worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
ezADRUU wrote:Can a dude get a re-up please?...please!
Nice one! Almost forgot about this.Jah Pat wrote:Yeah, this is proper nice. Thanks a lot bro
if a specific label has a problem with a mix, let them take it up with the dj, that's how it works everywhere else on the internet with no problems"SAME LABEL" MIXES
-what we consider a "same label" mix is using one label's whole catalogue in one mix (example:..15 tunes, all from the XYZ label.). these kind of mixes are problematic for the forum, because in the past we've had labels complain to us about the obvious copyright issue involved.
by doing a "same label" mix; you're not leaving the label in question the opportunity to do their own "same label" mix as a product that they could then possibly sell. in general, we'd like to ask that you take the time to get permission from a label before posting these kinds of mixes because as a forum we don't want to be involved in resolving these situations.
Made this mix 1,5 years ago before I was aware of this "rule". But I fully agree, no harm doing mixes like this right?£10 Bag wrote:brilliant mix, so can we PLEASE get rid of this shitty rule now?
if a specific label has a problem with a mix, let them take it up with the dj, that's how it works everywhere else on the internet with no problems"SAME LABEL" MIXES
-what we consider a "same label" mix is using one label's whole catalogue in one mix (example:..15 tunes, all from the XYZ label.). these kind of mixes are problematic for the forum, because in the past we've had labels complain to us about the obvious copyright issue involved.
by doing a "same label" mix; you're not leaving the label in question the opportunity to do their own "same label" mix as a product that they could then possibly sell. in general, we'd like to ask that you take the time to get permission from a label before posting these kinds of mixes because as a forum we don't want to be involved in resolving these situations.
