauthorized copying, reproduction, hiring, lending, public performance and broadcasting prohibited"bass_culture wrote:With the amount of free legal content on the net (radio shows/mixes/free tunes) I don't think there's one solid argument which can justify piracy.
Someone hearing a tune through a free (usually unauthorised) source and therefore not buying the tune or not pirating the tune directly is better for the artist in what way?
How about playing them out in a dj set? Even if the dj themself isn't getting paid, the venue and promoter are likely to be making money from door fees and drinks etc, essentially off the back of stolen music.wearecorsairs wrote:but what capacity can they use them in? they sure as hell can't use them commercially. its if a company does something like that where i go apeshit.
wolf89 wrote:Not I'm sorry I haven't a clue?
i'd rather have some people hearing my tune that might not have (if the DJ couldn't download it for free) than not have them hear it at all.bass_culture wrote:How about playing them out in a dj set? Even if the dj themself isn't getting paid, the venue and promoter are likely to be making money from door fees and drinks etc, essentially off the back of stolen music.wearecorsairs wrote:but what capacity can they use them in? they sure as hell can't use them commercially. its if a company does something like that where i go apeshit.
Repetition of b2b.(Pada) wrote:wolf89 wrote:Not I'm sorry I haven't a clue?
Nah mate. Clement freud b2b paul merton b2b a camp comedian b2b a woman b2b nicholas parsons alllll day!
I listen to JAM every night in bed haha
The filesharers manifestopkay wrote:contribute to scene -----> get free tunes