Page 1 of 2

Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:55 pm
by nasty biznes
Breaking the Banksy:The first interview with the world's most elusive artist

Image

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive ... rtist.html

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:14 pm
by firky
Am not even going to read it but I do have this bookmarked to pull out at whim for Banksy threads :D

Supposing ... Subversive genius Banksy is actually rubbish

o Charlie Brooker
o The Guardian, Friday 22 September 2006
o Article history

Here's a mystery for you. Renegade urban graffiti artist Banksy is clearly a guffhead of massive proportions, yet he's often feted as a genius straddling the bleeding edge of now. Why? Because his work looks dazzlingly clever to idiots. And apparently that'll do.

Banksy first became famous for his stencilled subversions of pop-culture images; one showed John Travolta and Samuel L Jackson in a famous pose from Pulp Fiction, with their guns replaced by bananas. What did it mean? Something to do with the glamourisation of violence, yeah? Never mind. It looked cool. Most importantly, it was accompanied by the name "BANKSY" in huge letters, so everyone knew who'd done it. This, of course, is the real message behind all of Banksy's work, despite any appearances to the contrary.

Take his political stuff. One featured that Vietnamese girl who had her clothes napalmed off. Ho-hum, a familiar image, you think. I'll just be on my way to my 9 to 5 desk job, mindless drone that I am. Then, with an astonished lurch, you notice sly, subversive genius Banksy has stencilled Mickey Mouse and Ronald McDonald either side of her.

Wham! The message hits you like a lead bus: America ... um ... war ... er ... Disney ... and stuff. Wow. In an instant, your worldview changes forever. Your eyes are opened. Staggering away, mind blown, you flick v-signs at a Burger King on the way home. Nice one Banksy! You've shown us the truth, yeah?

As if that wasn't irritating enough, Banksy's vague, pseudo-subversive preaching is often accompanied by a downright embarrassing hardnut swagger. His website is full of advice to other would-be graffiti bores, like: "be aware that going on a mission drunk out of your head will result in some truly spectacular artwork and at least one night in the cells". Woah, man - the cells!

He goes on to explain that "real villains" think graffiti is pointless - not because he wants you to agree with them, but because he wants you to know he's mates with a few tough-guy criminal types. Coz Banksy's an anarchalist what don't respect no law, innit?

One of his most imbecilic daubings depicts a monkey wearing a sandwich board with "lying to the police is never wrong" written on it. So presumably Ian Huntley was right then, Banksy? You absolute thundering backside.

Recently, our hero's made headlines by sneaking a dummy dressed in Guantánamo rags into Disneyland (once again fearlessly exposing Mickey Mouse's disgusting war criminal past), and defacing several hundred copies of Paris Hilton's new album (I haven't heard her CD, but I'm willing to bet it's far superior to Blur's godawful Think Tank, a useless bumdrizzle of an album, whose artwork was done by Banksy - presumably he spray-painted it on a brick and hurled it through EMI's window, yeah?).

Right now you can see some of Banksy's life-altering acts of genius for yourself at his LA exhibition Barely Legal (yeah? Yeah!), including a live elephant painted to blend in with some gaudy wallpaper. This apparently represents "the big issues some people choose to ignore" - ie pretty much anything from global poverty to Aids. But not, presumably, the fat-arsed, berk-pleasing rubbishness of Banksy. We're all keeping schtum about that one.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:42 pm
by ahier
i may be biased, but that 'interview' is a shockingly bad piece of journalism.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:52 am
by Project_B
reading now, should be intersting.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:12 am
by helix
ahier wrote:i may be biased, but that 'interview' is a shockingly bad piece of journalism.
I may have to agree.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:48 am
by lloydnoise
firky wrote:Am not even going to read it but I do have this bookmarked to pull out at whim for Banksy threads :D
Godbless Brooker. Banksy is witty and great at juxtaposition. That's about it :)

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:53 am
by Shae
I would love to meet whoever wrote that article firky... sounds like a grade A bellend

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:26 am
by sonar
Image

does that say fuck cdjs?

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:26 pm
by curse
I refuse to stop liking Banksy's stuff just because he's very popular

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:55 pm
by magma
curse wrote:I refuse to stop liking Banksy's stuff just because he's very popular
This, but he does get a bit too much exposure.

