Dubstepforum.com

considering the 'sacrilegious act' you have committed - remixing burial by pretending to be burial - the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive mate!

getting hurt by a few people saying 'urg' shows you to be not legit and seeking praise and assurance - upon finding an ambivalent comment you go * berserk on the internet*

Nope

incnic wrote:considering the 'sacrilegious act' you have committed - remixing burial by pretending to be burial - the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive mate!

getting hurt by a few people saying 'urg' shows you to be not legit and seeking praise and assurance - upon finding an ambivalent comment you go * berserk on the internet*

^

Dunno if not being prepped, trained or just generally used to negative comments in public makes someone 'not legit'.

can you talk about your methodology for approaching these remixes Davwuh?
lots of sampling of burial or reproduction of sounds or ?

95 percent of the album is samples from the Burial album itself. I mostly isolated drum/synth/vox hits on their own, chopped them up and used to create something entirely new. I rarely ever used any looping, I think there are either 1 or 2 tracks overall where there is slight looping, but it's so faint that you would barely notice it.

I used some external atmospheric samples to put my own twist on the record.. rain, as noted, I use a lot, as well as some extra static noises.

But if you hear things that don't sound anything like the original versions of the song, it is mostly because I modulated and messed around with all the samples I cut up.

So yeah, in short, I basically built every song from the ground up using 1-hit samples from the original album

ace!