Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:32 pm
not everyone is a reptile / hologram d00d, only happens to them
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Our world may be a giant hologram
Page 5 of 22
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:34 pm
eh?
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:35 pm
hackman wrote:hackman wrote:why always the face then?
and certain people, not others?
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:47 pm
oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
obviously you and i know why
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:51 pm
oh lol, were you questioning lloydnoise?
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:52 pm
ja ja
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:54 pm
If u learn about the cameras they are using im sure u would find out why. They have like face detection on or somthing? I dont have a clue but there are much more believable reasons than them all being giant lizzards
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:55 pm
but i am a reptilian so i know its true...
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:56 pm
We could all be lizards, we just don't know it yet.
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:59 pm
no one knows if they are 'reptiles', it's mainly the theory of them being something other than a homosapienConic wrote:If u learn about the cameras they are using im sure u would find out why. They have like face detection on or somthing? I dont have a clue but there are much more believable reasons than them all being giant lizzards
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:10 pm
I can't stand your crazy conspiracy stuff Parson but that is some eloquant shit right there. bigup.parson wrote:my personal philosophy regarding the fundamental human condition is that we are all God forgetting ourselves in different ways. and that each of us has a little formula for amnesia. and everybody's amnesia has a different shape. and this shape is what gives us the illusion of individuality
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:12 pm
why you avoiding my question?lloydnoise wrote:I can't stand your crazy conspiracy stuff Parson but that is some eloquant shit right there. bigup.parson wrote:my personal philosophy regarding the fundamental human condition is that we are all God forgetting ourselves in different ways. and that each of us has a little formula for amnesia. and everybody's amnesia has a different shape. and this shape is what gives us the illusion of individuality
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:16 pm
2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??
It's really hard to converse sensibly with someone when they believe something like this. It's bordering on delusional. Any tiny anomally becomes a clue because you want it to be. When you 'KNOW' the truth, no-one can convince you that you're wrong regardless of the lack of logic or reason in your arguement. Because everyone else is 'BLIND' (they don't believe it, like aetheists) you will turn to the people that do further validating your unfounded ideas and beliefs.
It's a cycle of impotent reasoning that never ends. Some of you guys seem really intelligent but you can't handle the fact no-one is steering the world. You need a battle that doesn't exist.
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:17 pm
You can't prove anything so either option is plausible.lloydnoise wrote:2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:21 pm
nothing can ever truly be proven, so does that mean that everything - no matter how outlandish - is plausible?Motorway to Roswell wrote:You can't prove anything so either option is plausible.lloydnoise wrote:2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:21 pm
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.james fox wrote:nothing can ever truly be proven, so does that mean that everything - no matter how outlandish - is plausible?Motorway to Roswell wrote:You can't prove anything so either option is plausible.lloydnoise wrote:2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:25 pm
lloydnoise wrote:2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??
still no answer to my question, leading me to agree with bandshell
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:33 pm
Ok, to paraphrase Bandshell; "Nothing can be proven completely so everything is as plausible as anything else".hackman wrote:lloydnoise wrote:2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??
still no answer to my question, leading me to agree with bandshell
That's a logical foobar, a null. It means nothing because it says nothing.
It is more logical for these visual anomolies to be attributed to technical issues than to poorly maintained alien disguises.
that is my answer
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:39 pm
Prove logic is valid.lloydnoise wrote:Ok, to paraphrase Bandshell; "Nothing can be proven completely so everything is as plausible as anything else".hackman wrote:lloydnoise wrote:2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??
still no answer to my question, leading me to agree with bandshell
That's a logical foobar, a null. It means nothing because it says nothing.
It is more logical for these visual anomolies to be attributed to technical issues than to poorly maintained alien disguises.
that is my answer
I can see this easily going the same way as the visualising 10 dimensions thread.
Re: Our world may be a giant hologram
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:45 pm
i can't prove that there is not a 200 foot platinum statue of noel edmonds in the marianas trench that controls my thoughts, does that make it plausible?Motorway to Roswell wrote:Yeah, that's what I'm saying.james fox wrote:nothing can ever truly be proven, so does that mean that everything - no matter how outlandish - is plausible?Motorway to Roswell wrote:You can't prove anything so either option is plausible.lloydnoise wrote:2 options;hackman wrote:oh right, no i meant that in the fact that the codec error or whatever lyyodnoise was saying, why does that only happen to specific people?
obviously you and i know why
- Lizards disguised as people working in LA gossip TV let slip their fascades and for 1 second we stare into the eyes of a race that has secretly been trying to control us for centuries
- Standard technical issue when ripping a TV feed to compressed video and then upping to youtube which recompresses again hence fucking the picture a bit
you seriously think the first option is more normal, plausible? really??