lovelydivot wrote:You know - I really want to explain ...
But part of their genius - Is when you have finally lived and thought enough to get it...
That epiphanous moment when your own mind reveals something really funny in the driest way...
Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
- syrup
- Reigning Mini-Mix King
- Posts: 8351
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:18 pm
- Location: down in my heart
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
pull that shit upgarethom wrote:that's a banger painting man, big up.murky21 wrote:haha I'm just pulling your leg. sure u know more about those dudes than most (certainly me)
That turner is a beaut. Definitely a heavyweight of the abstract game.
Rain Steam and Speed is also a percy
dubfordessert wrote:you can jizz on me if you want
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
not really, for some pieces it's like asking if a sine wave playing for 2 seconds every 3 minutes for an hour is music.jorge wrote:Its kind of like asking is electronic music really music
Soundcloud
TopManLurka wrote:sycophants gon sycophant.
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
how is this a thread in 2013
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
yeah for some pieces, and your welcome to question whether they are art or if that is music but it doesn't say anything about abstract art or electronic music in general.Mason wrote:not really, for some pieces it's like asking if a sine wave playing for 2 seconds every 3 minutes for an hour is music.jorge wrote:Its kind of like asking is electronic music really music
No analogy is perfect but I think that one is pretty good, specially considering there is a degree of abstraction to most electronic music.
anyway this discussion is a couple of centuries too late and even then it was silly.
lets just look at pictures
Kandinsky is one of my favourites, think he was inspired alot by music aswell.

Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
Bun Kadinsky man, all his stuff looks like an opening screen for Encarta.
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
Yes.
That is music.Mason wrote:not really, for some pieces it's like asking if a sine wave playing for 2 seconds every 3 minutes for an hour is music.jorge wrote:Its kind of like asking is electronic music really music
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
Read about how loads of the impressionist artists had eye problems that probably meant their paintings where closer to what they actually saw than we think.
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
I went to one of the gallerys, and there was a bin that they had to put some barrier around cos it was actually a piece, and people kept putting rubbish in it thinking it was a real bin

OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
maybe that was the intention, that people would mistake it for a bin & contribute to the piece?skimpi wrote:I went to one of the gallerys, and there was a bin that they had to put some barrier around cos it was actually a piece, and people kept putting rubbish in it thinking it was a real bin![]()
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowercase_(music)Mason wrote:not really, for some pieces it's like asking if a sine wave playing for 2 seconds every 3 minutes for an hour is music.jorge wrote:Its kind of like asking is electronic music really music
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
Are the two Turners that have been posted considered abstract? They look pretty realistic to me, if a bit stylised. You know, sorta like a photo captured through a number of lenses, filters, blurry glass panes and then processed in a certain way. Wouldn't a photo like that be just considered photography instead of abstract photography?
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
why would they put a barrier round it though? just had a couple bits of gum stuck to the bottom of itcloquet wrote:maybe that was the intention, that people would mistake it for a bin & contribute to the piece?skimpi wrote:I went to one of the gallerys, and there was a bin that they had to put some barrier around cos it was actually a piece, and people kept putting rubbish in it thinking it was a real bin![]()
At the same exhibition, there was like some clothes on show and a live model just standing there wearing one of them. Turns out she was only there for a couple hours one day a week and happened to be the time i was there.
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
- lovelydivot
- Posts: 2265
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:44 pm
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
I had fun in the art museum just last week - I took one of my little cousins Jacob - a 6 year old...
and in the Duchamp room - They have that piece set up where you have to peek through a hole in a door...
and it a voyeuristic thing - you see some gash...
and I spent like 20 minutes in there with him going back and forth...
him wanting to see - then not wanting because he was "scared"...
I told him I'd lift him up if he really wanted to know...
but we decided to go back next year instead - and maybe he would be ready to see then...
I was laughing the whole time...
He loved the Cy Twombly room...all kids seem to love Cy Twombly
this is exactly where we were sitting...

and in the Duchamp room - They have that piece set up where you have to peek through a hole in a door...
and it a voyeuristic thing - you see some gash...
and I spent like 20 minutes in there with him going back and forth...
him wanting to see - then not wanting because he was "scared"...
I told him I'd lift him up if he really wanted to know...
but we decided to go back next year instead - and maybe he would be ready to see then...
I was laughing the whole time...
He loved the Cy Twombly room...all kids seem to love Cy Twombly
this is exactly where we were sitting...
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
you mean stuff like mark rothko? yea
teebs makes art as well that i'd consider pretty abstract

teebs makes art as well that i'd consider pretty abstract

Last edited by hifi on Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
but firstly answer my mine : (magma wrote:Yes, next question.
- extremesociety
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:21 pm
- Location: Brooklyn.
- Contact:
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
Yes.
/thread
/thread
///// New EP ///// Download for free here: http://www.nitemute.com
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society
http://soundcloud.com/rvlouie
Soundcloud
http://soundcloud.com/extreme-society
http://soundcloud.com/rvlouie
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
though hieronymus bosch was next level for 15th century renaissance/early netherlandish art. surreal before surrealism




Last edited by hifi on Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Do you think abstract art should be considered art?
anyone got any abstract surrealism
Hexagon Album Coming 23rd January 2016
Soundcloud
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hexagon-D ... 5406280511
https://soundcloud.com/hexagon-dubs
Soundcloud
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hexagon-D ... 5406280511
https://soundcloud.com/hexagon-dubs
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


