Surface_Tension wrote:
Can I ask what it is about these particular companies having their name attached that makes it bad?
red bull is most likely terribly unhealthy. they sell a product 1/3 the size, for double the price, and its fucking crap. they are a drug dealer, end of. to each their own, but if you wanna know the bad..
scion is toyota, and the automobile industry and the oil industry it supports are filthy and ruthless..
i honestly dont want either in my life, or my music, but i understand capitalism.
Surface_Tension wrote:I've seen a lot of dope DJ's I wouldn't have seen if they didn't sponsor the show, and that's just the truth there. Sometimes they are necessary because DJ's don't play for free. Until they do and flights don't cost money, sponsors will exist. 
thanks for promoter 101, and no you are wrong they are never NECESSARY and i absolutely refuse to give them any credit for any good times ive had, they are simply brandswith money to burn, all respect is due to the ARTISTS and party people, who do this shit with or without logos.
Surface_Tension wrote:Even then they will exist, because motherfuckers are cheap and lazy and can get the free help. All you have to do is peddle a drink, which people are free to buy. I don't see people selling Scion's at shows though, just having mixes put out and names on flyers... which hurts what?
because motherfuckers are cheap & lazy is a good thing how?
and thats the point with them NOT selling scions at shows, and why this type of marketing concerns me...
with a song used in a advert or something like that, its clear they are usingsomething to sell something, which is fine and dandy as long as the artist get paid....
with the red bull scion model theyve positioned themselves to not just sell you stuff, but sell you YOUR OWN CULTURE with a brand attatched, and to them, it purely marketing when it comes down to it, and it shows..