Re: Burial X Kode9 MAH mix
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:02 pm
Will download when i get home. When does MAH officially retire? Cause as of late, she has still been doing alot of guest mixes.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
word. yeah, burial applies his white noise very effectively. it's not haphazard at all.joe muggs wrote:I've finally got round to it after a stupid few days. Gutted I couldn't have listened live, but the Burial/Kode9 mix is brilliant! Sonds absolutely fresh, varied, weird and wonderful to me. The Burial crackle isn't random or indiscriminate, it changes and is really well applied to make you listen to hear rhythms that might be more or less familiar sound completely alien... I dig it.
Very nice indeed to hear MAH give a big up to veryverymuch.com too![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Yeah. I wouldn't call it white noise though. Bit more to it than just being noise.fractal wrote: word. yeah, burial applies his white noise very effectively. it's not haphazard at all.
and then there is of course the literal definition of white noise (full spectrum) which it doesnt fit either...Motorway to Roswell wrote:Yeah. I wouldn't call it white noise though. Bit more to it than just being noise.fractal wrote: word. yeah, burial applies his white noise very effectively. it's not haphazard at all.
http://www.dubstepforum.com/burial-kode ... 60063.htmldeadlyhype wrote:Would really appreciate it if someone could give me the download link for this last show so i can keep it forever and also the link for the sonar show which was on her show. Thanks
I thought at the time "Gwaarrn Joe!" Nothin like a nice bit of publicity. That interview is sick too.joe muggs wrote:Very nice indeed to hear MAH give a big up to veryverymuch.com too![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Kode9 is fucking hilarious, you can call it ungrateful or whatever but I don't think he cares about the people that whine over the internet, he'd probably prefer it if they didn't buy the records and just fucked off! And I find that very funny.gantzgraf wrote:"with fans like them who needs enemies"
tweeted by kode9 today.
He defintiely doesn't give a shit what people say on the interenet.jsml wrote:Kode9 is fucking hilarious, you can call it ungrateful or whatever but I don't think he cares about the people that whine over the internet, he'd probably prefer it if they didn't buy the records and just fucked off! And I find that very funny.gantzgraf wrote:"with fans like them who needs enemies"
tweeted by kode9 today.
Oh, I wasn't trying to call it "just noise" I was referring to an old burial interview where he talks about his love for "white noise" such as the crackle and pops of records, water, fire, etc as use for texture.. I'll try to dig it up after work or tomorrow.Motorway to Roswell wrote:Yeah. I wouldn't call it white noise though. Bit more to it than just being noise.fractal wrote: word. yeah, burial applies his white noise very effectively. it's not haphazard at all.
None of his examples are white noise though really, are they? Is there a thread with Burial interviews in? I've read the ones listed below.fractal wrote:Oh, I wasn't trying to call it "just noise" I was referring to an old burial interview where he talks about his love for "white noise" such as the crackle and pops of records, water, fire, etc as use for texture.. I'll try to dig it up after work or tomorrow.Motorway to Roswell wrote:Yeah. I wouldn't call it white noise though. Bit more to it than just being noise.fractal wrote: word. yeah, burial applies his white noise very effectively. it's not haphazard at all.
I don't mean white noise in the literal sense, I mean "background noise" I suppose, will look into my collection of interviews when I get home. Might have been the one incnic didMotorway to Roswell wrote:None of his examples are white noise though really, are they? Is there a thread with Burial interviews in? I've read the ones listed below.fractal wrote:Oh, I wasn't trying to call it "just noise" I was referring to an old burial interview where he talks about his love for "white noise" such as the crackle and pops of records, water, fire, etc as use for texture.. I'll try to dig it up after work or tomorrow.Motorway to Roswell wrote:Yeah. I wouldn't call it white noise though. Bit more to it than just being noise.fractal wrote: word. yeah, burial applies his white noise very effectively. it's not haphazard at all.
http://blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com/2 ... urial.html
http://hyperdubrecords.blogspot.com/200 ... -2007.html
http://blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com/2 ... ew_21.html
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/
http://www.factmag.com/2009/01/01/interview-burial/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/oct/26/urban
fractal wrote:I don't mean white noise in the literal sense, I mean "background noise" I suppose, will look into my collection of interviews when I get home. Might have been the one incnic didMotorway to Roswell wrote:None of his examples are white noise though really, are they? Is there a thread with Burial interviews in? I've read the ones listed below.fractal wrote:Oh, I wasn't trying to call it "just noise" I was referring to an old burial interview where he talks about his love for "white noise" such as the crackle and pops of records, water, fire, etc as use for texture.. I'll try to dig it up after work or tomorrow.Motorway to Roswell wrote:Yeah. I wouldn't call it white noise though. Bit more to it than just being noise.fractal wrote: word. yeah, burial applies his white noise very effectively. it's not haphazard at all.
http://blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com/2 ... urial.html
http://hyperdubrecords.blogspot.com/200 ... -2007.html
http://blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com/2 ... ew_21.html
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/
http://www.factmag.com/2009/01/01/interview-burial/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/oct/26/urban
Anyways, my point was that he makes excellent use of "those sounds"hope that point at least stands