I was a bit bummed out when the One Nation Under CCTV got scrubbed, used to walk past it most days. :(

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:38 pm
by adamjames
CCTreeV
For a guy who is trying to establish himself (or has been unwillingly established as) a poignant, social commentating graffiti artist, he couldn't have half picked a more piss poor name for that statue.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:59 pm
by WatchYourStep
firky wrote:Am not even going to read it but I do have this bookmarked to pull out at whim for Banksy threads :D

Supposing ... Subversive genius Banksy is actually rubbish

o Charlie Brooker
o The Guardian, Friday 22 September 2006
o Article history

Here's a mystery for you. Renegade urban graffiti artist Banksy is clearly a guffhead of massive proportions, yet he's often feted as a genius straddling the bleeding edge of now. Why? Because his work looks dazzlingly clever to idiots. And apparently that'll do.

Banksy first became famous for his stencilled subversions of pop-culture images; one showed John Travolta and Samuel L Jackson in a famous pose from Pulp Fiction, with their guns replaced by bananas. What did it mean? Something to do with the glamourisation of violence, yeah? Never mind. It looked cool. Most importantly, it was accompanied by the name "BANKSY" in huge letters, so everyone knew who'd done it. This, of course, is the real message behind all of Banksy's work, despite any appearances to the contrary.

Take his political stuff. One featured that Vietnamese girl who had her clothes napalmed off. Ho-hum, a familiar image, you think. I'll just be on my way to my 9 to 5 desk job, mindless drone that I am. Then, with an astonished lurch, you notice sly, subversive genius Banksy has stencilled Mickey Mouse and Ronald McDonald either side of her.

Wham! The message hits you like a lead bus: America ... um ... war ... er ... Disney ... and stuff. Wow. In an instant, your worldview changes forever. Your eyes are opened. Staggering away, mind blown, you flick v-signs at a Burger King on the way home. Nice one Banksy! You've shown us the truth, yeah?

As if that wasn't irritating enough, Banksy's vague, pseudo-subversive preaching is often accompanied by a downright embarrassing hardnut swagger. His website is full of advice to other would-be graffiti bores, like: "be aware that going on a mission drunk out of your head will result in some truly spectacular artwork and at least one night in the cells". Woah, man - the cells!

He goes on to explain that "real villains" think graffiti is pointless - not because he wants you to agree with them, but because he wants you to know he's mates with a few tough-guy criminal types. Coz Banksy's an anarchalist what don't respect no law, innit?

One of his most imbecilic daubings depicts a monkey wearing a sandwich board with "lying to the police is never wrong" written on it. So presumably Ian Huntley was right then, Banksy? You absolute thundering backside.

Recently, our hero's made headlines by sneaking a dummy dressed in Guantánamo rags into Disneyland (once again fearlessly exposing Mickey Mouse's disgusting war criminal past), and defacing several hundred copies of Paris Hilton's new album (I haven't heard her CD, but I'm willing to bet it's far superior to Blur's godawful Think Tank, a useless bumdrizzle of an album, whose artwork was done by Banksy - presumably he spray-painted it on a brick and hurled it through EMI's window, yeah?).

Right now you can see some of Banksy's life-altering acts of genius for yourself at his LA exhibition Barely Legal (yeah? Yeah!), including a live elephant painted to blend in with some gaudy wallpaper. This apparently represents "the big issues some people choose to ignore" - ie pretty much anything from global poverty to Aids. But not, presumably, the fat-arsed, berk-pleasing rubbishness of Banksy. We're all keeping schtum about that one.
Interessing

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:10 pm
by Lichee
i've always admired his anonymity and graffiti until the day he decided to start making money and then he lost the appeal. Your opening comment is too true, it seems that what his graffiti is saying or the supposed hidden messages are so blatant that anyone with some intelligence can understand it. He's good, but he's not a genius. I just wish he hadn't started selling himself out. It's a shame, but i'll always have Burial to cling on to and inspire me.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:19 pm
by upstateface
Not too big on banksy :?

