Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 4:37 pm
who cares if it was?Grievous Angel wrote: When nine dropped Prince, was that dubstep?
defo it was one of the best DJ warm-ups i've ever heard

worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
who cares if it was?Grievous Angel wrote: When nine dropped Prince, was that dubstep?
agreed.Gutter wrote:that's the ticket. purism is inherently fascist. blend the strengths. mutate. metamorphasise. don't think about it too much. if the beats are moving you, then just go with the flow. for me dubstep was always about revitalising 'Dance Muzik' in its broadest sense. its a creative stepping-off point for lots of interesting avenues of exploration.seckle wrote: we need more open minded music lovers and less microscopic analysis of the music.
In the words of Winston Churchill:autonomic wrote: yes! good good! let's move on now before people start forming committees
Gutta nails it!seckle wrote:Gutter wrote:that's the ticket. purism is inherently fascist. blend the strengths. mutate. metamorphasise. don't think about it too much. if the beats are moving you, then just go with the flow. for me dubstep was always about revitalising 'Dance Muzik' in its broadest sense. its a creative stepping-off point for lots of interesting avenues of exploration.seckle wrote: we need more open minded music lovers and less microscopic analysis of the music.
Dubmuggas friend, huh???pollywog wrote:we have a prophet in our midstBOW DOWN. I got an idea, why don't you start a thread instead of constantly pissing in every one elses?
That seems to be a laughable statement in itself. It seems to go completely against the whole ethic of what this music is about - which is to push the boundaries and explore possibilities.Blackdown wrote:it's laughable what people tag as dubstep these days
werdpete bubonic wrote:I die a little inside everytime I read a review or thread saying this or that isn't dubstep. If you'd believe Blackdown, anything not out of the DMZ camp and without his seal of approval isn't Dubstep. A lot of these heads seem to eager to point out the history and how they were on it from day. Yes there will always be and needs to be classifications of what is what, every single one of our brains is wired up to do that whether we like it or not. But what militant pigeon holing brehs don't realise, is dubstep isn't just the Croydon/south london crew beats anymore, there's a whole world out there and the face and sound of Dubstep is changing and evolving with every release. I'm not denying it's history and certainly not denying any respect to anyone who has contributed to the scene, only pointing out that it is changing and will continue to do. You can either get hung up on calling a 138 halfsteppa with an extra ghost snare in it 'breakstep' or not.
you know it! http://www.nationaldayofslayer.org/MRJIGGYFLY wrote:
Definitely Dubstep![]()