Page 4 of 10

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:25 pm
by therook
ya know the transformer sounds aren't made in a synth...(nor from a movie) will post a sample of what I made when I get home sunday.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:47 pm
by Wrigzilla
Recessive Trait wrote:i want to see a jaydot vs excision tune battle.

This -w-

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:51 pm
by Smartyyy
What you just said was your opinion not everyone elses. Get over it

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:09 pm
by Crosby
jaydot wrote: I prefer my brostep to have a more complex drum pattern and more depth to the bass. And a little additional melody too. , Datsik tracks I've listened to are always kick, snare...kick...kick...snare.... always 1/3 and the basses aren't that aren't to reploicate... one oscillator in use, maybe two at most. I prefer more harmonics, more depth, if you get me. Datsik/Excsion basses are a little on the thin side
Soundcloud
lol

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:05 pm
by Basic A
excision wrote:
Basic A wrote:Prediction:

Datsik or Excision shows up and posts in thread, being thier typical, friendly, tolerant selves.

Jaydot goes OMG Im sorry guise!!!

Alpaca pictures.

Sharm locks it.

Another day on DSF.
love you guys. xoxoxo. waiting for alpaca pics..........
Lmfao, see, called it. you guys have immensely long fuses man. Id go ape after about 20 or so of these.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:13 pm
by qwaycee_
Crosby wrote:
jaydot wrote: I prefer my brostep to have a more complex drum pattern and more depth to the bass. And a little additional melody too. , Datsik tracks I've listened to are always kick, snare...kick...kick...snare.... always 1/3 and the basses aren't that aren't to reploicate... one oscillator in use, maybe two at most. I prefer more harmonics, more depth, if you get me. Datsik/Excsion basses are a little on the thin side
Soundcloud
lol
that's some

:potkettleblack:

shit

...for serious

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:43 pm
by mks
-w- @ this thread.
Random Eyez wrote:
Basic A wrote:Prediction:
Alpaca pictures.
You know for all the time i've read/posted on this forum i've seen many, many alpacas. In fact i've grown to quite like them.

But I still don't get why people post them.

Is it a dig at someone? Randomness? Or purely for the love of the alpaca?
The way I remember it is people kept spelling Acappella wrong which soon morphed into Alpaca which became a DSF meme for FAIL!

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:53 pm
by 3za
Waste thread is waste.
mks wrote:The way I remember it is people kept spelling Acappella wrong which soon morphed into Alpaca which became a DSF meme for FAIL!
That's the cover-up story, the truth is a lot more darker :twisted:

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:03 pm
by Grime Syndicate
Crosby wrote:
jaydot wrote: I prefer my brostep to have a more complex drum pattern and more depth to the bass. And a little additional melody too. , Datsik tracks I've listened to are always kick, snare...kick...kick...snare.... always 1/3 and the basses aren't that aren't to reploicate... one oscillator in use, maybe two at most. I prefer more harmonics, more depth, if you get me. Datsik/Excsion basses are a little on the thin side
Soundcloud
lol
-w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w- -w-
This thread is JOKES! Thin sounding??? Hahahahaha... Excision and especially Datsik are not my first rated cuppa tea, but they are cups, and good ones at that.

Facts: their production skills are beyond questioning. They're good, I think we can agree on this. They are successful. Their marketing AND production skills are both top notch. They are BOTH really nice, tolerant, and patient.

It's really really easy guys. You don't like em? Don't read the threads and play the tracks. Simples....

And if you wanna be just like em, set your HAM VST to the Datcision patch and put in some work. :5:

Now, back to trying to make teh yuh yuh bass... how do i make teh wobblez again? -q-

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:39 pm
by Kes-Es
therook wrote:ya know the transformer sounds aren't made in a synth...(nor from a movie) will post a sample of what I made when I get home sunday.
I dispute this claim because I have made sounds almost Identical to those in albino.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:47 pm
by ogunslinger
Kes-Es wrote:
therook wrote:ya know the transformer sounds aren't made in a synth...(nor from a movie) will post a sample of what I made when I get home sunday.
I dispute this claim because I have made sounds almost Identical to those in albino.
yea this but with massive

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:54 pm
by Basic A
Kes-Es wrote:
therook wrote:ya know the transformer sounds aren't made in a synth...(nor from a movie) will post a sample of what I made when I get home sunday.
I dispute this claim because I have made sounds almost Identical to those in albino.
Even those guys will tell you there wavetable synths, resampled and automate to fuck and back, layered up with tons of mechanical sounds and sweeps. Its not synthesis alone, the layering is really what makes them on the money, but, the synth work is definately half the battle, IDK how else you think youd make those other then a synth -w-

So lets see everyones best attempts, I was serious when I said that haha. If your in this thread on the calling them out side, you gotta prove you can do it.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:57 pm
by Kes-Es
Basic A wrote:
Kes-Es wrote:
therook wrote:ya know the transformer sounds aren't made in a synth...(nor from a movie) will post a sample of what I made when I get home sunday.
I dispute this claim because I have made sounds almost Identical to those in albino.
Even those guys will tell you there wavetable synths, resampled and automate to fuck and back, layered up with tons of mechanical sounds and sweeps. Its not synthesis alone, the layering is really what makes them on the money, but, the synth work is definately half the battle, IDK how else you think youd make those other then a synth -w-

