hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click
HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
b-lam
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:23 am
Post
by b-lam » Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:29 pm
ok so a very techy question.
i'm just gonna explain what i understand about this, please someone tell me if i'm wrong...
so each frequency is a certain pitch, and different sounds are made by adding harmonics, which are basically different pitches added onto the main one... so theoretically if i got an incredibly effecient bandpass on a sound i could isolate the various waves it is made up of, and theoretically you could make any sound from a combination of sine waves and volume envelopes...
am i making any sense at all? it all seems a bit simple now i think i've got the hang of it

-
pompende
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:57 am
- Location: 38104
-
Contact:
Post
by pompende » Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:06 pm
uhhhhhhh...i am pretty sure although i am not good with the syntax here.
to me tho it sounds like all you need now is Kontakt2 !
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials

-
intoccabile
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 9:28 pm
- Location: Shizuoka, Japan
Post
by intoccabile » Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:14 pm
It's exactly as you said, B-LAM !
-
misk
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:40 am
- Location: East Coast Soon!
-
Contact:
Post
by misk » Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:23 pm
thats pretty much true man. when you get down to it, i suppose that the most realistic form of synthesis would be additive synthesis, with an unlimited number of sine wave oscillators. though, in reality, the ability to recreate any sound imaginable with sinewaves alone is near impossible i would think.
or atlease rather futile.
but yes, frequency = pitch

-
b-lam
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:23 am
Post
by b-lam » Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:25 pm
Misk wrote:thats pretty much true man. when you get down to it, i suppose that the most realistic form of synthesis would be additive synthesis, with an unlimited number of sine wave oscillators. though, in reality, the ability to recreate any sound imaginable with sinewaves alone is near impossible i would think.
or atlease rather futile.
but yes, frequency = pitch

yeh i wasnt hopin to become some sort of synthesis genius it was just curiousity.
cheers for clearin that up

-
crash fistfight
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:30 am
- Location: Manchester/Bradford/Leeds
Post
by crash fistfight » Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:15 am
Its amazing what you can do wth synthesis techniques. I did a synthesis module last year where we touched on Formant synthesis, building the harmonics up until you get a vowel sound. Its dead freaky. You are right though you could come up with virtually any sound possible but it wouldn't sound excatly like it as you have to take timbre into effect too.
Every wave has differing harmonics a sine wave is made up of even harmonics while a square wave is made up of odd harmonics and its these that add together to make a sound. From what I remeber from my studies that is a sort of a stripped down version.
Pitch doesn't have anything to do with the harmonics, this creates the specific sound of the wave. Its the cycles per second of a wave that determines the pitch which is measured in Hz.
.
"We are now up against live, hostile targets. So, if Little Red Riding Hood should show up with a bazooka and a bad attitude, I expect you to chin the bitch."
-
pompende
- Posts: 2897
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:57 am
- Location: 38104
-
Contact:
Post
by pompende » Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:00 am
Misk wrote: the ability to recreate any sound imaginable with sinewaves alone is near impossible i would think.
or atlease rather futile.
tell that to fourier.
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials

-
nospin
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:34 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
Post
by nospin » Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:41 am
Crash Fistfight wrote:IYou are right though you could come up with virtually any sound possible but it wouldn't sound excatly like it as you have to take timbre into effect too. .
the 'timbre' is a result of the harmonics. an A on bass guitar sounds different than and A on a saxophone, because of the upper harmonics created by the shape and materials of the instrument.
theoretically, if you could analyze a sound made, all of the frequencies, their amplitude, and when they occur, then you could recreate that exact sound.... isnt that sampling? or any digital audio recording.?
i dont really hope to make a synth sound like a trumpet though... not really my goal...
-
b-lam
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:23 am
Post
by b-lam » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:21 am
Crash Fistfight wrote:
Every wave has differing harmonics a sine wave is made up of even harmonics while a square wave is made up of odd harmonics and its these that add together to make a sound. From what I remeber from my studies that is a sort of a stripped down version.
Pitch doesn't have anything to do with the harmonics, this creates the specific sound of the wave. Its the cycles per second of a wave that determines the pitch which is measured in Hz.
.
ok is this definatly right? because on here i've also read that by lowpassing a square wave you can get a near sine wave... a sub bass technique, i've tried it and it does sound similar to a sine... which would mean that what makes it a square wave (the harmonics) are the bits in the higher frequencies i.e. higher pitches....?...
-
nospin
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:34 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
Post
by nospin » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:11 am
B-LAM wrote:ok is this definatly right? because on here i've also read that by lowpassing a square wave you can get a near sine wave... a sub bass technique, i've tried it and it does sound similar to a sine... which would mean that what makes it a square wave (the harmonics) are the bits in the higher frequencies i.e. higher pitches....?...
from what i understood, a pure sine wave didnt have harmonics
a sine wave occurs at one frequency. when you add higher frequencies on top of it (at lower volumes) they wont be heard as a "pitch" but will effect the shape and sound of the wave. the loudest (highest amplitude) frequency, will usually be the lowest, and usually be the note we hear it as. if you filter out all the harmonics, then you are back to one frequency, one sine wave.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_series
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_synthesis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonics
-
b-lam
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:23 am
Post
by b-lam » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:30 am
NoSpin wrote:B-LAM wrote:ok is this definatly right? because on here i've also read that by lowpassing a square wave you can get a near sine wave... a sub bass technique, i've tried it and it does sound similar to a sine... which would mean that what makes it a square wave (the harmonics) are the bits in the higher frequencies i.e. higher pitches....?...
from what i understood, a pure sine wave didnt have harmonics
a sine wave occurs at one frequency. when you add higher frequencies on top of it (at lower volumes) they wont be heard as a "pitch" but will effect the shape and sound of the wave. the loudest (highest amplitude) frequency, will usually be the lowest, and usually be the note we hear it as. if you filter out all the harmonics, then you are back to one frequency, one sine wave.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_series
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_synthesis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonics
ah gotcha, i thought fistfight was saying harmonics didnt have a pitch, which he wasnt, he was just sayin they dont necessarily audibly affect the pitch. good links, i understand it better now
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests