...That's OK. Just try to have fun and learn something from it and you're pretty much guaranteed to improve.HERMIT wrote:I officially suck at this.

...That's OK. Just try to have fun and learn something from it and you're pretty much guaranteed to improve.HERMIT wrote:I officially suck at this.
Jodorowsky wrote:Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.
Yep - open season! But you have 4 days... which reminds me:64hz wrote:sweet never got the chance for one of these before. anyone can have a go right?
if so, i am all over this shit
Same thing happened to me w/ dsf22 - had a great start, got overzealous and turned it into mudcakes in no time flat, didn't get back around to trying to wrap it up until it was too late.tavravlavish wrote:if you get off to a shitty start you just get totally uninspired to do anything with it, I was stoked on my idea originally but just got super lazy and I havn't really expanded on it much ill try to turn something but whooo knows, i just havnt been spending any time on it
Jodorowsky wrote:Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.
Jesus I hope not lol.static_cast wrote:
That said, is it cheating if the samples are so utterly mangled as to be unrecognizable?
Hmm. Wonder if it's cheating to mangle a sample down to a sine wave, load it back into Sampler and add some FM....kaiori breathe wrote:Jesus I hope not lol.static_cast wrote:
That said, is it cheating if the samples are so utterly mangled as to be unrecognizable?
I always stay away from the osc in sampler, since it is, well an oscillator..but it's a fine line not something to worry to much about. All for fun and learning anyway.static_cast wrote:Hmm. Wonder if it's cheating to mangle a sample down to a sine wave, load it back into Sampler and add some FM....kaiori breathe wrote:Jesus I hope not lol.static_cast wrote:
That said, is it cheating if the samples are so utterly mangled as to be unrecognizable?
nahhhhhhhhhhh course not
Yeah, but so is any LFO. You can't actually hear the oscillator itself so I reckon it doesn't count.surefya wrote:I always stay away from the osc in sampler, since it is, well an oscillator..but it's a fine line not something to worry to much about. All for fun and learning anyway.static_cast wrote:Hmm. Wonder if it's cheating to mangle a sample down to a sine wave, load it back into Sampler and add some FM....kaiori breathe wrote:Jesus I hope not lol.static_cast wrote:
That said, is it cheating if the samples are so utterly mangled as to be unrecognizable?
nahhhhhhhhhhh course not
Good point. Always thought the osc in sampler was mixed in with the signal. But if it only modulates then you are totally right.static_cast wrote:Yeah, but so is any LFO. You can't actually hear the oscillator itself so I reckon it doesn't count.surefya wrote:I always stay away from the osc in sampler, since it is, well an oscillator..but it's a fine line not something to worry to much about. All for fun and learning anyway.static_cast wrote:Hmm. Wonder if it's cheating to mangle a sample down to a sine wave, load it back into Sampler and add some FM....kaiori breathe wrote:Jesus I hope not lol.static_cast wrote:
That said, is it cheating if the samples are so utterly mangled as to be unrecognizable?
nahhhhhhhhhhh course not
ah yessss, checked the manual..it's for modulation only. Still on time to try it out in this compsurefya wrote:Good point. Always thought the osc in sampler was mixed in with the signal. But if it only modulates then you are totally right.static_cast wrote:Yeah, but so is any LFO. You can't actually hear the oscillator itself so I reckon it doesn't count.surefya wrote:
I always stay away from the osc in sampler, since it is, well an oscillator..but it's a fine line not something to worry to much about. All for fun and learning anyway.
yeah, I was thinking about starting over, I think im just gonna wait for the next one, being busy sucks I never have time to focus on my musack its depressing.alphacat wrote:Same thing happened to me w/ dsf22 - had a great start, got overzealous and turned it into mudcakes in no time flat, didn't get back around to trying to wrap it up until it was too late.tavravlavish wrote:if you get off to a shitty start you just get totally uninspired to do anything with it, I was stoked on my idea originally but just got super lazy and I havn't really expanded on it much ill try to turn something but whooo knows, i just havnt been spending any time on it
Might I recommend starting from scratch and doing something a lot more minimal?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests