I talk about specific wtVirtualMark wrote: And saw/square/sine waves aren't overused?
Massive in Dubstep
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Massive in Dubstep
Re: Massive in Dubstep
uh forgive me. but aren't we a little bit constricted by what sound waves can do...VirtualMark wrote:And saw/square/sine waves aren't overused?Bustemout wrote:Agree with that. I dont use Massive, because i think that it overused. Especially Scrap Yard, Carbon and Modern Talking wt.Samuel_L_Damnson wrote:Reason is better








Re: Massive in Dubstep
They can do anything apart from go back in time, but we're working on that.RKM wrote:uh forgive me. but aren't we a little bit constricted by what sound waves can do...VirtualMark wrote:And saw/square/sine waves aren't overused?Bustemout wrote:Agree with that. I dont use Massive, because i think that it overused. Especially Scrap Yard, Carbon and Modern Talking wt.Samuel_L_Damnson wrote:Reason is better
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
Just fucking imagine that.
you could send message to your past self in sound, and they would get these voices in their head telling them stuff,but that would influence your future self. So you would be jumping in parallel universes.
you could send message to your past self in sound, and they would get these voices in their head telling them stuff,but that would influence your future self. So you would be jumping in parallel universes.
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
like myself in 2 years tiemm could tell me to pos this

2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
- ThisIsSovereign
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:59 pm
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: Massive in Dubstep
3za wrote:Just fucking imagine that.
you could send message to your past self in sound, and they would get these voices in their head telling them stuff,but that would influence your future self. So you would be jumping in parallel universes.

Re: Massive in Dubstep
That's actually much less 'mindblowing' than the actual idea of time travel.
Sound waves are relatively simple displacements of molecules in the air that reach your ear.
The real 'magic' happens when your eardrum picks up those displacements in air molecules and how your brain interprets them
#poorbantz
Sound waves are relatively simple displacements of molecules in the air that reach your ear.
The real 'magic' happens when your eardrum picks up those displacements in air molecules and how your brain interprets them
#poorbantz
-
VirtualMark
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
- Location: UK
Re: Massive in Dubstep
I was just pointing out that most things get used a lot, especially the basic waves. I wouldn't worry about Massive being overused, as you can still process a sound and end up with something unique.RKM wrote:uh forgive me. but aren't we a little bit constricted by what sound waves can do...VirtualMark wrote:And saw/square/sine waves aren't overused?Bustemout wrote:Agree with that. I dont use Massive, because i think that it overused. Especially Scrap Yard, Carbon and Modern Talking wt.Samuel_L_Damnson wrote:Reason is better
Re: Massive in Dubstep
So...I didn't want to bring it up but this ties up this troll of a thread. If you dig waaaaay back, Skrillex said that he used Ableton's operator to make some growls. There was actually a post in this forum with a pretty amazing tutorial on how to do it._Agu_ wrote:
-Your boy Skrillex uses mostly FM8 and has said in one of his interviews that the most of sounds which people think were made in Massive, he made in FM8
Somewhere in here I think....
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=210760
People get so tied up in thinking that the top notch producers are top notch because they are rich and can afford all of the cutting edge plugins and if you don't have them, you can't be good or get signed or whatever. Sorry to say....no, they are not loading up the new Awesomeitizer 2000 plugin and activating the awesomenator button...they actually know their shit and can run circles around everyone with stock tools like operator.
Here we go. This makes me want to get operator.
Re: Massive in Dubstep
Sorry for late reply, haven't been in dsf for a while. But yeah, I knew he uses Operator, he just didn't give it that much weight in one of the other interviews I read, it confused me a bit.Banesy wrote:So...I didn't want to bring it up but this ties up this troll of a thread. If you dig waaaaay back, Skrillex said that he used Ableton's operator to make some growls. There was actually a post in this forum with a pretty amazing tutorial on how to do it._Agu_ wrote:
-Your boy Skrillex uses mostly FM8 and has said in one of his interviews that the most of sounds which people think were made in Massive, he made in FM8
Somewhere in here I think....
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=210760
People get so tied up in thinking that the top notch producers are top notch because they are rich and can afford all of the cutting edge plugins and if you don't have them, you can't be good or get signed or whatever. Sorry to say....no, they are not loading up the new Awesomeitizer 2000 plugin and activating the awesomenator button...they actually know their shit and can run circles around everyone with stock tools like operator.
Here we go. This makes me want to get operator.
Way I see it, thing that matters when choosing plugins is the "sound" of it, not actually how many different parameters there is to be automated and how many oscillators you can stack on the top of each other.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests