Synthactica Records wrote:slow down a 170bpm dnb track to its half 85 bpm - what you get is dubstep (ok, there is no pitch correction).
double the speed of a 90bpm dubstep track - what you get is dnb (ok, there is no pitch correction). the structure is the same. vice versa.
if you look at the electronic music genre evolution at the moment the most exiting things happen in Dubstep.
there will be time when Dubstep will burn out just like dnb.
I know other people have commented on this post but i feel the need to re-iterate what mistake believing this is.
Yes, there are some general structures in d&b that when you shift tempo (from 175bpm > 140bpm tbh, not 90bpm) seem to translate, especially if you look at early dubstep when the snares were more often on the 2 and the 4, and not the 3.
but the devil is in the detail - detail that a lot of the recent d&b convert producers seem to massively overlook. there are textures, ideas, details that are just as important in defining what makes dubstep original that are totally independent of tempo. just "doing newschool d&b at 140bpm" seems to produce the most spectacularly bad dubstep records imo.
and as for the suggestion that dubstep "will burn out just like dnb" - sure it is a concern and yes, no movement lasts forever, especially when it undergoes such massive transformation, delocalisation and exposure as dubstep has since Jan 06, but the future is not pre-determined and i still have faith that a lot of good people have a vested interest in keeping dustep open, original, exciting and vital for as long as they can...