...which sounds like nation-building.kay wrote:And to answer the OP's question, I would kick off a long term social engineering effort. Society has broken down over the past couple decades. Many no longer feel invested in society sufficiently to improve on it. If humanity is to move forward, we're going have to learn to live with each other better. Break down class, social, economic, gender, racial, sexual, religious, national, historical, political divides.
Economists who study the mechanics of poverty, like Paul Collier (Wars, Guns & Votes),
emphasize its importance before implementing democratic institutions like elections
e.g. in the face of internecine rivalries, Tanzanian leaders promoted a subsuming Tanzanian identity whereas neighbouring Kenyan leaders fostered tribal divisions
but imo the essential prob isn't with leaders but our individual prejudices
& our exploitation of the endeavours of generous people while dismissing them as foolishly unself-centred
politicians never seem to actively spruike the benefits to society of taking care of the less better off
or of shrinking wage inequality...
as if some banker wouldn't still be a banker if she only got $50 more pw than a garbo
and why does a banker think they need so much more money?
imo, largely because of inflated housing costs
which in turn is largely because of exploitative land ownership
and governments encouraging ever-rising house prices
as an easy (and unproductive) indicator of rising national wealth


