worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
If only we all supported a traditionally second rate side when it got bought by one of Russia's shadiest oligarchs, eh?rockonin wrote:I love all the anti Chelsea biasery on here. Should we win the Champions league it'll make it soooooo much sweeter. We can potentially win our second champions league trophy, while Arsenal could win A trophy in 9 years hahahahaha
Same old excuses over and over again.magma wrote:
If only we all supported a traditionally second rate side when it got bought by one of Russia's shadiest oligarchs, eh?
murky21 wrote:if it's 1 - 0 to chelsea im giving up football
You're better than that.magma wrote:If only we all supported a traditionally second rate side when it got bought by one of Russia's shadiest oligarchs, eh?
If you started supporting Chelsea after 2002 and you're not from West London you really can swivel on your pointiest trophy.
The truth rarely ceases being true. Chelsea have had some truly great players over the last 10 years and Mourinho is an amazing manager, but as a club they're just new money scumbags from a rich scumbag's post code. Fuck Chelsea as a place, population and as a motherfucking football club. And if you're down with Chelsea....rockonin wrote:Same old excuses over and over again.magma wrote:
If only we all supported a traditionally second rate side when it got bought by one of Russia's shadiest oligarchs, eh?
Oh, find a sense of humour you joyless cunt. It's only football banter.Muncey wrote:You're better than that.magma wrote:If only we all supported a traditionally second rate side when it got bought by one of Russia's shadiest oligarchs, eh?
If you started supporting Chelsea after 2002 and you're not from West London you really can swivel on your pointiest trophy.
Chill out, its only football banter.magma wrote:Oh, find a sense of humour you joyless cunt. It's only football banter.Muncey wrote:You're better than that.magma wrote:If only we all supported a traditionally second rate side when it got bought by one of Russia's shadiest oligarchs, eh?
If you started supporting Chelsea after 2002 and you're not from West London you really can swivel on your pointiest trophy.
Domestic Competitions
League
La Liga:[6] 32 (record)
1931–32, 1932–33, 1953–54, 1954–55, 1956–57, 1957–58, 1960–61, 1961–62, 1962–63, 1963–64, 1964–65, 1966–67, 1967–68, 1968–69, 1971–72, 1974–75, 1975–76, 1977–78, 1978–79, 1979–80, 1985–86, 1986–87, 1987–88, 1988–89, 1989–90, 1994–95, 1996–97, 2000–01, 2002–03, 2006–07, 2007–08, 2011–12
Cup
Copa del Rey:[6] 19
1905, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1917, 1934, 1936, 1946, 1947, 1961–62, 1969–70, 1973–74, 1974–75, 1979–80, 1981–82, 1988–89, 1992–93, 2010–11, 2013–14
Supercopa de España:[6] 9
1988, 1989*, 1990, 1993, 1997, 2001, 2003, 2008, 2012
(* Won Copa del Rey and La Liga)
European Competitions
European Cup / UEFA Champions League:[6] 9 (record)
1955–56*, 1956–57, 1957–58, 1958–59, 1959–60, 1965–66, 1997–98, 1999–2000, 2001–02
(* First ever winners)
UEFA Cup:[6] 2
1984–85, 1985–86
UEFA Super Cup:[6] 1
2002
He got replaced by Vialli player managerhubb wrote:Gullit as a playing manager was dope
Because it's more about economic behaviour, media and politics than it is about history. Madrid have been complete stnuc in every sence since the galacticos period imo. They shit on almost everyone of their good players down the line.How can Madrid be compared to Chelsea? They one of the biggest, if not the biggest team in the world:
rockonin wrote:Yeah but do you think that if the money clubs had not invested heavily that the Premier League would be the best in the world today. Lets face it the investment in players has made the league what it is.
Division One was at least as exciting as the Premiership, but the Premiership was the most watched league in the world way before Abramovich got on the scene and decided that even Manchester United were being too 'sensible' with their Sky money... bidding wars for TV rights created 'the best league in the world' and then Russian oil money turned it into a plaything for the rich and vainglorious.rockonin wrote:Yeah but do you think that if the money clubs had not invested heavily that the Premier League would be the best in the world today. Lets face it the investment in players has made the league what it is.