apple itunes sells 58 tunes a second.

seckle · Post by **seckle** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:26 pm

58 tunes...$58 dollars a second. 5 million songs sold in a day.
anyone whose been in the music biz needs to have a read. from a business perspective alone, it's unbelievable.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/live ... s-keynote/

steve jobs wrote:9:21am - "There was an article recently stating that iTunes sales have slowed dramatically; I don't know what data they're looking at..." (Shows chart with insane upward slope.) "We are selling over 5 million songs a day now. That's 58 songs every second... the last time we talked we were the fifth largest music retailer in the US. We have now passed Amazon; we sell more music than Amazon and we are now #4.

parson · Post by **parson** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:39 pm

holy crap

crash fistfight · Post by **crash fistfight** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:28 pm

Its funny that apple nearly when bust and now they are one of the biggest companies in the world. The business world is fucking crazy.

marsyas · Post by **marsyas** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:23 pm

who cares

subframe · Post by **subframe** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:27 pm

Marsyas wrote:who cares

Obviously digital music formats and the downloading thereof are the future. Apple is the most important force in that market. So pretty much anyone who has or plans to buy, listen to, or play out a digital file any time soon should at least pay some attention imo.

marsyas · Post by **marsyas** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:30 pm

if u plan on playing out with some wank apple file, thats barely even cd quality...by all means pay attention.stupid (lazy) people use itunes imo.

not to say its not a cash cow, it sure is.

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:51 pm

Marsyas wrote:if u plan on playing out with some wank apple file, thats barely even cd quality...by all means pay attention.stupid (lazy) people use itunes imo.

not to say its not a cash cow, it sure is.

people put convenience before quality, always. It's lazy, but I sure like not having to drive to the nearest music store to buy something I've just heard on an internet radio station. A million others agree.

little boh peep · Post by **little boh peep** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:31 am

Marsyas wrote:if u plan on playing out with some wank apple file, thats barely even cd quality...by all means pay attention.stupid (lazy) people use itunes imo.

Not everyone is a DJ though, or even an audio purist.

Also,

two oh one wrote:people put convenience before quality, always. It's lazy, but I sure like not having to drive to the nearest music store to buy something I've just heard on an internet radio station.

Agreed. There's absolutely stupid money in digital distribution.

crash fistfight · Post by **crash fistfight** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:07 am

Little Boh Peep wrote:Not everyone is a DJ though, or even an audio purist.

Its dead true. For home use low sample rates are fine, if your paying for a track and there is audible deterioration within the sound its only then you have a problem. Plus you are buying a lossy format. I mean you can buy flac tracks but they aren't readily available for every song in the world.

ozeb · Post by **ozeb** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:20 am

Marsyas wrote:who cares

People who own Apple stock.

marsyas · Post by **marsyas** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:24 am

two oh one wrote:
Marsyas wrote:if u plan on playing out with some wank apple file, thats barely even cd quality...by all means pay attention.stupid (lazy) people use itunes imo.

not to say its not a cash cow, it sure is.
people put convenience before quality, always. It's lazy, but I sure like not having to drive to the nearest music store to buy something I've just heard on an internet radio station. A million others agree.

couldn't disagree more with this.
once again impatience and convenience are priorities.

all these replies just reiterate exactly what i said, lets pay a dollar for 1 track that u dont own, that doesnt work outside of apple products. that sounds weak...itunes is far from convenient.

i may aswell do all my food shopping at 7-11 cause i am already going there for gas once a week right?

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:49 am

Marsyas wrote:
two oh one wrote:
Marsyas wrote:if u plan on playing out with some wank apple file, thats barely even cd quality...by all means pay attention.stupid (lazy) people use itunes imo.

not to say its not a cash cow, it sure is.
people put convenience before quality, always. It's lazy, but I sure like not having to drive to the nearest music store to buy something I've just heard on an internet radio station. A million others agree.
couldn't disagree more with this.
once again impatience and convenience are priorities.

all these replies just reiterate exactly what i said, lets pay a dollar for 1 track that u dont own, that doesnt work outside of apple products. that sounds weak...itunes is far from convenient.

i may aswell do all my food shopping at 7-11 cause i am already going there for gas once a week right?

Well, it works for me as a music customer and as somebody with music up on there for sale. I don't care about tracks not playing nice with other hardware or whatever. I'm quite happy with my computers, my iPods and iTunes and I personally find it massively convenient.

I think having the ability to upload it to unlimited iPod devices and on 5 computers at once is more than I'll ever need. It doesn't feel limiting and I don't know why people feel the need to put their music on more than 5 machines anyway. Plus, there's always the Hymm project if you *MUST* set the music free.

As far as shopping at 7-11 for food, I bet there are people out there that wouldn't eat were it not for 7-11. Or drivethrus.

selector.dub.u · Post by **selector.dub.u** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:56 am

Good for Apple.

I am all for digital distro and convenience.

My main qualm with i-tunes is that the file format they use adds a layer of complexity when transferring media between mediums.

kion · Post by **kion** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:46 pm

I'm sure Marsyas works for Microsoft.

metalboxproducts · Post by **metalboxproducts** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:40 am

KION wrote:I'm sure Marsyas works for Microsoft.

I'm sure Seckle works for Apple.

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:17 am

metalboxproducts wrote:
KION wrote:I'm sure Marsyas works for Microsoft.
I'm sure Seckle works for Apple.

I'm sure Metalbox doesn't work

Wonder how this compares with the amount of illegal downloads though

seckle · Post by **seckle** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:20 am

metalboxproducts wrote:
KION wrote:I'm sure Marsyas works for Microsoft.
I'm sure Seckle works for Apple.

thats pure bait. you have to work harder than that.lol

shonky · Post by **shonky** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:47 am

seckle wrote:
metalboxproducts wrote:
KION wrote:I'm sure Marsyas works for Microsoft.
I'm sure Seckle works for Apple.
thats pure bait. you have to work harder than that.lol

Mind you, that's exactly the sort of thing a covert Apple promoter might say

apple itunes sells 58 tunes a second.

apple itunes sells 58 tunes a second.

Who is online