Any camera headz in the place?

ashley · Post by **ashley** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:51 pm

the whole reason i want a dslr is for manual focus

fooishbar · Post by **fooishbar** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:48 pm

Ashley wrote:the whole reason i want a dslr is for manual focus

then you want to be looking for something with interchangeable screens and making sure your lenses support ftm.

ashley · Post by **ashley** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:00 pm

fooishbar wrote:
Ashley wrote:the whole reason i want a dslr is for manual focus
then you want to be looking for something with interchangeable screens and making sure your lenses support ftm.

Well the main reason being a few times at the past DMZ's my camera would have to wait for it to auto focus before the photo takes, missing key moments.

ashley · Post by **ashley** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:00 pm

Whats ftm?

elbe · Post by **elbe** » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:08 pm

Dead Rats wrote:
eLBe wrote:
Dead Rats wrote:Why don't you go for a Samsung instead? They're basically the same thing, they're made in the same factory by the same people.

GX20 is a better camera than both, but it's a bit big.
Yeah? might look into that then.

this all still depends on if I can justify spending this kinda dollar to myself
Why not go for a used one? We've just taken a Samsung GX20 in part-ex at our shop, and'll be selling it for peanuts, not much past £300.

yeah thats what I'm looking, still thats A LOT of peanuts

fooishbar · Post by **fooishbar** » Sat Oct 18, 2008 11:59 am

Ashley wrote:
fooishbar wrote:
Ashley wrote:the whole reason i want a dslr is for manual focus
then you want to be looking for something with interchangeable screens and making sure your lenses support ftm.
Well the main reason being a few times at the past DMZ's my camera would have to wait for it to auto focus before the photo takes, missing key moments.

depends on your camera's AF, the amount of light, and your lens too. for instance, most canon lenses can focus okay, but the 50mm f/1.8 can't AF on a single thing when wide open. af on most decent cameras is pretty quick, provided you aren't using a flash.

Ashley wrote:Whats ftm?

full-time manual. autofocus in the general case, but even in af mode you can adjust the focus manually.

theaccuria · Post by **theaccuria** » Sat Oct 18, 2008 12:11 pm

My eyes generally arnt good enough to use manual focus, i usually use AF with the 9 point focus system thing and choose what part of the image I want in focus that way.

but the reason I use a DSLR is for the range of ISO (stupidly high to low), the ability to do certain things like curtain sync your flash, propperly expose photographs the way you want them, control depth of field 100% etc etc etc

I'm aware most of this you can do on modern day compacts but you still dont get the 100% control like you do with a SLR camera.

zoso · Post by **zoso** » Sun Oct 19, 2008 4:29 am

I actually think this would be really good for a first DSLR.. I've seen some great results out of it too.. can get amazing focus/limited depth of field from quite wide apertures too (so if you're in a low lighting environment you can still achieve the same results) and it comes with two quite ranged lenses.

Anyways if I had been starting out..I'd start with something like this, good price too

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_secti ... oduct=1295

arrows · Post by **arrows** » Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:01 am

I used to have a Canon EOS-1D until my shit got jacked...

Lenses were: EF 20-35, 75-300, and a Sigma fixed 150 f/2.8 Macro.

http://gallery.mac.com/darinsalerno
That's my portfolio. I do a lot of Rave/EDM Event photography... well... did.. >=[

n9_n9_n9 · Post by **n9_n9_n9** » Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:40 pm

im an absolute neek when it comes to cameras so forgive the idiocy if/when appears.

im looking for a compact camera, preferably a not so expensive one. what im gonna be using that for - mainly filming, mainly at night. and the video has to have sound to it too, preferably of a decent/good standard aswell. taking pictures of course too, but thats less important.

would be great to hear someone whos into this. concrete models, models to avoid, features to have an eye for when looking around etc.

please

fooishbar · Post by **fooishbar** » Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:25 am

Arrows wrote:I used to have a Canon EOS-1D until my shit got jacked...
Lenses were: EF 20-35, 75-300, and a Sigma fixed 150 f/2.8 Macro.

http://gallery.mac.com/darinsalerno
That's my portfolio. I do a lot of Rave/EDM Event photography... well... did.. >=[

sorry to hear it.

prolife · Post by **prolife** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:23 pm

Thinking about dipping in to the market for a DSLR. Mainly for personal use as I've wanted a good SLR for fucking months, but also for my college work too.
Been looking at the Nikon D60:
http://www.jessops.com/Store/s73580/1-1 ... tails.aspx
And the Canon E-1000D:
http://www.jessops.com/Store/s75075/1-1 ... tails.aspx

Anyone care to shed some light on pros or cons of each? or what type of lenses I would be looking at? I'm a complete N00b tbh.
Would be used for alot of cityscape/landscape photography and would preferably like something with a good range of shutter speeds and manual focus.

theaccuria · Post by **theaccuria** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:01 pm

Get the Nikon if you can afford it

Even tho I use Canon and love it too bits, the 1000D is like propper propper budget system thing and I think even i'd rather use the Nikon.

zoso · Post by **zoso** » Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:40 am

I have read good reviews on the 1000D but If you're going to fork out the dollars for the 1000D then go the 450D I'd say..

Dead Rats · Post by **Dead Rats** » Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:43 am

Everyone I've spoken to who's bought a 1000D regret it.

d-T-r · Post by **d-T-r** » Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:37 pm

student loan bullshit is finally on its way to being sorted. before i waste most of it on various substances, i figure i should buy some useful shit first...including a camera.

ideally, i dont really wanna be spending any more than £250 and i wouldnt rule out something second hand either.

i had my eye on this one:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fuji-FinePix-S9 ... 412&sr=1-4

mainly because i've used the 6.3mb version earlier this year. also, it'll be my first camera but i dont wanna get something i'll out grow too soon but at the same time, i wont be doing 'seriously' enough to fork out loads.

i know nikon's,sony's and cannons are rated more aswell so if there's any similiar priced ones worth checkng or if anyone know of any better places to buy them, lens' for future purchases etc let me know.

most of the pictures i took with the borrowed fuji are here. some photoshopping on some of them also:

http://d-t-r.deviantart.com/gallery/

Dead Rats · Post by **Dead Rats** » Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:17 pm

Fuji 9600's are sweet cameras, good for someone coming onto SLR's.

A bit shite in low-light, and the LCD is small, but it's still pretty good.

d-T-r · Post by **d-T-r** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:17 pm

Dead Rats wrote:Fuji 9600's are sweet cameras, good for someone coming onto SLR's.

A bit shite in low-light, and the LCD is small, but it's still pretty good.

student loan came. ended up ordering a nikon d40 today.will hopefully have a productive and creative winter.

[/quote]

kaatr · Post by **kaatr** » Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:51 am

I bout a Canon EOS 450D today with a lens and £50 cash back from Canon, cost a little over £400.

felixgash · Post by **felixgash** » Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:41 am

kaatr wrote:I bout a Canon EOS 450D today with a lens and £50 cash back from Canon, cost a little over £400.

Great choice.

Still get depressed remembering my bag with macbook/450d/wallet/my life getting stolen this summer.

Any camera headz in the place?

Who is online