So lets see everyones best attempts, I was serious when I said that haha. If your in this thread on the calling them out side, you gotta prove you can do it.
I get fair close with about no automation or layering, and I never got hooked on resampling, I'll back this up with a quick loop in a few.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:10 pm
by Basic A
Kes-Es wrote:
Basic A wrote:
Kes-Es wrote:
therook wrote:ya know the transformer sounds aren't made in a synth...(nor from a movie) will post a sample of what I made when I get home sunday.
I dispute this claim because I have made sounds almost Identical to those in albino.
Even those guys will tell you there wavetable synths, resampled and automate to fuck and back, layered up with tons of mechanical sounds and sweeps. Its not synthesis alone, the layering is really what makes them on the money, but, the synth work is definately half the battle, IDK how else you think youd make those other then a synth -w-

So lets see everyones best attempts, I was serious when I said that haha. If your in this thread on the calling them out side, you gotta prove you can do it.
I get fair close with about no automation or layering, and I never got hooked on resampling, I'll back this up with a quick loop in a few.
yeah I believe you haha, but 'close' and 'there' are two different things, and if you lsiten to the tunes with a more crritical ear, everythings layered up, you just convince yourself it isnt and it makes synthesizing harder for you haha.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:15 pm
by Kes-Es
Basic A wrote:
Kes-Es wrote:
Basic A wrote:
Kes-Es wrote:
therook wrote:ya know the transformer sounds aren't made in a synth...(nor from a movie) will post a sample of what I made when I get home sunday.
I dispute this claim because I have made sounds almost Identical to those in albino.
Even those guys will tell you there wavetable synths, resampled and automate to fuck and back, layered up with tons of mechanical sounds and sweeps. Its not synthesis alone, the layering is really what makes them on the money, but, the synth work is definately half the battle, IDK how else you think youd make those other then a synth -w-

So lets see everyones best attempts, I was serious when I said that haha. If your in this thread on the calling them out side, you gotta prove you can do it.
I get fair close with about no automation or layering, and I never got hooked on resampling, I'll back this up with a quick loop in a few.
yeah I believe you haha, but 'close' and 'there' are two different things, and if you lsiten to the tunes with a more crritical ear, everythings layered up, you just convince yourself it isnt and it makes synthesizing harder for you haha.

Why anyone would wanna get "there" and actually apply it anywhere is beyond me, better to get halfway there and then wank on the sound yourself IMHO.

Also:
http://soundcloud.com/kes-es/datsik-sou ... on/s-gNwaX

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:54 pm
by therook
Sounds like albino with #3 filter with the saturation turned up

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:01 am
by Basic A
Kes-Es wrote: Why anyone would wanna get "there" and actually apply it anywhere is beyond me, better to get halfway there and then wank on the sound yourself IMHO.

Also:
http://soundcloud.com/kes-es/datsik-sou ... on/s-gNwaX
better ys, best to learn how to get the whole way there, hit new project, and muck aboutyourself froma sine wave :D:

And nah not quite on the example bro. Good shot though. Definately heard worse patches haha.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:08 am
by Kes-Es
therook wrote:
Sounds like albino with #3 filter with the saturation turned up
Not gonna lie that sounds simpler than it really is, but even saying that, it's pretty elementary shit man. I've got tons of patches like this saved up that make different vowel sounds and shit, all straight out of albino just using envelopes and onboard effects. I mean people flip shit about it, but the sounds aren't exactly stupid hard to get in the direct ballpark of, it's harder to use them in a way that works IMHO and that's where Datsik gets it.

Doesn't fit with my style at all, I just think they sound really neat and that if I keep making them, one day I'll get asked to do a transformers movie...

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:11 am
by Kes-Es
Basic A wrote:
Kes-Es wrote: Why anyone would wanna get "there" and actually apply it anywhere is beyond me, better to get halfway there and then wank on the sound yourself IMHO.

Also:
http://soundcloud.com/kes-es/datsik-sou ... on/s-gNwaX
better ys, best to learn how to get the whole way there, hit new project, and muck aboutyourself froma sine wave :D:

And nah not quite on the example bro. Good shot though. Definately heard worse patches haha.
I just clicked the first patch in my "robot farts" patch folder and laid out a riff, but I'm glad I got not quite as opposed to not at all.

Re: FAO you Datsik/Excision wannabes

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:39 am
by sixth sense
Crosby wrote:
jaydot wrote: I prefer my brostep to have a more complex drum pattern and more depth to the bass. And a little additional melody too. , Datsik tracks I've listened to are always kick, snare...kick...kick...snare.... always 1/3 and the basses aren't that aren't to reploicate... one oscillator in use, maybe two at most. I prefer more harmonics, more depth, if you get me. Datsik/Excsion basses are a little on the thin side
Soundcloud
lol
After listening to that I would be embarrassed to be you. :baby:

Were you under the influence while making this thread, I sure hope so.