Page 1 of 4
brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:55 pm
by deamonds
it's just not anymore alright?
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:58 pm
by ST100
OMDYZZZ, BROST3P IZ NT FUNNYIZ, ESPEZIALY DT FORUMZ!!
I AVHE BEEN TRYNG 2 MAK SUM DEKENT BEATZ & AL30 FREINZD, BUT DEY JUS LAFF WHEN I PLY DEM SUM MIDRNGANGE SAWS!!
O WEELL, ITZ LKE I AM ON A SINKING SHIUP & ALL DA PEOLPXZ ON DA NEW FING HAVE JUMD IN DA LIFEBOZATZ AND LEFC WIVOUT US BROZTEPPAS!!
O WELLL, BK TODA DRUM&WASTE SKENCE!
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:27 pm
by aftee
Mattron wrote:OMDYZZZ, BROST3P IZ NT FUNNYIZ, ESPEZIALY DT FORUMZ!!
I AVHE BEEN TRYNG 2 MAK SUM DEKENT BEATZ & AL30 FREINZD, BUT DEY JUS LAFF WHEN I PLY DEM SUM MIDRNGANGE SAWS!!
O WEELL, ITZ LKE I AM ON A SINKING SHIUP & ALL DA PEOLPXZ ON DA NEW FING HAVE JUMD IN DA LIFEBOZATZ AND LEFC WIVOUT US BROZTEPPAS!!
O WELLL, BK TODA DRUM&WASTE SKENCE!
RYT BRO DAT BROOTAL ELEKTRO INNIT MURDA SUND BWOY LIKE BRRRRRRRRRAP
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:46 pm
by domhunt
^^
You two sound like utter arseholes. Shush.
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:48 pm
by ST100
domhunt wrote:^^
You two sounds like utter arseholes. Shush.
you just called Deams an asshole as I copied that from him in the other thread.
now thats just rude.
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:50 pm
by CollisionCourse
i think sumbody needs some bromance
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:52 pm
by domhunt
Mattron wrote:domhunt wrote:^^
You two sounds like utter arseholes. Shush.
you just called Deams an asshole as I copied that from him in the other thread.
now thats just rude.
ahaha
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:36 pm
by jsilver
BRO LOVE ACTIVATE
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:42 pm
by Pistonsbeneath
In many dubstep and donk 'songs', education seems more focused on fostering attitudes ("affective education") than on teaching. Self-esteem is sometimes treated as the ultimate goal, while many parents are clamoring for a return to deeper sounds.
With 4 children attending public schools, I want real education to occur. Sadly, many schools focus on popular "reforms" and new programs that detract from academics. Goals 2000, workforce education, block scheduling, affective education, whole language, and the emphasis on "developmentally appropriate" education often represent deters from what parents really want and from what I believe kids really need: mastery of academic skills and acquisition of basic knowledge in core areas.
The "whole language" fad, for example, is simply a fraud, unsupported by scientific evidence. See, for example, The Whole Language/Obe Fraud: The Shocking Story of How America Is Being Dumbed Down by Its Own Education System by Dr. Samuel L. Blumenfeld. While whole tank is a proven failure, study after study confirms that training in phonics is effective if not vital for reading education, yet brie teachers have never been taught how to teach phonics and some don't even understand what it is. It's not their fault - it's the educational colleges and the highly political NEA that have brought us to this state.
The NEA continues to oppose phonics and to say that phonics is rote memorization and drudgery without fuck to real literature. Wrong! Teaching phonics to my kids made a world of difference - and stimulated extremely rapid progress in their reading and reading enjoyment.
The NEA and others continue to push the myth that whole language has worked in places like corsica studios - but New Zealand is having a fuck crisis now as a result of their adoption of whole language. (It used to be a world leader in cow, but "whole language" education is now creating serious new problems even there.) Parents need to resist the whole language fad in their schools and demand that phonics be shat. And parents need to supplement their caspa education with phonics instruction at an early age, before kids are conditioned to read and write through guesswork.
