?
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:05 am
GibidyBogidyGibidyBogidyGibidyBogidyGibidyBogidy 
Sorry!
Sorry!ha!rekorder wrote:tnuc.Future One wrote:Clowns.
Page 3 of 4
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:06 pm
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:46 pm
thanks, appreciatedapeks wrote:
http://download.yousendit.com/1A6C2E9D3A29F02F
Generated the sine waves in Cool Edit, they are 16 bit 44.1khz, all peaking at 0db I think.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:26 pm
A sine wave has no harmonics, its just the fundamental frequency.Tremourz wrote:Not inferior, just not as pure. All depends on what you want to use it for. There's less harmonics in a self-oscillating resonance. At least I've had better results this way.wasteman wrote:Lol.Auan wrote:He means synths don't make pure sine waves. Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.Future One wrote:What on earth are you talking about?Tremourz wrote: Synths oscillations aren't as pure as a single eqed frequency band pass with a high Q creating a self oscillating frequency. It's really important to get good full notes that are just sub fundamental.
This thread is hilarious, I love the pseudo science that gets thrown around.
Does anyone truly believe a sine wave created in a synth like massive is actually inferior?
I dunno what you mean, an 808 kick is really just a sine wave with some pitch modulation.tudniillik wrote:808 kick is self oscillation , too, he is right
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:32 am
what do you think is "making" those oscillations in the oscillators? its not a big mule turn wheel or control voltages etc. in this digi-realm, its all math: its about who's got the better algo-rythms.Auan wrote: Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:44 pm
Thanks for the chart. Cheers. Z
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:53 pm
I'm not talking about your source waveform although that will help. I'm talking about the filtering you do to it....resonances in specific frequencies.armada wrote:what do you think is "making" those oscillations in the oscillators? its not a big mule turn wheel or control voltages etc. in this digi-realm, its all math: its about who's got the better algo-rythms.Auan wrote: Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:01 pm
Sorry to sound dumb, but how are you using that chart to your advantage? 
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:48 pm
Yo Future that Tank Graphic is wicked.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:08 pm
I kind of like it when some sub notes are heavier than others. It breathes a bit of much needed life into things and breaks up the relentless monotony.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:21 pm
even when you've your powerfull sub... you still need to mix it right. Does it also experiences brutal in your track ?
like you always shout ... its mental ! music isnt always physics based...
how hard your subbass would be if your climax isnt that cruel it wont come that hard as you think
like you always shout ... its mental ! music isnt always physics based...
how hard your subbass would be if your climax isnt that cruel it wont come that hard as you think
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:35 am
What?even when you've your powerfull sub... you still need to mix it right. Does it also experiences brutal in your track ?
like you always shout ... its mental ! music isnt always physics based...
how hard your subbass would be if your climax isnt that cruel it wont come that hard as you think
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:56 am
you can make a straight sine in a VSTi subtractive synth, and just not subtract anything (ie do not use filter, EQ ETCETCETC)Tremourz wrote:I'm not talking about your source waveform although that will help. I'm talking about the filtering you do to it....resonances in specific frequencies.armada wrote:what do you think is "making" those oscillations in the oscillators? its not a big mule turn wheel or control voltages etc. in this digi-realm, its all math: its about who's got the better algo-rythms.Auan wrote: Sound Forge does because it uses maths and not oscillators.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:00 am
wowR wrote:even when you've your powerfull sub... you still need to mix it right. Does it also experiences brutal in your track ?
like you always shout ... its mental ! music isnt always physics based...
how hard your subbass would be if your climax isnt that cruel it wont come that hard as you think
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:52 am
yeah what was that guy talkin aboot
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:08 am
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:41 am
yeah i know my english isnt really good... but i mean its also about experiencing subbass. When you've a wack climax/drop but your subbass is on the good hz, it won't feel that strong.
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:07 pm
cmon guys.. go and make music!!!! i said music..not science!!
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:29 am
pretty much pot luck wether your lowest note hits the sweet spot of a system, i'm a sucker for the really low stuff, like Appleblim's FearR wrote:yeah i know my english isnt really good... but i mean its also about experiencing subbass. When you've a wack climax/drop but your subbass is on the good hz, it won't feel that strong.
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:19 am
cheers for this