Funk Eh wrote:Young guy hits older guy, older guys drops younger guy in self defense.
Nothing left to see here.
this
Funk Eh wrote:Young guy hits older guy, older guys drops younger guy in self defense.
Nothing left to see here.
I should've made it more clear, but that was a reply to Hackman.borrowed wrote:I don't know who you're replying to, but I'm agreeing. I've been saying we're less violent than ever.
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
was it that bad?borrowed wrote: You can call me stupid and primitive once you get a proper grasp on the English language.
:]
Hahahah no worriesmorro_e wrote:was it that bad?borrowed wrote: You can call me stupid and primitive once you get a proper grasp on the English language.
:]
sorry i was high as fuck
More or less this.the acid never lies wrote:
I suppose you could say that violence is more institutionalized now. Ideologically we as a people are more conditioned to accept violence only in pre-determined cases and to actively endorse its acceptable contexts. The law outlines the extent to which an individual has the right (permission) to use physical force. The hardcore violence is monopolized by the heads with helmets
barehanded boxing was actually safer though. people couldn't hit each other so hard so damage was actually less. there were more cuts and bruises perhaps but people weren't giving each other brain damage. and public executions still happen all over the worldborrowed wrote:Hell, up until the 1920s, men boxed barehanded and executions were publicized.
given up on the henchgwa project then?gwa wrote:i'd rather be much more intelligent than be as strong as possible.
If I ever get mugged, I will be glad I know Taekwondo.badger wrote: but organised fights like martial arts are a sport and nothing else.
ahahahaboomstix wrote:...he was lucky EBM didn't take his shoes
well ok, maybe not "nothing else" but martial arts (in their proper setting) aren't really intended to be a way of solving disputes, and to be perfectly honest using martial arts when getting mugged would probably be contrary to the teachings of restraint and discipline that are central to themcollige wrote:If I ever get mugged, I will be glad I know Taekwondo.badger wrote: but organised fights like martial arts are a sport and nothing else.
yesbadger wrote:well ok, maybe not "nothing else" but martial arts (in their proper setting) aren't really intended to be a way of solving disputes,collige wrote:If I ever get mugged, I will be glad I know Taekwondo.badger wrote: but organised fights like martial arts are a sport and nothing else.
No. Defense of yourself and family is pretty much the only for them to be used in real life.and to be perfectly honest using martial arts when getting mugged would probably be contrary to the teachings of restraint and discipline that are central to them
If someone pulls a weapon on me, they're getting incapacitated.badger wrote:it depends how you were to use it i guess. you're unlikely to be at massive risk (other than your belongings) when getting mugged so restraint would be key
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests