Page 3 of 5
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:25 am
by badger
you must be forgetting the great meat war of 1789. an army of a million bacon rashers was slaughtered by a much better equipped force of 60,000 glazed hams. a very sad day in history, we must learn from it so that it never happens again
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:29 am
by kidlogic
You had to bring up that ol' chestnut, eh? Of course when put up against hams (glazed no less!!!!), bacon doesnt stand a chance, but in most situations the addition of bacon does mean success. Bacon vs Ham will always turn out that way, although its always a very close battle.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:32 am
by datura
badger wrote:you must be forgetting the great meat war of 1789. an army of a million bacon rashers was slaughtered by a much better equipped force of 60,000 glazed hams. a very sad day in history, we must learn from it so that it never happens again
Don't be so silly, that never happened. That was made up by pro-beef propoganda engine trying to cause factions within the Church Of Ham.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:32 am
by badger
this was battle was nothing less than a massacre. such a senseless loss.
when will we learn?!
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:34 am
by badger
datura wrote:badger wrote:you must be forgetting the great meat war of 1789. an army of a million bacon rashers was slaughtered by a much better equipped force of 60,000 glazed hams. a very sad day in history, we must learn from it so that it never happens again
Don't be so silly, that never happened. That was made up by pro-beef propoganda engine trying to cause factions within the Church Of Ham.
another misguided fool subscribing to the whole hamocaust denial trend eh? shame on you!
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:37 am
by datura
Stop with your naysayings..all ham and portk based products are equal and always have been and have live in peace with each other from creation to the current day.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:39 am
by ex-ham-toucher
*Ex-Ham-Toucher shifts slightly in his grave*
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:40 am
by badger
look what you did datura!
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:45 am
by forensix (mcr)
Ex-Ham-Toucher wrote:*Ex-Ham-Toucher shifts slightly in his grave*
stay back
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:51 am
by datura
forensix (mcr) wrote:Ex-Ham-Toucher wrote:*Ex-Ham-Toucher shifts slightly in his grave*
stay back
lol you have the most finely tuned hamdar
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:53 am
by kidlogic
forensix (mcr) wrote:Ex-Ham-Toucher wrote:*Ex-Ham-Toucher shifts slightly in his grave*
stay back
Thats a really nice ham!
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:56 am
by habitualbeatscamp
Looks a little dry to me..
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:57 am
by forensix (mcr)
HabitualBeatsCamp wrote:Looks a little dry to me..
how dare you question the ham
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:58 am
by datura
HabitualBeatsCamp wrote:Looks a little dry to me..
BANNED
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:59 am
by badger
he's right you know. that first ham does look pretty dry. it's one of those show hams they use in photography. looks really nice at a glace but would be pretty disappointing to the touch
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:00 am
by badger
in fact i'm not even sure it's real. looks like one of those plastic food things they have in museums
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:01 am
by habitualbeatscamp
datura wrote:HabitualBeatsCamp wrote:Looks a little dry to me..
BANNED
Damn..
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:06 am
by kidlogic
Yeah, upon further inspection that may be a show ham. Nothing wrong with that, show hams are hams too. I wonder where its sash and tiara are?
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:11 am
by badger
kidlogic wrote:Yeah, upon further inspection that may be a show ham. Nothing wrong with that, show hams are hams too. I wonder where its sash and tiara are?
what are you talking about? show hams aren't even made of ham. where's the joy in that? you might as well be touching a TV or a pen
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:13 am
by datura
thou shalt not worship false idols