Vinyl VS CDJ's

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
Akira
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:06 pm

Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by Akira » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:07 am

i was just wondering what are the differences if there are any, and also has anyone noticed how more of the sort of midrange djs and producers tend to use cdjs, whereas the deeper subby stuff is generally mixed on wax, is there a particular reason for this? personally i have and always will be a vinyl man was just wondering about any other peoples thoughts on this?

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by deadly_habit » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:16 am

Image

User avatar
pkay
Posts: 6708
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:27 am
Location: Stop Six (USA)
Contact:

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by pkay » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:16 am

In comparison, the mid range stuff is newer and less established in the scene and overall has less vinyl being put out... lot more net labels or labels that are building themselves up currently and have a lot of unreleased audio being shared amongst label mates.

More MP3 tunes = more tunes on cdj's. Paying $30 to have a dub cut is just hard to rationalize when a CD costs 12 cents.

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by wolf89 » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:33 am

I like vinyl when playing. Just prefer the feel of control I have over a record.

Also I'm an obsessive record collector in general. I love having the actual physical copies. Feel like a bit of a knob buying just a digital file.

dre
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: detroit, mi

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by dre » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:41 am

having a physical copy is great. no offense producers, but i hate buying c.d.s and have even less interest in buying the digital tune.
i understand why there's such little vinyl, especially with dubstep, being produced but for anyone out there that runs a label; press that shit! it can always be recycled into new records and the quality of the work shows through more on a record. everything from the sleeve to the insert can be coordinated making that 12" far more interesting than a digi tune.

lucky strike
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:18 pm

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by lucky strike » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:44 am

I have never bought an MP3 and haven't bought a CD for years and years.

I have a collection nearing 600 vinyls in total and I love listening to them (don't even mix as I only have one deck at the moment).

Therefore I am completely uninterested in digital media as long as vinyl is still around.

User avatar
signus
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Leeds Sitay

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by signus » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:51 am

Both have their pros and cons but for me at the end of the day it all comes down to money. I can't afford to cut dubplates therefore I play cds

User avatar
wooda916
Posts: 1951
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:39 pm
Location: Birmingham / Leeds
Contact:

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by wooda916 » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:52 am

pkay wrote:Paying $30 to have a dub cut is just hard to rationalize when a CD costs 12 cents.
quality controll

User avatar
Luke Yeah?
Posts: 1297
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Birmingham, UK

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by Luke Yeah? » Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:56 am

The argument between the two formats has been done to death but you raise a good point about how certain styles in the sound tend to favour more towards one than the other.

kingthing
Posts: 466
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 12:36 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by kingthing » Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:18 am

serato all the way :w:
**SUB.FM EVERY OTHER FRIDAY 4-6PM**

http://soundcloud.com/kingthing
http://www.nightaudio.co.uk - http://soundcloud.com/nightaudio

Bookings/remixes - olly --at-- scoobydoob.co.uk

User avatar
clairvoyeur
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:56 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by clairvoyeur » Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:51 am

yes, serato is the best of both worlds since you can switch seemlessly between real vinyl and control vinyl

User avatar
Phyalow
Posts: 710
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:56 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by Phyalow » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:03 am

kingthing wrote:serato all the way :w:
+1, love it.

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by fractal » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:05 am

lucky strike wrote:I have never bought an MP3 and haven't bought a CD for years and years.

I have a collection nearing 600 vinyls in total and I love listening to them (don't even mix as I only have one deck at the moment).

Therefore I am completely uninterested in digital media as long as vinyl is still around.


this is me, aside from the one deck part :)


it's whateve's... sometimes i feel like it should be CDP ( cd player) instead of CDJ, but i guess that doesn't sound as cool, lol
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
brent
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:51 pm

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by brent » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:12 am

so many of these, but i'll post my opinion in this one. mp3s are cheaper, don't get scratched, and don't wear out. quite a few digital DJs probably don't even buy the music. if i was ever at a gig and saw that, i'd probably knock your laptop off by "accident." i've heard that it's easier to mix digitally. i only know vinyl, and i'm still learning. i'm sad that a few releases i want are digital only and i don't have cash for a 3rd channel CDJ. it's also ridiculous to buy a white label promo thinking that's it, only to find a full artwork release a few weeks later. so, you pay double if you want the art. sometimes you'll be paying almost $10 for just one song, too. then there's the whole limited release greed for ebay/discogs. i want SBTRKT "Timeless" on vinyl and 2 sellers want $40+ for it. well, i have the mp3 rip so if i ever had a CDJ...the one time i'd say it was ok. no offense, SBTRKT. ;X

User avatar
grimesceneinvestigation
Posts: 776
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:23 pm

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by grimesceneinvestigation » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:13 am

deadly habit wrote:Image
i allmost choked on my breakfast

User avatar
EBR
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by EBR » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:44 am

pkay wrote:In comparison, the mid range stuff is newer and less established in the scene and overall has less vinyl being put out... lot more net labels or labels that are building themselves up currently and have a lot of unreleased audio being shared amongst label mates.

