Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:02 am
yes more wolf dick pls
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Page 44 of 49
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:52 am
more drake/boi 1da
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:02 pm
no not drake
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:01 pm
smoking venues tbh.
the game changed when we couldn't smoke inside the club/rave anymore
the game changed when we couldn't smoke inside the club/rave anymore
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:03 pm
303s anyone?
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:05 pm
you don't think we've had our fill at this point? rolland can take a fucking break for a couple of decades 
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 7:46 pm
it has but still deffo more 303, just less of the other shit
imo 303s and drums made of things hitting each other would be the way to go
and push it up to maybe 135
imo 303s and drums made of things hitting each other would be the way to go
and push it up to maybe 135
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:49 pm
Wasn't specifically referring to French Fries but yeah his stuff and other stuff like that. Although I'm sure I'm guilty of owning a few tunes like thatPerej wrote:basically french fries thenrorz9992 wrote:blanket term I use to describe the lazy UK house / 'bass music' sound that is popular atm. Typically features heavy use of the 808 kick and cowbell and looped vocal snippetsskimpi wrote:what is 808 house?rorz9992 wrote:More 140 jungle
Less Burial rip-offs and 808 house
Also, more people experimenting with hardware. Expensive but I think it could allow for some more creativity. Software is great but so many producers rely on the same presets and VSTs
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:03 pm
LESS FLYLO RIPOFFS OMFG!1111. I've checked out heaps of music lately, man. And why are there so many FlyLo clones? Put those drums back on the grid, they don't sound 'loose', they sound bad and kill the energy. Going 'off the grid' is done to allow more freedom in creating groove and placing drumhits. If it's just done for the sake of it, sell all your music gear and put Ableton in the recycle bin. Write a shitty music blog instead, ugh.
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:35 pm
Yeah, I love French Fries:SCope13 wrote:French Fries is fun as fuck doe
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:42 pm
yeh is can be fun
there are just a few h808ters from the house sub forum that pick on him for being derivative club music which is teh piont ofg derviuatiove club msuic
there are just a few h808ters from the house sub forum that pick on him for being derivative club music which is teh piont ofg derviuatiove club msuic
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:24 pm
yeah i dont really think he's trying to be anything more than that, he does what he does pretty well
i think he's a bit of a tnuc though for that blatant cactus rip off
i think he's a bit of a tnuc though for that blatant cactus rip off
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:20 am
people who do and create whatever the fuck they want/feel, would be awesome
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:31 am
MORE OF DEM FRENCH FRIES YOU GET ME
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:32 am
tbh. you just sound butt hurt for some reason.Genevieve wrote:LESS FLYLO RIPOFFS OMFG!1111. I've checked out heaps of music lately, man. And why are there so many FlyLo clones? Put those drums back on the grid, they don't sound 'loose', they sound bad and kill the energy. Going 'off the grid' is done to allow more freedom in creating groove and placing drumhits. If it's just done for the sake of it, sell all your music gear and put Ableton in the recycle bin. Write a shitty music blog instead, ugh.
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:33 am
bring 2004/nelly alt rnb back
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:39 am
Nah, FlyLo clones are really badSinestepper wrote:tbh. you just sound butt hurt for some reason.Genevieve wrote:LESS FLYLO RIPOFFS OMFG!1111. I've checked out heaps of music lately, man. And why are there so many FlyLo clones? Put those drums back on the grid, they don't sound 'loose', they sound bad and kill the energy. Going 'off the grid' is done to allow more freedom in creating groove and placing drumhits. If it's just done for the sake of it, sell all your music gear and put Ableton in the recycle bin. Write a shitty music blog instead, ugh.
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:05 am
yea those flylo ripoffs were lame but that was like 2009-11. now it's samiyam rip offs that are definitely prevalent in the " soundcloud beatscene"
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:21 am
Its annoying cos thats basically what im working on lol
Re: What does electronic music need more/less of in 2013?
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:29 am
If you have off beat drums cuz they's sound good, cool.
If you're doing it for the sake of it and turn it into a 'LUK HOW LOOSE MAH DRUMS R' jerk-off, then yeah bad.
Sometimes a certain original aesthetic becomes popular and then copycats isolate that original aesthetic, turn it into the point of the music ITSELF and then I think "cool man, you have some purty loose drums here, but where's the tune?'. This also happened post-Burial where suddenly EVERYONE wanted to have a 'Burial shuffle'. Burial's drums sound good cuz they're good, they just happen to be shuffly. 'Outshuffling' Burial won't make your drums sound better, just shuffly. And I've heard some drumprogramming where the whole impact was lost because of the ubershuffle. It sounded so slow
Cloning isn't bad, ripping-off or trying to incorporate an aesthetic into your choons is all good. But when it turns into fetishizing that aesthetic, it's not fun to listen to me anymore. It's like listening some super technical guitar shredder or whiteboy fusion jazz.
If you're doing it for the sake of it and turn it into a 'LUK HOW LOOSE MAH DRUMS R' jerk-off, then yeah bad.
Sometimes a certain original aesthetic becomes popular and then copycats isolate that original aesthetic, turn it into the point of the music ITSELF and then I think "cool man, you have some purty loose drums here, but where's the tune?'. This also happened post-Burial where suddenly EVERYONE wanted to have a 'Burial shuffle'. Burial's drums sound good cuz they're good, they just happen to be shuffly. 'Outshuffling' Burial won't make your drums sound better, just shuffly. And I've heard some drumprogramming where the whole impact was lost because of the ubershuffle. It sounded so slow
Cloning isn't bad, ripping-off or trying to incorporate an aesthetic into your choons is all good. But when it turns into fetishizing that aesthetic, it's not fun to listen to me anymore. It's like listening some super technical guitar shredder or whiteboy fusion jazz.