Page 5 of 6

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:36 pm
by __________
its a shame nike and adidas are so popular. pretty sure they make all their shit in sweatshops and pay the kiddies there 0.0001p an hour

yes you are very stylish, but think about where your £80 for those shoes is really going.

i don't understand people that collect trainers either. some people have hundreds of pairs of nikes. mad shit. you can't put a shoe on a platter and listen to it, so why bother collecting them? :lol:

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:38 pm
by deamonds
Thomas wrote:Image

when they wanna look dappa.
yes indeed, scooped a pair of these the other day, in white with the massive croc on the side

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:41 pm
by thomas
£10 Bag wrote:its a shame nike and adidas are so popular. pretty sure they make all their shit in sweatshops and pay the kiddies there 0.0001p an hour
Not true, maybe back in the 70's or 80's. Its all above board, theres regulators and even the governments in china etc are on it. Its the fake factorys which are the ones to watch.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:45 pm
by kidlogic
£10 Bag wrote:its a shame nike and adidas are so popular. pretty sure they make all their shit in sweatshops and pay the kiddies there 0.0001p an hour

yes you are very stylish, but think about where your £80 for those shoes is really going.

i don't understand people that collect trainers either. some people have hundreds of pairs of nikes. mad shit. you can't put a shoe on a platter and listen to it, so why bother collecting them? :lol:
But some would say the same to you about vinyl - you cant wear a record, and I already have it on CD... :lol:

Plus, have you seen how much Nike Dunks go for after they get 'rare'? Hundreds to thousands of dollars a pair. I know dudes that will buy three pair of the rare editions - One to wear, one to sell and one to save. Instant gratification, instant profit and instant investment.

I feel you on the popularity of Nike and Adidas, although I dont think (but Im not sure) that Adidas is a sweatshop company, isnt most of their stuff made in Europe? I havent bought Nikes in probably 16 years since I was in high school and started to learn about them.

Other than Adidas I try to buy smaller skate shoes companies or companies like Simple that are more green. I buy Addidas cause they usually hold up really well, my last pair are more than a year old and dont look more than 3 months old and are comfortable as hell, on top of looking dope.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:50 pm
by thomas
Na, adidas is mainly in Asia aswell.
But to be honest, about 90% of the brands people buy, primark and H&M included is made in the same way as nike and Adidas.

If you wanna get picky. Buying cheap clothes s just as bad, if not worse. Its only fueling the demand for people in Asia to work for less or for factorys still in Europe to be relocated.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:12 pm
by badger
Thomas wrote:If you wanna get picky. Buying cheap clothes s just as bad, if not worse.
remember hearing a statistic that 10,000 people a year are killed by a chemical commonly used in treating cotton. lovely thought there

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:23 pm
by Jubz
Here's a question:

Is it better to be judged by people such as £10 bag for choosing to wear nikes and adidas or by a lady for what shoes you're wearing?

This fred ist funneee.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:26 pm
by badger
i'm judging you for the fact you care about which of them is judging you

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:28 pm
by Jubz
Badger-san, I can only guess your power of reasoning faltered to bring you to that conclusion. My simply posing a question does not indicate my caring one way or t'other.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:37 pm
by __________
Jubscarz wrote:Here's a question:

Is it better to be judged by people such as £10 bag for choosing to wear nikes and adidas or by a lady for what shoes you're wearing?

This fred ist funneee.
its better to just not give a flying fuck if you ask me

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:45 pm
by Jubz
Exactamundo.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:45 pm
by forensix (mcr)
Jubscarz wrote:Exactamundo.
that isn't a real word.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:48 pm
by Jubz
forensix (mcr) wrote:
Jubscarz wrote:Exactamundo.
that isn't a real word.
Image

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:49 pm
by forensix (mcr)
Jubscarz wrote:
forensix (mcr) wrote:
Jubscarz wrote:Exactamundo.
that isn't a real word.
Image
I hope you die. Soon.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:51 pm
by __________
forensix (mcr) wrote:
Jubscarz wrote:Exactamundo.
that isn't a real word.
neither is forensix or prik.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:52 pm
by forensix (mcr)
£10 Bag wrote:
forensix (mcr) wrote:
Jubscarz wrote:Exactamundo.
that isn't a real word.
neither is forensix or prik.
o rly

I hope you die slowly too.

Prik

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:53 pm
by __________
i knew you were going to say that before you even said it.

you are so predictable





































prik

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:57 pm
by forensix (mcr)
£10 Bag wrote:i knew you were going to say that before you even said it.

you are so predictable





































prik
and that isn't???



shuddup

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:14 pm
by badger
prik is actually going to included in the next edition of the oxford english dictionary. forensix, however, is clearly not a word. unless it's a word spelt by a retard