Page 1 of 1
Headphones recommendation
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:29 pm
by WeedKeepa
Okay i'm after some headphones and i've done a little research and heard numerous recommendations. The Sony Xb series look sick for bass, but you'd look like a spanner walking round with them on. Look like giant donuts strapped to your head. But yeah i've been looking at the Sony MDR-V700's in the Dj range not sure whether these are any good, especially with the focus being on bass and low frequencies. And with sony, i may only be paying for the brand name. Also heard the Sennheiser HD range are pretty good. Any recommendations? Thanks

Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:31 pm
by DZA
Sennheiser HD 25-1 II

Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:39 pm
by WeedKeepa
DZA wrote:Sennheiser HD 25-1 II

Yeah nice one, been looking at the 25's

Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:53 pm
by collige
Senn HD600s
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:10 pm
by JFK
everyone get over to the DSF channel on Ustream. Phrex is on the decks!!
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:13 pm
by AxeD
Bump for the sake of proper sound.
So kinda have the same question as Weedkeepa, headphones with proper bass (no over-kill)?
I know Ultrasone, Grado and such are pretty good but I ain't spending 140 quid on a pair of headphones.
O and it's for listening to dubstep and dnb not for any production work.
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:30 pm
by shortinos
ATH-M50
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:42 pm
by phrex
JFK wrote:everyone get over to the DSF channel on Ustream. Phrex is on the decks!!
hahaha just seen this. you're ace jfk

Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:43 pm
by ItsK
shortinos wrote:ATH-M50

Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:24 am
by deadly_habit
shure srh750dj
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:11 am
by rbnc
shortinos wrote:ATH-M50
Word word word word.
They sound better than my B&W speakers, no exaggeration.
The cheaper ATH-m30 and ATH-m40 both excellent too at about £30 and £50 respectively, so you could save yourself some cash and pick up either of these, which are better sounding than the HD25s or you can pick up the ATH-M50s for about £100, and blow your mind!
The obvious advantage of the Senheisers is they are smaller and lighter, I recently acquired some Senheiser HD25s for taking out and about, but I've permenently lent them to my girlfriend, to me personally they don't sound amazing, they're not bad but I'd rather take out the M50s even though they're hench!
http://www.dubstepforum.com/post1568922 ... a#p1568922
rbnc wrote:
If you're producing, get some monitor headphones like Audio Technica M series. They do plenty of cheaper options like the ATH-M40s which used to cost £130 back in the day but you can get them for about £50 now. You will love them.
They have a frequency response of 5hz - 28,000 Hz (realistically probably about 30Hz) . Plenty of bass, anything below 90Hz is subbass (that number varies on who you ask mind). They will be 100x bassier, fuller and than the Skull Candy poo!
I used to own the ATH-M20s until I sat on them and broke them with my massive arse. Now I have the ATM-M50s. Both great value.
Review
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1996_ar ... thm40.html
Audio Technica have produced a very accurate-sounding, enclosed headphone capable of more than enough sound level for serious monitoring or mixing work. Because these phones are enclosed, not only do you get a very solid bass end, you also get very little sound leakage -- an important consideration when recording or overdubbing vocals or acoustic instruments. In the project studio, the ATH-M40s should meet all headphone needs both sides of the glass; my only remaining reservation is the lack of a plug-in lead. Even then, I guess it would be easy enough to fit a small in-line stereo plug and socket into the lead, close to the headphones, if you felt very strongly about it. In a nutshell, though, these are some of the better-sounding enclosed phones on the market.
Enjoy
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:08 pm
by Subside
DZA wrote:Sennheiser HD 25-1 II

Best headphones IMO.
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:32 pm
by WeedKeepa
Thanks for the replies guys, torn between the 25's ant the M50's now
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:56 pm
by rbnc
Either way you'll be happy, the HD25s aren't terrible, and if you never hear the M50s, you'll be happy with the HD25s.
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/73819
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/75004
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:19 pm
by WeedKeepa
Thanks man, i'm looking tempted by the m50's

However if you look back to my original post i was at first interested by the sony MDR-700's.
In comparing both the M50's and the MDR-700's the stats are as follows:
MDR-V700
Driver Diameter: 50 mm
Frequency Response: 5 - 30,000 Hz
Sensitivity: 107 dB
Impedance: 24 ohms
ATH-M50
Driver Diameter: 45 mm
Frequency Response: 15 - 28,000 Hz
Sensitivity: 99 dB
Impedance: 38 ohms
In comparison the M50's have a larger impedance value where as the V700's sensitivity, FR, driver diameter are greater. What does this mean?

Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:18 pm
by rbnc
To be honest, you can't actually tell how good headphones or speakers are by the stats, for example, Skull Candy, who make the worst headphones of all time, claim their headphones have a dynamic range of 5hz to 50k or something silly, but they sound utterly terrible.
But for the record:
Frequency response is the theoretical range of the headphones, 5Hz is really low, anything below 90hz is sub bass, anything below 20hz you can't hear but you can feel.
Driver Diameter is the physical size of the speaker driver.
Sensitivity, lower is better, but not too low or else they'll be too quiet, more sensitivity allows more dynamic range and better sound quality. That's why you'll find in the cheaper ATH M-30s have a slightly higher dB.
Impedance is something that is more relevant to big speakers, I wouldn't worry about it too much.
If you're truly undecided Your best bet is to try and listen to both pairs in the shop and see which you like most failing that, read reviews from good sources, not from consumers and not gadget mags, try proper audiophile journals like sound on sound.
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:07 pm
by little square dot
Sennheiser HD 25-1 II
There is no other headphone. (in a reasonable price range)
Trust me, I've been through them all and nothing comes close. Etymotic Research in-ear buds are good too, but cancel sound quite effectively, so good luck djing with them. Go Sennheiser.
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:54 pm
by rbnc
little square dot wrote:Sennheiser HD 25-1 II
There is no other headphone. (in a reasonable price range)
So you think you think they're better than the B&W P5s? :|
Re: Headphones recommendation
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:59 pm
by Mad_EP
To the OP...
If you are considering Sony Headphones, I would go for the MDR-V6's. I know lots of people here prefer the Sennheisers, but personally I use the V6's.