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:24 pm
by rbnc
Shae wrote:I would love to meet whoever wrote that article firky... sounds like a grade A bellend
I disagree, Charlie Brooker is one of the most insightful, original thinkers in the media world.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:27 pm
by -dubson-
curse wrote:I refuse to stop liking Banksy's stuff just because he's very popular
Well said.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:51 pm
by helix
rbnc wrote:
Shae wrote:I would love to meet whoever wrote that article firky... sounds like a grade A bellend
I disagree, Charlie Brooker is one of the most insightful, original thinkers in the media world.
We should deify him.

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:57 pm
by firky
I don't mind banksy; don't think he is all that (and you acn't deny his work is quite repetitive). I like Basquiat's graffiti far more, different strokes for different folks init. What annoys me banksy is not really him but those who think he's some kind of subversive warrior! Fair play if you like him, nothing wrong in that, just odn't put him on a pedestal.

Drunk :?

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:17 pm
by z.u.bee
firky wrote:Am not even going to read it but I do have this bookmarked to pull out at whim for Banksy threads :D

Supposing ... Subversive genius Banksy is actually rubbish

o Charlie Brooker
o The Guardian, Friday 22 September 2006
o Article history

Here's a mystery for you. Renegade urban graffiti artist Banksy is clearly a guffhead of massive proportions, yet he's often feted as a genius straddling the bleeding edge of now. Why? Because his work looks dazzlingly clever to idiots. And apparently that'll do.

Banksy first became famous for his stencilled subversions of pop-culture images; one showed John Travolta and Samuel L Jackson in a famous pose from Pulp Fiction, with their guns replaced by bananas. What did it mean? Something to do with the glamourisation of violence, yeah? Never mind. It looked cool. Most importantly, it was accompanied by the name "BANKSY" in huge letters, so everyone knew who'd done it. This, of course, is the real message behind all of Banksy's work, despite any appearances to the contrary.

Take his political stuff. One featured that Vietnamese girl who had her clothes napalmed off. Ho-hum, a familiar image, you think. I'll just be on my way to my 9 to 5 desk job, mindless drone that I am. Then, with an astonished lurch, you notice sly, subversive genius Banksy has stencilled Mickey Mouse and Ronald McDonald either side of her.

Wham! The message hits you like a lead bus: America ... um ... war ... er ... Disney ... and stuff. Wow. In an instant, your worldview changes forever. Your eyes are opened. Staggering away, mind blown, you flick v-signs at a Burger King on the way home. Nice one Banksy! You've shown us the truth, yeah?

As if that wasn't irritating enough, Banksy's vague, pseudo-subversive preaching is often accompanied by a downright embarrassing hardnut swagger. His website is full of advice to other would-be graffiti bores, like: "be aware that going on a mission drunk out of your head will result in some truly spectacular artwork and at least one night in the cells". Woah, man - the cells!

He goes on to explain that "real villains" think graffiti is pointless - not because he wants you to agree with them, but because he wants you to know he's mates with a few tough-guy criminal types. Coz Banksy's an anarchalist what don't respect no law, innit?

One of his most imbecilic daubings depicts a monkey wearing a sandwich board with "lying to the police is never wrong" written on it. So presumably Ian Huntley was right then, Banksy? You absolute thundering backside.

Recently, our hero's made headlines by sneaking a dummy dressed in Guantánamo rags into Disneyland (once again fearlessly exposing Mickey Mouse's disgusting war criminal past), and defacing several hundred copies of Paris Hilton's new album (I haven't heard her CD, but I'm willing to bet it's far superior to Blur's godawful Think Tank, a useless bumdrizzle of an album, whose artwork was done by Banksy - presumably he spray-painted it on a brick and hurled it through EMI's window, yeah?).

Right now you can see some of Banksy's life-altering acts of genius for yourself at his LA exhibition Barely Legal (yeah? Yeah!), including a live elephant painted to blend in with some gaudy wallpaper. This apparently represents "the big issues some people choose to ignore" - ie pretty much anything from global poverty to Aids. But not, presumably, the fat-arsed, berk-pleasing rubbishness of Banksy. We're all keeping schtum about that one.


is it me or does charlie brooker seem to be an expert on everything????

Re: Breaking the Banksy:The first interview

Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:22 pm
by adamjames
z.u.bee wrote: is it me or does charlie brooker seem to be an expert on everything????
Charlie Brooker is the one.