Dubstepforum.com

feasible_weasel wrote:

fliPPo wrote:

feasible_weasel wrote:

Harlesden wrote:watching your own mother piss >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feasible weasel

get the fuck out of here

great argument
burial with reason 4 (no samples = lost)
Boxcutter with reason 4 (no samples = normal)

feasible weasle without dubstepforum.com (no production forum = sitting the corner banging sticks together)

haha sorry to be a tnuc, but really, shit thread! deserved.

such distain for a internet forum, believe me my posts are better than the endless artist bypassing the dubs and events,mixes sections and millions of threads bigging up a tune. at least im discussing dubstep as a subject.

Distain? Dis taint?

feasible_weasel wrote: believe me my posts are better than the endless artist bypassing the dubs and events,mixes sections and millions of threads bigging up a tune. at least im discussing dubstep as a subject.

It seems like fashion that sounds come in and out of fashion

We're really getting spoiled lately with the new Boxcutter and Burial albums. Two very different dubstep styles, but they're both first-rate. Personally, I'd give the edge to Burial if I made a Top-10 this year simply because I like his sound more.

And yeah, track 2 on Glyphic is ridiculous.

Harlesden wrote:

feasible_weasel wrote: believe me my posts are better than the endless artist bypassing the dubs and events,mixes sections and millions of threads bigging up a tune. at least im discussing dubstep as a subject.

It seems like fashion that sounds come in and out of fashion

instead of using a weasel combi, why dont u add something constructive to this thread.

saying you like someone better than the other is constructive then

just give up

Harlesden wrote:saying you like someone better than the other is constructive then

just give up

i should rephrased the title burial vs boxcutter..my bad...but the subject still has the same substance..
i guess people dont own both albums, so they would rather talk crap..

feasible_weasel wrote:

Harlesden wrote:saying you like someone better than the other is constructive then

just give up

i should rephrased the title burial vs boxcutter..my bad...but the subject still has the same substance..
i guess people dont own both albums, so they would rather talk crap..

you own both albums and talk more shit than anyone on the internet so wrong again

Harlesden wrote:

feasible_weasel wrote:

Harlesden wrote:saying you like someone better than the other is constructive then

just give up

i should rephrased the title burial vs boxcutter..my bad...but the subject still has the same substance..
i guess people dont own both albums, so they would rather talk crap..

you own both albums and talk more shit than anyone on the internet so wrong again

pointless talking to u, when u just wanna cuss man.

you're not or or you're just

trying to put it in a language you'll understand. bot.

feasible_weasel wrote: Dont get it twisted i like them both
but boxcutter is alot more dynamic. he can make the moody stuff, but techically hes seems able to make alot effects. and can marry these 2 moody and technical styles to make some really exciting dubstep.
Boxcutter

OK man so what you WERE Tryin to do was have a discussion comparing and contrasting Boxcutter and Burial? Fair enough it's a better idea than having a discussion about ketamine and dubstep, or bitching about how many people are bitching.

But they're two producers on basically opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of production and overall sound.

So basically youre trying to have this Burial vs Boxcutter discussion, but your initial thread doesn't stir up anything at all. Theyre totally different producers and therefore its like talking about how you like to eat bananas over apples because they taste different.

You know what i have learned from this thread? - that a few people on this forum are just plain mean and easily irritated by minor things.

Why anyone would cuss someone and take too seriously someone who calls himself/herself feasible weasel on the internet is beyond me.

What amazes me is that weasel does not curse back.


on the subject- both albums are great and worthy of discussion.

incyde wrote:

feasible_weasel wrote: Dont get it twisted i like them both
but boxcutter is alot more dynamic. he can make the moody stuff, but techically hes seems able to make alot effects. and can marry these 2 moody and technical styles to make some really exciting dubstep.
Boxcutter

OK man so what you WERE Tryin to do was have a discussion comparing and contrasting Boxcutter and Burial? Fair enough it's a better idea than having a discussion about ketamine and dubstep, or bitching about how many people are bitching.

But they're two producers on basically opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of production and overall sound.

So basically youre trying to have this Burial vs Boxcutter discussion, but your initial thread doesn't stir up anything at all. Theyre totally different producers and therefore its like talking about how you like to eat bananas over apples because they taste different.

hmm yes, point taken.
i dont see burial anything like randon trio or distance.. for some reason.
so i somehow ended up comparing boxcutter and burial.
my point still holds relevance, that boxcutter is a much better producer in a whole sense, and seems to beable to go for a faster beat,and something much slower very easily. where i feel burial is stuck at one pace.

selector.dub.u wrote:You know what i have learned from this thread? - that a few people on this forum are just plain mean and easily irritated by minor things.

Why anyone would cuss someone and take too seriously someone who calls himself/herself feasible weasel on the internet is beyond me.

What amazes me is that weasel does not curse back.


on the subject- both albums are great and worthy of discussion.

theres so little point in cussing back..its an internet forum, im not getting into sqwabbles (spelling) its pointless. as this is not a real life situation.
i may not put across what im am trying to persuade very well. but ide really like to hear peoples input on certain subjects.
as when i come on here its frankly the same old stuff posted.
yes i have a silly name. that reflects my personality and humour..... as again its just the internet.

People takes too serious feasible's threads... he is a nice weasel though, there are some threads that are a bit nonsense and threadless, but nonetheless there are always tons of people replying to those threads.
I do take his serious word, thats why i wrote on this one that both, Burial and Boxcutter, are 2 of the best producers attm.

[quote="7""]People takes too serious feasible's threads... he is a nice weasel though, there are some threads that are a bit nonsense and threadless, but nonetheless there are always tons of people replying to those threads.
I do take his serious word, thats why i wrote on this one that both, Burial and Boxcutter, are 2 of the best producers attm. [/quote]
i like boxcutters grasp of production alot...burial has a real knack of getting the raining dark days. ideally ide like a bit of both.

See, feasible made his own review.
Burial FTW for me.

Big up FW

[quote="7""]See, feasible made his own review.
Burial FTW for me.

Big up FW[/quote]
braap "7"

well he is kinda funny maybe shouldint be so mean

jred wrote:well he is kinda funny maybe shouldint be so mean

do what u want my friend. all love and joy makes roy a dull boy

Boxcutter = Burial