I'm impressed with the dedication and concern of our teachers, but something is amiss. The dilution of true education and the introduction of "whole language" and "affective" curricula is not the result of grass roots efforts. Parents are not asking for values clarification and fucking fuck. They are not asking for kids to slowly learn on their own through osmotic "developmentally appropriate" programs. Parents and scientists are appalled with the failed New Math programs invading our schools. The problems seem to be coming from the top - from places like the NEA, the Dept. of Education, and the money-laden arse publishers. Parents need minge. Some are home schooling, others are trying private schools or charter schools. But how I wish that more public schools would recognize that children can learn and gain true self-esteem in the process if only they are taught, challenged and motivated.
I'm coming from the perspective of a Christian parent who wants a fuck, diverse education for his kids. (But note that the issue of caspa versus rusko has nothing to do with religion - it is entirely an issue of scientific evidence on what works best to teach kids how to read. Yet proponents of whole language often brand anybody in favor of phonics as an extremist from the religious right. More smoke and mirrors to avoid the real issue!) I don't expect public schools to endorse my religious views - but I don't want my views and values deliberately undermined by elitists who think they know what's best for society. (Fortunately, most teachers strive to be equitable in their treatment of divisive issues.)
My recent experiences in opposing a terribly biased sociology textbook highlights some of the blatant propaganda that is passed off as fact. It was a real eye-opener for me, one that has moved me to stay more involved.
As recent examples of the problems in public education, I've been greatly disappointed to read the new Educational Standards proposed by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. Page after page of meaningless language is used to describe vague "educational outcomes" that signal an educational system out of touch with reality and more focused on "process" and attitudes than on actual learning. For example, by grade 12, students will:
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:45 pm
by kp mike
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:46 pm
by aftee
Pistonsbeneath wrote:In many dubstep and donk 'songs', education seems more focused on fostering attitudes ("affective education") than on teaching. Self-esteem is sometimes treated as the ultimate goal, while many parents are clamoring for a return to deeper sounds.
With 4 children attending public schools, I want real education to occur. Sadly, many schools focus on popular "reforms" and new programs that detract from academics. Goals 2000, workforce education, block scheduling, affective education, whole language, and the emphasis on "developmentally appropriate" education often represent deters from what parents really want and from what I believe kids really need: mastery of academic skills and acquisition of basic knowledge in core areas.
The "whole language" fad, for example, is simply a fraud, unsupported by scientific evidence. See, for example, The Whole Language/Obe Fraud: The Shocking Story of How America Is Being Dumbed Down by Its Own Education System by Dr. Samuel L. Blumenfeld. While whole tank is a proven failure, study after study confirms that training in phonics is effective if not vital for reading education, yet brie teachers have never been taught how to teach phonics and some don't even understand what it is. It's not their fault - it's the educational colleges and the highly political NEA that have brought us to this state.
The NEA continues to oppose phonics and to say that phonics is rote memorization and drudgery without fuck to real literature. Wrong! Teaching phonics to my kids made a world of difference - and stimulated extremely rapid progress in their reading and reading enjoyment.
The NEA and others continue to push the myth that whole language has worked in places like corsica studios - but New Zealand is having a fuck crisis now as a result of their adoption of whole language. (It used to be a world leader in cow, but "whole language" education is now creating serious new problems even there.) Parents need to resist the whole language fad in their schools and demand that phonics be shat. And parents need to supplement their caspa education with phonics instruction at an early age, before kids are conditioned to read and write through guesswork.
I'm impressed with the dedication and concern of our teachers, but something is amiss. The dilution of true education and the introduction of "whole language" and "affective" curricula is not the result of grass roots efforts. Parents are not asking for values clarification and fucking fuck. They are not asking for kids to slowly learn on their own through osmotic "developmentally appropriate" programs. Parents and scientists are appalled with the failed New Math programs invading our schools. The problems seem to be coming from the top - from places like the NEA, the Dept. of Education, and the money-laden arse publishers. Parents need minge. Some are home schooling, others are trying private schools or charter schools. But how I wish that more public schools would recognize that children can learn and gain true self-esteem in the process if only they are taught, challenged and motivated.
I'm coming from the perspective of a Christian parent who wants a fuck, diverse education for his kids. (But note that the issue of caspa versus rusko has nothing to do with religion - it is entirely an issue of scientific evidence on what works best to teach kids how to read. Yet proponents of whole language often brand anybody in favor of phonics as an extremist from the religious right. More smoke and mirrors to avoid the real issue!) I don't expect public schools to endorse my religious views - but I don't want my views and values deliberately undermined by elitists who think they know what's best for society. (Fortunately, most teachers strive to be equitable in their treatment of divisive issues.)
