Re: Kryptic Minds split up?
Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:10 pm
osiris techno = great for thinking music? come one man...ghosttown wrote:Apart from a few artists like Gantz and Commodo who are making some great for thinking music.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
osiris techno = great for thinking music? come one man...ghosttown wrote:Apart from a few artists like Gantz and Commodo who are making some great for thinking music.
baddis98 wrote:osiris techno = great for thinking music? come one man...ghosttown wrote:Apart from a few artists like Gantz and Commodo who are making some great for thinking music.
you might admit this statement can easily be understood as "Si and Killawatt's [uninspiring] take on techno is pushing dubstep forward".ghosttown wrote: [...] Si mixes things up. His collab EP with Killawatt shows they are trying something different, which is welcome in a time which the music (Dubstep) is generally in a rut IMO. Apart from a few artists like Gantz and Commodo who are making some great for thinking music.
What makes you say that?BlueyTeamTom wrote:badman vip release killed KM.
You realize headhunter's sound is based heavily on techno?Jurkhands wrote:how is bait techno helping dubstep? serious question.
OK, so we have established you don't like that style of Techno, it doesn't mean it is 'bait'. I'm sure if stores like Hardwax thought it was totally unoriginal or bait, they wouldn't of called it 'awesome.'Jurkhands wrote:CapturePt, you realise there's a distinct difference between shaping the structure and aesthetics of techno in interesting ways and forms to create something innovative - Headhunter, Martyn, 2562 stuff, early Hessle, Mala's Neverland - and buying some analog gear, fiddling around with it and produce some overly compressed garbage? I have absolutely nothing against some good techno-y tunes, quite the opposite is the case. but Osiris just isn't accomplishing anything noteworthy with their take on whatever you want to call it.
all imho ofc
would still like you to clear this up for meJurkhands wrote:you might admit this statement can easily be understood as "Si and Killawatt's [uninspiring] take on techno is pushing dubstep forward".ghosttown wrote: [...] Si mixes things up. His collab EP with Killawatt shows they are trying something different, which is welcome in a time which the music (Dubstep) is generally in a rut IMO. Apart from a few artists like Gantz and Commodo who are making some great for thinking music.
There are many records they don't stock. So rather than call them 'shit' they just don't stock them. Simple.Jurkhands wrote:wouldn't sell many plates by calling them shit now would they
There is nothing to clear up.Jurkhands wrote:would still like you to clear this up for meJurkhands wrote:you might admit this statement can easily be understood as "Si and Killawatt's [uninspiring] take on techno is pushing dubstep forward".ghosttown wrote: [...] Si mixes things up. His collab EP with Killawatt shows they are trying something different, which is welcome in a time which the music (Dubstep) is generally in a rut IMO. Apart from a few artists like Gantz and Commodo who are making some great for thinking music.
Jurkhands wrote:CapturePt, you realise there's a distinct difference between shaping the structure and aesthetics of techno in interesting ways and forms to create something innovative - Headhunter, Martyn, 2562 stuff, early Hessle, Mala's Neverland - and buying some analog gear, fiddling around with it and produce some overly compressed garbage? I have absolutely nothing against some good techno-y tunes, quite the opposite is the case. but Osiris just isn't accomplishing anything noteworthy with their take on whatever you want to call it.
all imho ofc
yeah, because fuck economic reason. as long as Osiris keeps its integrity as an "underground label", the usual places will still stock them, because somehow there is a demand. doesn't make the tunes any better though. in my oppinion.ghosttown wrote: There are many records they don't stock. So rather than call them 'shit' they just don't stock them. Simple.
I'm pretty sure they won't lose any sleep because you don't like Osiris, they have done pretty well with out your support.Jurkhands wrote:yo Capture Pt. Osiris is Kryptic Minds' label. I was purely concentrating on naming some examples for in my oppinion good and successful experiments to incorporate techno elements into dubstep. and again, in my oppinion, the recent output on Osiris has mostly been a tutorial on how not to do that.
yeah, because fuck economic reason. as long as Osiris keeps its integrity as an "underground label", the usual places will still stock them, because somehow there is a demand. doesn't make the tunes any better though. in my oppinion.ghosttown wrote: There are many records they don't stock. So rather than call them 'shit' they just don't stock them. Simple.
agree to disagree or w/e
Jurkhands wrote:tru supporters stick with their team in its darkest hours. hopefully together you may find a way out of this hellish place that is average techno.
I pretty much think Jurkhead or what ever his name is had a hand in it.MUT3 wrote:dubstepforum killed dubstep