Interracial teenage orgy

[alien pimp]

Nah, bad will would be someone who cared about logical thought letting this sort of thing spread around unchecked.

You don't get a free pass to post whatever you want, I'm afraid... doesn't work like that on a public board. Preach to the converted if you want an easy sell... but if you want to convert rational people, you're going to have to try a little bit harder.

bad will is to do something you say yourself looks bad
especially when the OP tells you he's not talking about what are you talking and you keep going on your own. would it be cool to start talking about birds in your 20 years thread?

[magma]

If it's a valid criticism of my post on the news that 20 years have passed since the falling of the Berlin Wall, I imagine it'd be fine. I've given you several decent reasons why the whole premise of your initial post here is shaky. It seems people largely agree with those criticisms and have added their own 2p's worth along the way. I'm not sure why you need to focus us on a different sentence all of a sudden. The first post is unfounded scaremongering, it got rightly called out by several people. Now you're just deseperate to get the conversation finished so more people don't see.

I'm not sure you're going to find a way to dispute that the Berlin Wall was taken down 20 years ago this week with talk of "birds", though. Do you mean "birds" ornithologically or letchingly?

[magma]

And anyway, I thought you were putting me on ignore so that you didn't have to be confronted with me *shock horror* disagreeing with something you say?

I think you must like these little spats really!

[alien pimp]

If it's a valid criticism of my post on the news that 20 years have passed since the falling of the Berlin Wall, I imagine it'd be fine

how would you know if it's valid, you can't read and you are the kind of person that argues forever over things that the OP doesn't mean or care about?!

[magma]

If it's a valid criticism of my post on the news that 20 years have passed since the falling of the Berlin Wall, I imagine it'd be fine

how would you know if it's valid, you can't read and you are the kind of person that argues forever over things that the OP doesn't mean or care about?!

Why don't you care that noone sees anything sinister in your first post? Why would you post it if you don't care about it?!

[magma]

If it's a valid criticism of my post on the news that 20 years have passed since the falling of the Berlin Wall, I imagine it'd be fine

how would you know if it's valid, you can't read and you are the kind of person that argues forever over things that the OP doesn't mean or care about?!

And lovely insults again, thankyou. It's so much easier to argue with someone who never makes a point.

[alien pimp]

If it's a valid criticism of my post on the news that 20 years have passed since the falling of the Berlin Wall, I imagine it'd be fine

how would you know if it's valid, you can't read and you are the kind of person that argues forever over things that the OP doesn't mean or care about?!

And lovely insults again, thankyou. It's so much easier to argue with someone who never makes a point.

i'm sorry truth is insulting for you, but that's no wonder, you're the kind of person that argues over 5 pages over a point that you say yourself was never made, and not before you say you are on point. so you are the kind of person that is on point when the point was never made. sorry if this insults you, it's the side effect of acting like you act

[magma]

So you weren't trying to unfairly make out IBM to be an evil company afterall?

Just what were you trying to say?

You show us rubbish about them being prepared for pandemics. - people inform you most companies do this.

You try to argue that they predict with 100% certainty that there will be a pandemic before 2011. - people explain the difference between prediction and assumption.

You try and insist that pandemics have only been news since 2007 - you are informed that humans have been worried about pandemics all the way through the 20th century and much further back.

You make references to IBM being involved with sizan. - this holds no relevance in 2009. Hitler died 64 years ago!

What else were you trying to say that we've missed? There must have been some nuggets of sense in here somewhere...

[alien pimp]

So you weren't trying to unfairly make out IBM to be an evil company afterall?

Just what were you trying to say?

You show us rubbish about them being prepared for pandemics. - people inform you most companies do this.

You try to argue that they predict with 100% certainty that there will be a pandemic before 2011. - people explain the difference between prediction and assumption.

You try and insist that pandemics have only been news since 2007 - you are informed that humans have been worried about pandemics all the way through the 20th century and much further back.

You make references to IBM being involved with sizan. - this holds no relevance in 2009. Hitler died 64 years ago!

What else were you trying to say that we've missed? There must have been some nuggets of sense in here somewhere...

what to answer a guy who fights for 5 pagesa point he says it was never made and then asks you: what else i've missed?

and all that while he claims he's the logic police around and it's his duty to check all threads for that...

[magma]

I think my work here is more than done.

You carry on convincing people of this all you like.

[the acid never lies]

So you weren't trying to unfairly make out IBM to be an evil company afterall?

Just what were you trying to say?