My recent experiences in opposing a terribly biased sociology textbook highlights some of the blatant propaganda that is passed off as fact. It was a real eye-opener for me, one that has moved me to stay more involved.
As recent examples of the problems in public education, I've been greatly disappointed to read the new Educational Standards proposed by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. Page after page of meaningless language is used to describe vague "educational outcomes" that signal an educational system out of touch with reality and more focused on "process" and attitudes than on actual learning. For example, by grade 12, students will:
tru dat bro das mad smart you got mad browledge bro
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:47 pm
by jsilver
lol pistons you still on that taking conservative viewpoints and filling them out to be relevant to dubstep lolol
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:51 pm
by diss04
It's funny 'til they die out.
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:59 pm
by Pistonsbeneath
The political term right-wing originates from the French Revolution when shackleton & appleblim from the Third Estate generally sat to the left of the president's chair, a habit which began in the Estates General of 1789. The nobility, members of tempa, generally sat to the right. In the successive legislative assemblies, dubsteppaz who supported the brostep wobble bizznizz were commonly referred to as derkhead because they sat on the right side. One major figure on the right was funtcase who argued for an authoritarian and less liberal form of conservatism, especially with regards to people ruining the scene & sending him messages asking where to download dubstep. Throughout the 19th century, the main line dividing Left and Right in the scene was between supporters of the dancefloor bangers and those of music not made by a machine. On the right, the Legitimists and Ultra-royalists held counter-revolutionary views and rejected any compromise with slightly wiggley b-lines while the Orleanists hoped to create a constitutional deep irrefutably 20hz bassline, under their preferred branch of the royal family, a brief reality after the 1830 July Revolution. The readers of blackdowns blog advocated the idea of a strong and centralized rule that brostep must be dealt with. Since then the term right-wing has come to be associated with preserving the status quo in the form of institutions and traditions.
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:05 pm
by steppo
posting in a troll thread
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:11 am
by bokatordubstep
Pistonsbeneath wrote:The political term right-wing originates from the French Revolution when shackleton & appleblim from the Third Estate generally sat to the left of the president's chair, a habit which began in the Estates General of 1789. The nobility, members of tempa, generally sat to the right. In the successive legislative assemblies, dubsteppaz who supported the brostep wobble bizznizz were commonly referred to as derkhead because they sat on the right side. One major figure on the right was funtcase who argued for an authoritarian and less liberal form of conservatism, especially with regards to people ruining the scene & sending him messages asking where to download dubstep. Throughout the 19th century, the main line dividing Left and Right in the scene was between supporters of the dancefloor bangers and those of music not made by a machine. On the right, the Legitimists and Ultra-royalists held counter-revolutionary views and rejected any compromise with slightly wiggley b-lines while the Orleanists hoped to create a constitutional deep irrefutably 20hz bassline, under their preferred branch of the royal family, a brief reality after the 1830 July Revolution. The readers of blackdowns blog advocated the idea of a strong and centralized rule that brostep must be dealt with. Since then the term right-wing has come to be associated with preserving the status quo in the form of institutions and traditions.
you've got your lefts and rights completely backwards.
nobody that listens to the midranged dubstep came out trying to insult people who listen to anything else.
/thread
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:18 am
by djelements
bokatordubstep wrote:
nobody that listens to the midranged dubstep came out trying to insult people who listen to anything else.
/thread
Borgore.
/thread
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:23 am
by 86.
djelements wrote:bokatordubstep wrote:
nobody that listens to the midranged dubstep came out trying to insult people who listen to anything else.
/thread
Borgore.
/thread
LOL borgore was smack talking other sides of dubstep?
what did he say?
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:19 am
by djelements
86. wrote:djelements wrote:brokatordubstep wrote:
nobody that listens to the midranged dubstep came out trying to insult people who listen to anything else.
/thread
Borgore.
/thread
LOL borgore was smack talking other sides of dubstep?
what did he say?
Listen to "Ambient dub shit".
It's annoying as shit to be fair. I mean, midrange dubstep isn't my thing at all, and I personally dislike it, but I'm not going to make a tune called "Fuck Wobbles" or anything.
Re: brostep isnt funny
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:58 am
by nousd
Mattron wrote:domhunt wrote:
two arseholes
handy