worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
yeah ive got all the legal digital dmzs of bleep but dont like playing them out either. then again, no one here would even know what im playing, let alone that they're mostly vinyl exclusivesNevalo wrote:ive got the digital versions of anti-war dub & mud VIP but im not 100% sure about playing them out, just because i dont wanna get called out for 'stealing' tunes that ive actually bought.
Edit* forgot about skank
yea thats where i picked up skank (& the red ep come to think of it.)Phigure wrote:yeah ive got all the legal digital dmzs of bleep but dont like playing them out either. then again, no one here would even know what im playing, let alone that they're mostly vinyl exclusivesNevalo wrote:ive got the digital versions of anti-war dub & mud VIP but im not 100% sure about playing them out, just because i dont wanna get called out for 'stealing' tunes that ive actually bought.
Edit* forgot about skank
your not alonewolf89 wrote:I don't know why but I seem to have started becoming more and more proud of the dumber and dumber things that I get up to at the moment.
thatd be coolsignals wrote:i wish bars had arcades like the arcades in tokyo and i wish busses ran later
Seriously. You can have a bunch of flowers. Thats about it._v_ wrote:hate it when people use the term "a bunch" or "a whole bunch" for things you cant actually have a bunch of.
eg: "I visited the park a whole bunch"
...
I dunno, a WAV is 4 times the bitrate of a 320, I can tell the difference on monitors.dubfordessert wrote:320 is basically indistinguishable from wav tbh. probably V0 would be fine too.
Bunch of bananas_v_ wrote:Seriously. You can have a bunch of flowers. Thats about it._v_ wrote:hate it when people use the term "a bunch" or "a whole bunch" for things you cant actually have a bunch of.
eg: "I visited the park a whole bunch"
...
...
...
lol. why are you listening to tunes on your monitors?Terpit wrote:I dunno, a WAV is 4 times the bitrate of a 320, I can tell the difference on monitors.dubfordessert wrote:320 is basically indistinguishable from wav tbh. probably V0 would be fine too.
you dont?Nevalo wrote:lol. why are you listening to tunes on your monitors?Terpit wrote:I dunno, a WAV is 4 times the bitrate of a 320, I can tell the difference on monitors.dubfordessert wrote:320 is basically indistinguishable from wav tbh. probably V0 would be fine too.
Phigure wrote:you dont?Nevalo wrote:lol. why are you listening to tunes on your monitors?Terpit wrote:I dunno, a WAV is 4 times the bitrate of a 320, I can tell the difference on monitors.dubfordessert wrote:320 is basically indistinguishable from wav tbh. probably V0 would be fine too.
Phigure wrote:you dont?Nevalo wrote:lol. why are you listening to tunes on your monitors?Terpit wrote:I dunno, a WAV is 4 times the bitrate of a 320, I can tell the difference on monitors.dubfordessert wrote:320 is basically indistinguishable from wav tbh. probably V0 would be fine too.
Terpit wrote:Phigure wrote:you dont?Nevalo wrote:lol. why are you listening to tunes on your monitors?Terpit wrote:I dunno, a WAV is 4 times the bitrate of a 320, I can tell the difference on monitors.dubfordessert wrote:320 is basically indistinguishable from wav tbh. probably V0 would be fine too.
my monitors sound better than my hifi, havent used it anymore ever since i got themNevalo wrote:Phigure wrote:you dont?Nevalo wrote:lol. why are you listening to tunes on your monitors?Terpit wrote:I dunno, a WAV is 4 times the bitrate of a 320, I can tell the difference on monitors.dubfordessert wrote:320 is basically indistinguishable from wav tbh. probably V0 would be fine too.
(but seriously... hi-fi for listening, monitors for mixing)
Yes, thank you. Proper usage of the word!Terpit wrote:Bunch of bananas_v_ wrote:Seriously. You can have a bunch of flowers. Thats about it._v_ wrote:hate it when people use the term "a bunch" or "a whole bunch" for things you cant actually have a bunch of.
eg: "I visited the park a whole bunch"
...
...
...