Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
i just don't get how people get so butthurt over it surely there are better things to get angry over
nowaysj wrote:Only came back to tell Maxon he is a little cnut
wolf89 wrote:I look like an idiot
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
have you thought about sending them a strongly worded letter in protest








Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Too many 'liberals' who think white knighting is the only way they'll stand out.mason666 wrote:i just don't get how people get so butthurt over it surely there are better things to get angry over

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
init
i really don't get what people get out of getting him fired
i really don't get what people get out of getting him fired
nowaysj wrote:Only came back to tell Maxon he is a little cnut
wolf89 wrote:I look like an idiot
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
mason666 wrote:init
i really don't get what people get out of getting him fired
Society as a whole seems to jump from one scapegoat to another
Focussing in hatred of a celebrity helps people forget the inadequacies in their own life

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Probs not butthurt, a lot of people hate him though so this is the perfect excuse to kick up a fuss going TOLD YA, HES A tnuc! Same thing happened with Suarez, that would never have created the hype it did if it was anybody else.. but cause hes a prick it was just what tha haterz wanted to make some noise.mason666 wrote:i just don't get how people get so butthurt over it surely there are better things to get angry over
-
Reese_Liar
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:51 pm
- Location: Copenhagen
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
That's true, it's not a dictatorship, but the director general has internal rules and guidelines to follow, just as every other employee. He has to treat Clarkson as just another employee or the very foundation of the whole organisation starts to fall apart.soronery wrote:
A general who does not listen to the public voice is a dictator
The bbc is not a dictatorship.
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
We've gone circular here it seemsMuncey wrote:Probs not butthurt, a lot of people hate him though so this is the perfect excuse to kick up a fuss going TOLD YA, HES A tnuc!mason666 wrote:i just don't get how people get so butthurt over it surely there are better things to get angry over
If people think Clarkson is a tnuc, then don't watch him.
The mass media has seen to it that there are enough channels to choose from, surely people can avoid the ne he's on for however long he's on for.

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Nah we haven't gone circular cause I said before in a discussion about liking someone (or thinking they're a tnuc) saying "don't watch him" is perfectly valid. Discussing whether his actions were right or wrong and whether the conclusions were right or wrong has nothing to do with whether people watch him or not. My point was loads of people don't like him.. so if he does fuck up, people will jump on it.soronery wrote:We've gone circular here it seemsMuncey wrote:Probs not butthurt, a lot of people hate him though so this is the perfect excuse to kick up a fuss going TOLD YA, HES A tnuc!mason666 wrote:i just don't get how people get so butthurt over it surely there are better things to get angry over
If people think Clarkson is a tnuc, then don't watch him.
The mass media has seen to it that there are enough channels to choose from, surely people can avoid the ne he's on for however long he's on for.
Moral of the story: if you're gunna be a tnuc, don't get caught slippin' G
-
Reese_Liar
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:51 pm
- Location: Copenhagen
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
I'm gonna refer back to the article I posted. I think everybody should have fair and equal treatment, and it's only right he gets fired for physically and verbally abusing a colleague, just as every other employed person in the history of jobs and working would be.
You can choose to not watch Top Gear and still have an opinion about how the BBC treats its workers.
You can choose to not watch Top Gear and still have an opinion about how the BBC treats its workers.
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
Tbh the most depressing thing is that more people signed a petition on this than real issues. I suppose public apathy is nothing new though.
Shum wrote:Yeah big up Jesus for dying for our sins and netting us a public holiday in the process.Nevalo wrote:not much todo at work today.... and once ive finished, ITS THE FUCKIN LONG WEEKEND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Also, hot cross buns.
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
You two gents constantly forget the idea that one (with social standards) could want others not to be subjected to this 'stealthily racially toned classicist operation' that bbc have had going for years relating to automobiles 
OGLemon wrote:cowabunga dude
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-music-of-moby
fragments wrote:SWEEEEEEEEE!
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-t ... o-sweeeeee
Johnlenham wrote:evil euroland
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
not up to me what the Mindless Minions Of Lundee chose to watch to pass the timehubb wrote:You two gents constantly forget the idea that one (with social standards) could want others not to be subjected to this 'stealthily racially toned classicist operation' that bbc have had going for years relating to automobiles
freedom of ch0ice and all that

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
I mean you outright neglect that as the principle for even having the discussion, which is probably all those againsts' main issue
the climate topgear urges on
You are basicly saying: I'm not meant to care about others
the climate topgear urges on
You are basicly saying: I'm not meant to care about others
Last edited by hubb on Fri Mar 27, 2015 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OGLemon wrote:cowabunga dude
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-music-of-moby
fragments wrote:SWEEEEEEEEE!
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-t ... o-sweeeeee
Johnlenham wrote:evil euroland
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
when it comes to what they watch on tvhubb wrote:You are basicly saying: Im not meant to care about others
i dont give a shit

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
exposed to via public funded tv *what they watch on tv
OGLemon wrote:cowabunga dude
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-music-of-moby
fragments wrote:SWEEEEEEEEE!
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-t ... o-sweeeeee
Johnlenham wrote:evil euroland
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
no one is forced to watch anythinghubb wrote:exposed to via public funded tv *what they watch on tv
dont like something, dont watch it

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
It's obviously about protecting those that only need a slight push to become more of a concervative racist or whatever - that poor rightwing segment that loves the class system
- people who are right on the verge of thinking the opinions expressed aren't jokes
those who might not see a joke for a joke, but just side with a upperclass super lad that doesn't have to respect anything and who could buy an island and just fuck off, because he is on tv
- people who are right on the verge of thinking the opinions expressed aren't jokes
those who might not see a joke for a joke, but just side with a upperclass super lad that doesn't have to respect anything and who could buy an island and just fuck off, because he is on tv
OGLemon wrote:cowabunga dude
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-music-of-moby
fragments wrote:SWEEEEEEEEE!
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-t ... o-sweeeeee
Johnlenham wrote:evil euroland
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
it is not the fault of a tv channel (any channel for that matter) to have to think on behalf of their viewershubb wrote:It's obviously about protecting those that only need a slight push to become more of a concervative racist or whatever - that poor rightwing segment that loves the class system
- people who are right on the verge of thinking the opinions expressed aren't jokes
those who might not see a joke for a joke, but just side with a upperclass super lad that doesn't have to respect anything and who could buy an island and just fuck off, because he is on tv
if someone is watching top gear (for example) and taking it deadly serious then more fool them
we cant sugercoat everything with disclaimers because the general populace aren't drawing the 'right' conclusions about a show's tone

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness
DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary
_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO
Re: Should Jeremy Clarkson be allowed to assault people?
no but it can be stopped like it just has been which was correct empatic behaviour from a public funded servicewe cant sugercoat everything with disclaimers because the general populace aren't drawing the 'right' conclusions about a show's tone
cant spread sugarcoated hatred anymore
see what i did there ?
The only way we can make dumb people less dumb, is if we put in place stuff to make sure someone isn't deliberately going for them. That could be an idea of cooperate responsibility if common sense or decency has been thrown out the window like you seem to assume it has.
Last edited by hubb on Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OGLemon wrote:cowabunga dude
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-music-of-moby
fragments wrote:SWEEEEEEEEE!
https://soundcloud.com/qloo/cowabunga-t ... o-sweeeeee
Johnlenham wrote:evil euroland
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests