jaydot wrote:the majority of Bulgarians and Romanians aren't "compotent" workers.
loljaydot wrote:we should be limiting migration because they are seen as "harder workers"
jaydot wrote:the majority of Bulgarians and Romanians aren't "compotent" workers.
loljaydot wrote:we should be limiting migration because they are seen as "harder workers"
I'm missing the point completely here. Idontgeddit.rayman612 wrote:jaydot wrote:the majority of Bulgarians and Romanians aren't "compotent" workers.loljaydot wrote:we should be limiting migration because they are seen as "harder workers"
Inverted commas?rayman612 wrote:theyre seen as hard workers, they have all the motivation to be hard workers, i have no facts/figures to prove theyre not hard workers
but theyre not
jaydot wrote:Competition is so fierce from skilled Brits/migrants for entry level blue collar jobs that they have no job, universities are charging them 9k a year to study, college isn't a guaranteed pathway into a job, and so they turn to crime etc as the cloud of disillusionment casts down upon them, when we should be limiting migration because they are seen as "harder workers", giving the working classes a better shot at things and stop labelling them as chavs, scum etc. Life in the UK is fucking grim as a teenager right now,

Seriousub wrote:I do enjoy swinging my spine to the sound of a strong snare running around 140
Definitely, before Immigrants it was Blacks.dfaultuzr wrote: seriously tho, have you ever wondered whether it was possible "immigrants" are being used as a scapegoat by governments all over the western world?
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
You'd think they'd reply with something original instead of left-leaning "that's racist" bullcrap.kaili wrote:dude jaydot dont dare say anything bad about immigrants on dsf trust me u get merked by every1
Is this a fucking game to you? You're so fucking whack man.jaydot wrote:I'm still waiting for Phigure's comeback.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
jaydot wrote:that was then, this is now
Why are you getting so irate?jesslem wrote:Is this a fucking game to you? You're so fucking whack man.jaydot wrote:I'm still waiting for Phigure's comeback.

cloaked_up wrote:im not a fan of belgium tho TBQH (genocide in the congo anyone????)
Really? Which law is that then? If you mean the Asylum Seekers (Return to Nearest Safe Country) Bill, that was withdrawn from discussion. Incidentally, it was sponsored by Philip Hollobone, Tory MP for Kettering.jaydot wrote:And asylum seekers, correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't they, by law, go to the nearest safe country. (that not being the UK)
Yeah sounds like a geezerwub wrote:Really? Which law is that then? If you mean the Asylum Seekers (Return to Nearest Safe Country) Bill, that was withdrawn from discussion. Incidentally, it was sponsored by Philip Hollobone, Tory MP for Kettering.jaydot wrote:And asylum seekers, correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't they, by law, go to the nearest safe country. (that not being the UK)
Mr Hollobone is also trying to bring back both National Service and Capital Punishment. You and him should go for a pint sometime.
its hardly a discussion since you only seem to base your arguments off of "IDK the facts but.." or "it's fundamentally wrong (ie, because i said so)", responding to an actual statistic posted by someone else with "oh i bet that figure is wrong", or just calling someone a geezer like above. youre a waste of timejaydot wrote:I'm still waiting for Phigure's comeback.
And to answer your "bonus question" df, that was then, this is now. Think how many immigrants have come into the country post-Thatcher. And asylum seekers, correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't they, by law, go to the nearest safe country. (that not being the UK)
uh why? can you give me an actual reason that isn't just xenophobia or thinly veiled racism? from what nic says about 4.2% it sounds like its just an issue thats being pitched to people like you in order to scapegoat minorities/immigrantsFirst refusal on social housing for British people. Good thing, the state shouldn't be obligated to house people who have arrived in the country and weren't born in, ahead of Brits. it's fundamentally wrong.
yes, so lets marginalize immigrants instead! why not an even playing field for all, regardless of the arbitrary fact of where someone was born?So now, under UKIP, where before Mr Bloggs was disenfranchised and marginilised with lack of social housing, lack of jobs, tax on property and minimum wage, etc etc he sees a brighter future, more so than New Labour or the current government. 'appy days!
This works both ways, and TBH from my own personal point of view I quite like working in Spain and not having a mountain of paperwork to do so.jaydot wrote:1.) Leaving the EU: We'd still continue free trade with our European counterparts but not have EU obligations, that means no mass immigration from countries like Romania and Bulgaria, and that's got to be a good thing.
Prison is as much about rehabilitation as it is about punishment, stripping off rights like this won't help. Some heinous crimes, fair enough. A multiple time child rapist serving life maybe shouldn't be allowed to vote. But someone doing 12 months for a less serious offence doesn't fall into the same category. Applying a blanket ban of 'No Votes For Prisoners' is just a lazy way of papering over the cracks.jaydot wrote:3.) No votes for prisoners: They should lose their right to vote as soon as they're incarcerated
Overall crime in UK & Wales fell by 10% in 2013, despite the fact that in Jan 2013 the total number of police was at it's lowest for 11yrs. So your statement doesn't make much sense as we have the figures to show that fewer police officers doesn't necessarily mean more crime.jaydot wrote:4.) No cuts to frontline policing: Good thing, yes?
Private Health Insurance you have to pay into before you get anything back, that applies to everyone regardless of whether they're an immigrant or not.jaydot wrote:5.) No benefits or private health insurance to immigrants for five years: As their manifesto points out they must "pay into before they take out, of the pot
Under the above, that means I'd only be eligible for social housing if I moved back to where my parents lived. This would mean a rapid depopulation of some of the larger cities (London, for example) as people have to effectively go home to get social housing.jaydot wrote:6.) Priority of social housing given to British people: YES! Finally! What I've been saying for nigh on ten years. I don't know how this will work (I read it on aleaflet through my door) but blue collar British workers, single parents, Brits on benefits (could be JSA, ESA, DLA) get first refusal on soial housing if their parents or grandparents were born in the area. As I say I'm not sure how they will implement it but hats off if they do, I don't know how many of you have applied for council housing or have any knowledge of the system but the wait is ridiculous and I know Manchester for one is regenerating areas only to put immigrants in the new houses they build.
Total global foreign aid (that's all countries, not just us) is now $134.8bn. UK total spend on foreign aid as of 2013 budget was 0.7% of gross national income. So that's a person on an income of £25,000 paying £5,465 in tax, of which £52 would go to the overseas aid budget a year. The UK is not cutting it's own throat so that people in other countries can be given bags of rice.jaydot wrote:8.) Make cuts to foreing aid that are "real and rigorous", another thing I've been wondering a while, why do we let our British people freeze and starve on the streets when we're giving millions if not billions in foreign aid?
I have no issue with these two points.jaydot wrote:2.) Scrapping of Bedroom Tax: Which is essentially a Robin Hood Tax.
7.) No tax on the minimum wage.
You speak as if real people aren't being affected by politics. Like it's just you and your mates in candyland.jaydot wrote:Why are you getting so irate?jesslem wrote:Is this a fucking game to you? You're so fucking whack man.jaydot wrote:I'm still waiting for Phigure's comeback.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests