Dubstepforum.com

and skirted around your claims and continuing to make allegations against us

nicenice wrote:and skirted around your claims and continuing to make allegations against us

well actually its semi true we are conjoined twins we just live in different houses

crackf wrote:my first memory of seckle on snh:

i was reasonably new on this forum, and posted in that troll thread about return to space, to say how much i loved the new album

then he picked me out of everyone posting in the thread an had a big old go at me, claiming hed had enough of my shit, and whenever i questioned simply said you know what im talking about, and that i needed to get banned

no i didnt know what he was talking about, and still dont

this has nothing to do with what we're talking about in this thread

its just a conversation seckle why try skirt around it

the question is.... why did the person who wrote this write this and why did you post it????

<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSWMKiZStg4" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>

nicenice wrote:its just a conversation seckle why try skirt around it

don't turn this thread into your personal soap opera. if you can't discuss the topic then, i'm done.

thats all you done last time as well

nicenice wrote:thats all you done last time as well

again, nothing to do with the topic. why do you always have to turn your conversations into an MSN/AIM chat?

lol @ posting something that badly written though.

lol @ someone writing an article criticising conspiracy theorists for jumping to conclusions but providing no evidence to back their talk.

lol @ posting something that was a sly attack at people on this board that spoke more about yourself then it did them

seckle wrote:

crackf wrote:my first memory of seckle on snh:

i was reasonably new on this forum, and posted in that troll thread about return to space, to say how much i loved the new album

then he picked me out of everyone posting in the thread an had a big old go at me, claiming hed had enough of my shit, and whenever i questioned simply said you know what im talking about, and that i needed to get banned

no i didnt know what he was talking about, and still dont

this has nothing to do with what we're talking about in this thread

does it not? seems like what you did fits number 3 on your quoted list perfectly

ALIAS'S UNITE

TIME TO FORM

SUOPERTROOOOON

and if its still not what were talking about in this thread, what are we talking about in this thread other than generalising conspiracy theorists?

anyway, you asked me what sort of arguements i was talking about, so i do believe i was as on topic as i can be without saying

"lol conspiracy ppl r crazy"

think he's decided to seckle his jaw

nah man dem alanz is real yo

canz you see da evidence bro, look at fungus and aboriginies dems is alanz man

crackf wrote:

seckle wrote:

crackf wrote:my first memory of seckle on snh:

i was reasonably new on this forum, and posted in that troll thread about return to space, to say how much i loved the new album

then he picked me out of everyone posting in the thread an had a big old go at me, claiming hed had enough of my shit, and whenever i questioned simply said you know what im talking about, and that i needed to get banned

no i didnt know what he was talking about, and still dont

this has nothing to do with what we're talking about in this thread

does it not? seems like what you did fits number 3 on your quoted list perfectly

yet another topic turned into a thread about you and your friend nicenice . you guys need a radio show.

you just pissed

you've got a perfect face for radio though seckle

this is a fucking joke. did not think it could descend anymore.


all that happened was that Seckle posted an article he found about traits of conspiracy theorists.

now we are somehow debating seckles motives behing posting it, rather than the article itself. Furthermore why are we going on like he wrote it himself? hes obviosuly quoted it because its interesting and would serve for a good debate. as far as evidence to back it up goes, how are you meant to provide evidence that conspiracy theorists think or behave like this? dont say shut up and dont post it in the first place: simply state theres a lack of evidence to support it. and how does some random thread from ages ago bear any relevance?

just to clarify i am not having a go at anyone who is having a go at seckle, or seckle. or attacking conspiracy theorists. simply making a point about how this board seems unable to discuss things without descending into childish arguments.

everyone is saying seckle is defined in the OP. why does this matter. cant we just discuss conspiracy theorists without talking about individual people on the forum. i cant keep up with all the bullshit going on between people in each thread.

disagree with the article thats fine. i disagree with elements of it. at the same time can we keep it to debating the article rather than attacking each other. its christmas guys come on

its good they wouldn't be able to see it