You show us rubbish about them being prepared for pandemics. - people inform you most companies do this.

You try to argue that they predict with 100% certainty that there will be a pandemic before 2011. - people explain the difference between prediction and assumption.

You try and insist that pandemics have only been news since 2007 - you are informed that humans have been worried about pandemics all the way through the 20th century and much further back.

You make references to IBM being involved with sizan. - this holds no relevance in 2009. Hitler died 64 years ago!

What else were you trying to say that we've missed? There must have been some nuggets of sense in here somewhere...

It would really help your case AP if you didn't respond to people with so much contempt - obviously I am not the only person who is baffled by your behaviour so please do us the favour of not assuming we are hopeless idiots and state your case in a rational way and not just pointing to your original post or making claims that we 'can't read'.

I have a feeling this thread can only go in circles now but I hope I'm wrong

[alien pimp]

It would really help your case AP if you didn't respond to people with so much contempt - obviously I am not the only person who is baffled by your behaviour so please do us the favour of not assuming we are hopeless idiots and state your case in a rational way and not just pointing to your original post or making claims that we 'can't read'.

I have a feeling this thread can only go in circles now but I hope I'm wrong

i would need your help if i wasn't attacked by people like the one described above, tell me i lied about anything and those are not his facts/words

[alien pimp]

So you weren't trying to unfairly make out IBM to be an evil company afterall?

Just what were you trying to say?

You show us rubbish about them being prepared for pandemics. - people inform you most companies do this.

You try to argue that they predict with 100% certainty that there will be a pandemic before 2011. - people explain the difference between prediction and assumption.

You try and insist that pandemics have only been news since 2007 - you are informed that humans have been worried about pandemics all the way through the 20th century and much further back.

You make references to IBM being involved with sizan. - this holds no relevance in 2009. Hitler died 64 years ago!

What else were you trying to say that we've missed? There must have been some nuggets of sense in here somewhere...

It would really help your case AP if you didn't respond to people with so much contempt - obviously I am not the only person who is baffled by your behaviour so please do us the favour of not assuming we are hopeless idiots and state your case in a rational way and not just pointing to your original post or making claims that we 'can't read'.

I have a feeling this thread can only go in circles now but I hope I'm wrong

you like bolding questions answered repeatedly with answers bolded by myself long time ago, only so you prove you can't read either? so how would you be able to help me, because you know the reading-challenged people's language or something?

[kins83]

I've just remembered the Foe list.

[alien pimp]

i know how you can slap my arrogant face: ignore me!

[faust.dtc]

I've just remembered the Foe list.

Luckily I remembered it yesterday and have added my first name to it. Does make for some strange reading now but its less of a headache than it was...

[the acid never lies]

you like bolding questions answered repeatedly with answers bolded by myself long time ago

Perhaps because I don't consider that the question has been answered satifactorily? Sorry but you don't seem to answer anyone's questions head on - there's only so much I can question my own judgement before assuming that it's you that's missing something here.

Oh and good job alienating people who are actually interested to see where you are coming from.

That is all

[alien pimp]

you like bolding questions answered repeatedly with answers bolded by myself long time ago

Perhaps because I don't consider that the question has been answered satifactorily? Sorry but you don't seem to answer anyone's questions head on - there's only so much I can question my own judgement before assuming that it's you that's missing something here.

for sure you still don't know what the answer was or at least what it means, even thought it's very simple
you knew better man, you just got caught in magma's game, beware or soon you'll start talking his style: i don't find the answer satisfactory, because i don't know where to find it. but i like arguing it, it's easier

[alien pimp]

Oh and good job alienating people who are actually interested to see where you are coming from.

That is all

ah, so you see me managing to alienate them??
because i see myself fighting hard to alienate people who are not able nor bother to read and understand what they are talking about and i'm not succeeding at all. and no one ever interested will actually bother with the thread anymore because 3 lads fucked it up

[magma]

Why wouldn't you explain your point to people who are genuinely asking for more information? I can understand you getting annoyed with me (you get annoyed most times I speak at the moment)... but, to be honest, it looked like Acid Never Lies was trying to give you a chance to explain your point properly.

I don't think anyone quite understands what you think IBM have done wrong. I've read your posts and I still can't see it. You're either making nonsensical points or perhaps you're just not explaining yourself very well.... so with no prejudice on my part - what is wrong with IBM's actions in your opinion?

If you answered this one question your thread would be back on track.

What have IBM done wrong?