Page 5 of 10

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:03 am
by hackman
you should probably get that checked out again if you can't notice the difference in colour and that one is completely obscuring the eye while the other one isn't, as an eyelid wouldn't obscure the whole eye

Image
Image

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:12 am
by nowaysj
Putting these two together is your worst argument, I think. There are major differences in the lighting and resolution in these two images. And despite that, they look nearly identical.

In watching the og video again, it looks very much like something is popping out from underneath her top eyelid. You can see the pop and it's wave move through the flesh around her eye. Looking at that, I'd guess that it is a contact lens that popped out, and folder over on itself.

With that said, I'm pretty certain aliens have been all over this planet. I don't think this is evidence of an alien, unfortunately.

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:16 am
by hackman
nowaysj wrote:Looking at that, I'd guess that it is a contact lens that popped out, and folder over on itself.
:lol: come on, you must know that contact lenses are transparent, not solid white
i've worn them every day for nearly ten years, and nothing like that has ever happened to me

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:16 am
by lloydnoise
hackman wrote:you should probably get that checked out again if you can't notice the difference in colour and that one is completely obscuring the eye while the other one isn't, as an eyelid wouldn't obscure the whole eye

HORRIBLE PICTURES
I would chalk the difference in eye colour down to the intense studio lighting, look at her face for reference, it is really damn bright. Not sure about the eye covering but I'm sure there are simpler explainations,
how you can leap from 'weird eyelid problem' to 'definitely an alien lizard in disguise' really baffles me.

Please answer my previous questions Hackman, not trolling, just actually curious as you guys seem to know so much...

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:17 am
by hackman
YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE THAT HER EYELID HAS NOT BEEN FLIPPED OVER FOR PETES SAKE

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:19 am
by hackman
lloydnoise wrote:
hackman wrote:you should probably get that checked out again if you can't notice the difference in colour and that one is completely obscuring the eye while the other one isn't, as an eyelid wouldn't obscure the whole eye

HORRIBLE PICTURES
I would chalk the difference in eye colour down to the intense studio lighting, look at her face for reference, it is really damn bright. Not sure about the eye covering but I'm sure there are simpler explainations,
how you can leap from 'weird eyelid problem' to 'definitely an alien lizard in disguise' really baffles me.

Please answer my previous questions Hackman, not trolling, just actually curious as you guys seem to know so much...
you seem to have reptilians down, what more can i add?

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:25 am
by lloydnoise
hackman wrote:
lloydnoise wrote:
hackman wrote:you should probably get that checked out again if you can't notice the difference in colour and that one is completely obscuring the eye while the other one isn't, as an eyelid wouldn't obscure the whole eye

HORRIBLE PICTURES
I would chalk the difference in eye colour down to the intense studio lighting, look at her face for reference, it is really damn bright. Not sure about the eye covering but I'm sure there are simpler explainations,
how you can leap from 'weird eyelid problem' to 'definitely an alien lizard in disguise' really baffles me.

Please answer my previous questions Hackman, not trolling, just actually curious as you guys seem to know so much...
you seem to have reptilians down, what more can i add?
lloydnoise wrote:Please answer my previous questions Hackman
lloydnoise wrote:The point of my post before was that afaik those videos are generally considered to be 'the best evidence' of the claim, if they aren't then what is?
I am not trolling or being a dick, I really want to know and for me that requires proof.
lloydnoise wrote:Please answer my previous questions Hackman
??

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:25 am
by nowaysj
Contact lens. Lighting, video quality, very easily could make a contact lens look opaque like that.

In the two photos above, you can still see the crest of the boys eyelid, just the same as you can with the female's eyelid.

Watch that video, and just loop a small segment of it. You can see the force of the pop in her upper and lower eyelid.

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:34 am
by hackman
but the quality of the video would be fine if you were watching it off the tv, so the people who put the video on youtube would have seen it fine?
it's not the lighting, otherwise we would have seen it for more than a split second
light travels through contact lenses, doesn't make them opaque

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:42 am
by Project_B
Reptiles dont have eyelids.

As such they lack the nesscery motor skills to blink one eye at a time, even if they could possibly blink at all.

I cant even belive im entertaining this idea.

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:50 am
by hackman
lmfao hackman youve gotta be kidding me.
now you're an authority on whether reptilians have eyelids or not? lulz

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:07 am
by the acid never lies

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:09 am
by hackman
i hate to admit it, but i laughed hard at that

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:31 am
by Project_B
hackman wrote:
lmfao hackman youve gotta be kidding me.
now you're an authority on whether reptilians have eyelids or not? lulz


Okay let me rephrase. Most have eyelids, but many, such as lizards, the eyelids are fused and transparent.


But i mean of course your reptiles are super shape shifting reptiles that can fly and have strawberry bootlace farms or somthing, and eyelids.

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:44 am
by lloydnoise
lloydnoise wrote:Please answer my previous questions Hackman
lloydnoise wrote:The point of my post before was that afaik those videos are generally considered to be 'the best evidence' of the claim, if they aren't then what is?
I am not trolling or being a dick, I really want to know and for me that requires proof.
lloydnoise wrote:Please answer my previous questions Hackman
??[/quote]
lloydnoise wrote:Please answer my previous questions Hackman
Please answer my previous questions Hackman

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:22 pm
by kay
I reckon someone should go and grab these people, and perform autopsies on them. That'd put a rest to this debacle.

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:26 pm
by the acid never lies
kay wrote:I reckon someone should go and grab these people, and perform autopsies on them. That'd put a rest to this debacle.
They've obviously gained control of ever morgue on the planet. How else have they avoided detection all these years?

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:28 pm
by hackman
kay wrote:I reckon someone should go and grab these people, and perform autopsies on them. That'd put a rest to this debacle.
inter dimensional

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:37 pm
by lloydnoise
kay wrote:I reckon someone should go and grab these people, and perform autopsies on them. That'd put a rest to this debacle.
or just pull at they're faces a bit like you're calling out a fake santa

Re: Major can of worms

Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:47 pm
by HamCrescendo
hackman wrote:
kay wrote:I reckon someone should go and grab these people, and perform autopsies on them. That'd put a rest to this debacle.
inter dimensional
So another theory that cant be verified/falsified?

Great!