More MP3 tunes = more tunes on cdj's. Paying $30 to have a dub cut is just hard to rationalize when a CD costs 12 cents.
ITs not hard to rationalize at all. A stack of dubplates is much more exiting than a thumb drive with some mp3s. After Djing in clubs for almost 2 decades I Can say i'd much rather have a box full of dubplates than some new CDJs.

To each their own. Its about the quality of the end product for me. My mixes have got to be good because life is f*cking short. I don't have time to listen to a bunch of crap. The mixes are the end product. For me, each ingredient has to be as high a quality as I can muster. Then there is no question as to the quality of the outcome !

No question. I know I can take My record box full of wax and drop them ALL in front of 30,000 people if i had to. I would not be so confident with a couple flash drives and a laptop. But whatever... do what you are satisfied with. Its up to you.

User avatar
EBR
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by EBR » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:46 am

kingthing wrote:serato all the way :w:
Serato makes it real easy doesnt it ? :lol:

Image

User avatar
pkay
Posts: 6708
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:27 am
Location: Stop Six (USA)
Contact:

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by pkay » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:51 am

wooda916 wrote:
pkay wrote:Paying $30 to have a dub cut is just hard to rationalize when a CD costs 12 cents.
quality controll
Hate to break it to everyone but you don't get any cool points for cutting dubs in 2010. If you're putting out vinyl and are getting a test press then good on you... outside that if you're on a label and your labelmates/artists you're friends with whose sound matches your style or you simply want to support, CDJ's are a godsend.

At WMC last week, even with the heavy hitters, CDJ's outnumbered dubplates by about 20 to 1. It's simply more efficient and allows for much faster turn around.

But that's beside the point... that's now what the original poster was asking. They were asking why midrange has more CDJ useage... the answer is because midrange is rather new and still establishing itself and in comparison, has far less vinyl releases currently

User avatar
pkay
Posts: 6708
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:27 am
Location: Stop Six (USA)
Contact:

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by pkay » Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:59 am

EBR wrote:
pkay wrote:In comparison, the mid range stuff is newer and less established in the scene and overall has less vinyl being put out... lot more net labels or labels that are building themselves up currently and have a lot of unreleased audio being shared amongst label mates.

More MP3 tunes = more tunes on cdj's. Paying $30 to have a dub cut is just hard to rationalize when a CD costs 12 cents.
ITs not hard to rationalize at all. A stack of dubplates is much more exiting than a thumb drive with some mp3s. After Djing in clubs for almost 2 decades I Can say i'd much rather have a box full of dubplates than some new CDJs.

To each their own. Its about the quality of the end product for me. My mixes have got to be good because life is f*cking short. I don't have time to listen to a bunch of crap. The mixes are the end product. For me, each ingredient has to be as high a quality as I can muster. Then there is no question as to the quality of the outcome !

No question. I know I can take My record box full of wax and drop them ALL in front of 30,000 people if i had to. I would not be so confident with a couple flash drives and a laptop. But whatever... do what you are satisfied with. Its up to you.
Are you serious dude? Dubplates are more exciting?

So my label sorted me with KOAN Sound- New Beginning. That tune will be more exciting on a dubplate than it would be on a CDJ or Serato? Dude you've got issues if you think the medium determines anything.

Considering how quickly the sound degrades and the limited number of really really quality cutting houses still around, it's a wash on sound quality of dubplates vs cdjs.

I've DJ'd 15 years, more parties than I can count, and like I said if you think you're cooler because you dropped the cash to cut a dub then you are a whack dj. You can't buy your way to being a good DJ and anyone who thinks you're cooler because your dubplate has 2 holes in it versus a dj whose vinyl has 1 hole in it doesn't know much about djing

Even when it comes to big name DJ's, the only ones who are really cutting dubs in heavy heavy quantity are ones who work or have a close mate who works with access to a cut. It's 2010...the whole mysticism and elitism of dubplates has long since passed.
Last edited by pkay on Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
WatchYourStep
Posts: 2012
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Earth, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster

Re: Vinyl VS CDJ's

Post by WatchYourStep » Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:15 am

deadly habit wrote:Image
Emo vocals cut themselves

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests