Page 3 of 4

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:09 am
by parson
it means to fellate

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:11 am
by epithet
I'm inclined to believe you're making shit up again to appear cool.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:12 am
by parson
i'm inclined to believe i've lost interest in your state of belief

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:13 am
by misk
parson, you're a cool guy, but remember that there are two things you can always count on.

1. The only thing you can trust people to do is be themselves

2. if you expect something to happen, it will

so yeah - i wouldnt worry about conspiracies too much - they'll show up everywhere.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:15 am
by parson
so that means i should mark you down as happy in the matrix eh

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:17 am
by parson
you're not going to change my mind any more than somebody trying to convince you magick doesn't work

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:21 am
by epithet
Parson wrote:i'm inclined to believe i've lost interest in your state of belief

you're not going to change my mind any more than somebody trying to convince you magick doesn't work
Thats the thing. You'll believe whatever you like because you want to. But c'mon bro you aint proved shit. Not even that your comp got hacked before spraying it all over here cos you think you're a danger to public awareness.

Check yaself before ya wreck yaself.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:21 am
by parson
i've proved that your'e annoying and have no interest in evidence provided and will murk yourself repeatedly so long as people respond

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:27 am
by epithet
What evidence bro ? You don't know what happened to say if your computer got hacked or not. You just went of on some paranoid spiel. If i'm annoying, it's cos you let me prick your consciouness with rational thought and you don't like it. And i couldn't give a fuck if people respond.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:29 am
by parson
oh i wasn't saying i could not be convinced that my computer wasn't hacked.

there's a possibility it just shat itself at a time when i was fired up.

what i'm not going to be convinced about is that the claims i'm making about conspiracies, coverups, and mass mind control being false

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:32 am
by nesslei
you guys!

edit: ...are both very convincing in your own rights.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:32 am
by parson
ness, do you know this jagoff

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:19 am
by nesslei
Parson wrote:ness, do you know this jagoff
it would be misleading to say i know him. but we did meet several years ago. and apparently i stared straight through him a couple of months ago. maybe he's invisible...?

are you, epithet?

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:22 am
by parson
just look for the maori with the most rhythm

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:35 am
by misk
Parson wrote:you're not going to change my mind any more than somebody trying to convince you magick doesn't work
its all good man. Im not saying that your crazy. im not saying that your lying or making any of this up for attention. what i am saying is that the more you focus on this, the more it'll happen.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:41 am
by nesslei
Parson wrote:just look for the maori with the most rhythm
sorry, that spot is taken by this guy (imo)

Image

tiki taane

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:43 am
by epithet
nesslei wrote:
Parson wrote:ness, do you know this jagoff
it would be misleading to say i know him. but we did meet several years ago. and apparently i stared straight through him a couple of months ago. maybe he's invisible...?

are you, epithet?
heh...yeah I'm the ghost who walks but how much can you really know a person anyway if that person doesn't know themself ?

BTW I'm not maori. :P

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:50 am
by nesslei
epithet wrote:
nesslei wrote:
Parson wrote:ness, do you know this jagoff
it would be misleading to say i know him. but we did meet several years ago. and apparently i stared straight through him a couple of months ago. maybe he's invisible...?

are you, epithet?
heh...yeah I'm the ghost who walks but how much can you really know a person anyway if that person doesn't know themself ?

BTW I'm not maori. :P
ha, good question. only to the extent that you trust your own perceptions, i guess. even then you would not know that person but merely have made an observation.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 2:58 am
by misk
epithet wrote:
nesslei wrote:
Parson wrote:ness, do you know this jagoff
it would be misleading to say i know him. but we did meet several years ago. and apparently i stared straight through him a couple of months ago. maybe he's invisible...?

are you, epithet?
heh...yeah I'm the ghost who walks but how much can you really know a person anyway if that person doesn't know themself ?

BTW I'm not maori. :P
better than they know themselves. We hide our biggest faults from ourselves, yet they're usually searingly obvious to those around us.

:lol: this is fun!

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 3:00 am
by parson
Misk wrote:
epithet wrote:
nesslei wrote:
Parson wrote:ness, do you know this jagoff
it would be misleading to say i know him. but we did meet several years ago. and apparently i stared straight through him a couple of months ago. maybe he's invisible...?

are you, epithet?
heh...yeah I'm the ghost who walks but how much can you really know a person anyway if that person doesn't know themself ?

BTW I'm not maori. :P
better than they know themselves. We hide our biggest faults from ourselves, yet they're usually searingly obvious to those around us.

:lol: this is fun!
are u callin me vain