Re: Cracked software = cracked sound
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:53 pm
Let's get to the bottom line here, dump cubase, what a dinosaur.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Why the Cubase hate?nowaysj wrote:Let's get to the bottom line here, dump cubase, what a dinosaur.
newsflash: crappy producers don't deserve any money for their work. crap work is crap work and crap songs are crap songs, and should be treated as such. period. This is music in reality, not in the classroom. no one gets a pat on the back for effort.VirtualMark wrote:Unfortunately for a lot of crappy producers this means they won't get any money from their work.
Sharmaji wrote:^ ha! took me a second to realize that this wasn't about piracy. even better.
yeah i saw on the arturia website that their whole delivery date thing had been pushed back, and also saw that i'd missed a call from sweetwater (i'm out of the country at the moment so can't access vm), and i presume that's what they're telling me.
better late than never, right?
also, back to the conversation...
newsflash: crappy producers don't deserve any money for their work. crap work is crap work and crap songs are crap songs, and should be treated as such. period. This is music in reality, not in the classroom. no one gets a pat on the back for effort.VirtualMark wrote:Unfortunately for a lot of crappy producers this means they won't get any money from their work.
nowaysj wrote:Fuck of yes, but Sharma should be getting his first
My guy is saying MAY 30th!!!!! they receive it so I'll be getting it in June some time. But Sharma and I ordered from same place, and I ordered 3 months before him, and he is scheduled to get it first, so if he does, he better be locking his studio door, cause as far as I'm concerned, that one is mine.
When I first ordered the mini brute was supposed to come in like Feb 20th.... I've been a waitin a long time. Starting to really bug me bro.
But I'd be happy to do a review, make a Kontakt patch of a fucked up bass/synth, if y'all are okay with the ancient kontakt 3.5, still haven't upgraded.
Just so you know, there's quite a bit of data that shows that piracy only really hurts bigger name artists, but is actually BENEFICIAL to smaller artists. Don't get me wrong, to me, piracy is still stealing, and therefore wrong; but most of the people who pirate it are people who were never going to buy it in the first place, so the artist gains exposure from the download. The other ones that may have bought it if they had the money most likely WILL buy it if they really like it. How many mixes do you own? How many of those mixes contain songs that you've never bought? I don't mean to sound presumptuous, but I would assume that you probably have at least a few with tracks you don't own. How is this any different than pirating a song?Basic A wrote:You just agreed though, physical is dead.Attila wrote:Piracy has destroyed big labels. The whole musical landscape (with few exceptions) now belongs to independent artists. And now that recording and production costs hover around zero for 99% of artists it doesn't matter that music doesn't sell anymore. When you had to pay tens of thousand to record an album selling loads of copies was important, but now that we're all working itb from home studios the whole situation is irrelevant. Any real living in music always came from touring, so anybody saying piracy's killing their career is just making a really bad excuse for not doing well. Doesn't matter whether you trust or share anything with me because you can't argue facts.Basic A wrote:As musicians - piracy effects you negatively.Id be terrified to ever share anything with you, or to instill any sort of trust in you. Piracy has HURT indie musicians who dont get signing bonuses more then any other area of the economy.pirating in general has given independent musicians a chance.![]()
How are labels to fund these proverbial tours if they cant expect more then 99c a product, and noone pays that? You think venues and systems are free? I dont know about you, but Ive enver seen a subwoofer grow on a tree. If you read my post, youd see I covered how piracy was killing live music too.
Recording costs zero? you priced a microphone lately? you know how much FLStudio costs? Or the waves bundle you stole?
Are you trying to pretend maustripe still qualifies as indie when you say the markets dominated by indie labels? Have you turned on a radio, ever, in your life?
This isnt something eprsonal about my own standings in life, Im quite happy with my musical career, I press dubs out of pocket via cutting houses miles away from home, just for the love, because it feels good for the soul. The amount of money I dump into my music for the love... the fact remains products dont sell and promoters are selling there cars. The love, and willingness to invest your all in the shit, is whats going out of style due to piracy and me-me-me-all-for-free mentality.
really? a 1:10 mix cut of a potentially unfinished, unmastered tune in a mix that was intended for free download in the context of a mix, with an MC talking over it, at 128kbs, is the same as taking a 320/wav of a full track released with the intention of being sold?cmgoodman1226 wrote: How many mixes do you own? How many of those mixes contain songs that you've never bought? I don't mean to sound presumptuous, but I would assume that you probably have at least a few with tracks you don't own. How is this any different than pirating a song?
Don't even have the excuse of alcohol. Just straight losing it.atlascesar wrote:
So every tune in a mix has to be unfinished and unmastered? You've never downloaded a mix from the unsigned guys on here before? And just because the mix was intended for free download from the dj who spun it doesn't mean it was intended for free download from the original artist.Huts wrote:really? a 1:10 mix cut of a potentially unfinished, unmastered tune in a mix that was intended for free download in the context of a mix, with an MC talking over it, at 128kbs, is the same as taking a 320/wav of a full track released with the intention of being sold?cmgoodman1226 wrote: How many mixes do you own? How many of those mixes contain songs that you've never bought? I don't mean to sound presumptuous, but I would assume that you probably have at least a few with tracks you don't own. How is this any different than pirating a song?
It's not like listening to a preview on beatport, because you don't possess the file like you do with a mix. All I'm saying is that if you get so up in arms about piracy, owning a mix with finished tunes on it is essentially the same thing. It's one thing if you own every single song from the mix, but most people don't. And these same people are always the first to raise their arms and talk about how terrible piracy is.Killamike49 wrote:I think the point huts was trying to make, is that it's like listening to a preview on beatport. You don't get the whole tune, and most of the time the tunes being manipulated in one way or another anyway.