atmospherics...

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
major zero
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:42 am

atmospherics...

Post by major zero » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:17 pm

been listening to a lot of reso stuff recently and have been trying to replicate the amazing atmospheric sounds he has it a lot of his tunes, particularly in the breakdowns. a good example would be Otacon (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ochlM5qmSY). also the breakdown of When I Look At You is an another idea of what i want to achieve..

as far as i can tell its a combination of lots of verb, delay, and creative use of pads/string samples, am i close?? having trouble producing anywhere near the standard of what he comes out with though..
I make musics innit: http://soundcloud.com/dotmotif

User avatar
lowpass
Posts: 2688
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Re: atmospherics...

Post by lowpass » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:22 pm

lots of different parts = interest

lots of different parts = cluttered mix

use of careful eq can result in a more coherent mix,

try it

gnome
Posts: 4415
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: atmospherics...

Post by gnome » Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:43 pm

lowpass wrote:lots of different parts = interest

lots of different parts = cluttered mix

use of careful eq can result in a more coherent mix,

try it
My constant problem

nitz
Posts: 3105
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:28 pm

Re: atmospherics...

Post by nitz » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:50 pm

lowpass wrote:lots of different parts = interest

lots of different parts = cluttered mix

use of careful eq can result in a more coherent mix,

try it
"lots of different parts = cluttered mix"

Not if you Eq them right! it can get quite hard tho..
A brand new song!

Soundcloud

chronicrecords
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: England

Re: atmospherics...

Post by chronicrecords » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:48 am

maybe absynth?
Skratch wrote:I have always been quite musical in my life, switching from drums to trumpet to guitar to now dub step.

User avatar
crytek
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: H-Town

Re: atmospherics...

Post by crytek » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am

nitz wrote:
lowpass wrote:lots of different parts = interest

lots of different parts = cluttered mix

use of careful eq can result in a more coherent mix,

try it
"lots of different parts = cluttered mix"

Not if you Eq them right! it can get quite hard tho..
Didn't he just say that?
See Bold.
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.

Time is running...
|

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: atmospherics...

Post by deadly_habit » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:55 am

listen to ambient or atmospheric lps or tunes non dubstep or close to and break it down
way i look at it is to be human and evolve it human like with emotion to fit the tune. kinda like natural drums

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: atmospherics...

Post by deadly_habit » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:57 am

oh since i havent recommended any
vangelis bladerunner score, brian eno and company, lustmord etc

User avatar
future producer
Posts: 552
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:48 pm

Re: atmospherics...

Post by future producer » Mon Oct 19, 2009 5:47 pm

The easiest way to do lush floating pads is to layer choir and strings together with a fuck load of reverb,
Reach for the lasers, save as fuck.

User avatar
-dubson-
Posts: 4356
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:09 pm

Re: atmospherics...

Post by -dubson- » Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:25 pm

I like to pitch down vocals or background recordings, reverse them, glitch them up a bit. Then add loads of reverb. Some nice background atmospheres can be made like that.

User avatar
reso
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: ENFORR

Re: atmospherics...

Post by reso » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:53 am

Don't forget to pan the crap out of everything. Mess around with Phase reversal too.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: atmospherics...

Post by serox » Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:27 am

major zero wrote: a good example would be Otacon (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ochlM5qmSY).
Not heard much of him before (not really into this style of Dubstep). What is he using to make sounds like this? has so much going and it does not sound muddy at all. I struggle to get that much down without running into problems even with EQ/filters on everything!

It sounds like he has loads of different bassline sounds going on at the same time. Has he just split the bassline into different layers? would love to see what his DAW looks like with one of his finished tunes.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
reso
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: ENFORR

Re: atmospherics...

Post by reso » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:16 am

Image
Image

This is the Otacon arrange page, dunno how much help it'll be, just shows how many track i'm using. Tooooo many!

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: atmospherics...

Post by serox » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:23 am

reso wrote:Image
Image

This is the Otacon arrange page, dunno how much help it'll be, just shows how many track i'm using. Tooooo many!
Thanks for that. I did not know you were a regular on here.

You have as much down as I thought you may. That is logic I think, right? whats the audio on the left, are they all vsts or a mixture of VSTs and samples on something like an audio channel? Is thyere any difference to the ones below that have names or are they just unnamed channels?
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
reso
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: ENFORR

Re: atmospherics...

Post by reso » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:31 am

All the Blue blocks are audio, all the green blocks are VST's. Ignore the channel names, i'm not a big fan of naming channels unless it's something i really need to remember where/what it is. VST tracks automatically name themselves in logic.
I bounce down lots of stuff to audio and add more effects/edit etc, but keep the VST channel there incase i need to tweak it later.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: atmospherics...

Post by serox » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:33 am

reso wrote:All the Blue blocks are audio, all the green blocks are VST's. Ignore the channel names, i'm not a big fan of naming channels unless it's something i really need to remember where/what it is. VST tracks automatically name themselves in logic.
I bounce down lots of stuff to audio and add more effects/edit etc, but keep the VST channel there incase i need to tweak it later.
Thanks. Is it possible to see all ur automation like that play list screenshot please?
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
reso
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: ENFORR

Re: atmospherics...

Post by reso » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:40 am

tbh generally when i automate something i'll bounce it down and re-insert as audio, or if it's a bassline/midrange sound i'll just duplicate the channel and change the settings rather than automate. In this final arrange there really isn't that much automation to be seen as i've already rendered the heavily automated parts.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: atmospherics...

Post by serox » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:44 am

reso wrote:tbh generally when i automate something i'll bounce it down and re-insert as audio, or if it's a bassline/midrange sound i'll just duplicate the channel and change the settings rather than automate. In this final arrange there really isn't that much automation to be seen as i've already rendered the heavily automated parts.
Sounds like such an alien way to work to me but I guess it works:)

Maybe if I bounce things down and insert as audio I will spend less time trying to tweak things and then get more done in the end.

How many different basslines of audio do you have for that tune someone mention in the first post, Otacon.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
reso
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: ENFORR

Re: atmospherics...

Post by reso » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:51 am

the pics i posted are the Otacon arrange.
I think there's about 16 or 17 different bass parts. Some are still VST, some i rendered to audio to tweak a little bit more.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: atmospherics...

Post by serox » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:59 am

reso wrote:the pics i posted are the Otacon arrange.
I think there's about 16 or 17 different bass parts. Some are still VST, some i rendered to audio to tweak a little bit more.
Wow, that many eh? I guess this is quite normal for conventional Dubstep.

Thanks for the info.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests