Dubstepforum.com

Plenty of sample packs offer royalty free diologue pretty much every tune out at the mo contains movie diologue which the law is very shady on this subject,up to 5 seconds is not actually classed as braking the law....
The comment Grass ,cant you take a joke hence LOL at the end of the comment....
The machines comes FREE with CROSSING OVER LP
cannot be bought as a single again not actually braking the law

http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/do ... ease/12372

ANY PUBLICITY IS GOOD PUBLICITY
over 800 people now know about FULL ENGLISH RECORDINGS
that didnt last week so thanks for that!!!!

any comment made that offended dont take it to heart.....

its better than the first thread lol, but i have to agree with the peeps saying u shud change the website, like someone said, even if its juts got contact details up, its better than that background, diiirty eggs

garffi3 wrote:Plenty of sample packs offer royalty free diologue pretty much every tune out at the mo contains movie diologue which the law is very shady on this subject,up to 5 seconds is not actually classed as braking the law....

I've studied intellectual property law and I'm fairly sure that's not the case. It's more a question of whether the copyright holder of the source material is aware of the infringement, and whether they decide to pursue if they are. For a generic dubstep tune with 4sec of Danny Dyer going "YOU CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANT" before the drop, I doubt they'd be interested.

garffi3 wrote:
ANY PUBLICITY IS GOOD PUBLICITY

Not strictly true. Behaving aggressively online isn't a good luck, irrespective of your motives.

garffi3 wrote:over 800 people now know about FULL ENGLISH RECORDINGS
that didnt last week so thanks for that!!!!

That's 800+ views of the topic, not 800+ unique page impressions. A fair chunk of those would be from the original poster (i.e. you) and the people you were having discussions with.

For a generic dubstep tune with 4sec diologue , proving my point the machines contains less than 4 secs lol

garffi3 wrote:For a generic dubstep tune with 4sec diologue , proving my point the machines contains less than 4 secs lol

Still unlicensed use of copyright material though.

garffi3 wrote:For a generic dubstep tune with 4sec diologue , proving my point the machines contains less than 4 secs lol

To be honest Id assume a decent label would make sure that every sample is royalty free before release??? Ive heard of people being asked to take samples out in case the owner ever sued.

Theres no law on free downloads ,besides it rarly goes to court they just take 90% of the sales
& its not a 3 min acapella of someone big lol....

That last thread was so funny I put it in the Golden ears hilarity thread.

garffi3 wrote:Theres no law on free downloads

Where's the free download link to this tune then?

benjaminC wrote:

garffi3 wrote:For a generic dubstep tune with 4sec diologue , proving my point the machines contains less than 4 secs lol

To be honest Id assume a decent label would make sure that every sample is royalty free before release??? Ive heard of people being asked to take samples out in case the owner ever sued.

We cover it by using standard release forms, a little form stating the artist is not aware of any sampled or copyrighted material. Then any damages the label would bare the brunt of fall squarely on the producer. Realistically, depending on the sample source, most people won't give two shits because you won't make enough money off the release to go through the effort and expense of court to only get the royalties from a release that sold 700 units.

And to be perfectly honest, we've (and every other label I know of) has put out music with uncleared samples, you just got to go in eyes open and be prepared to back up your artists and take the flak should it kick off (like it has done for us).

garffi3 wrote:Theres no law on free downloads

This and that 5 second thing is a complete balls. Any usage of someone else's work is supposed to go through the appropriate measures. You should read up on sampling laws and such, it's not THAT boring (tho a lot of it IS that boring). There are exemptions from having to declare sampling, such as an indistinguishable sample or for the use of satire, but you'd be hard pushed to use the latter in defence of some free giveaway mp3.

garffi3 wrote:ANY PUBLICITY IS GOOD PUBLICITY

Interesting. I've gone from never having heard of you to knowing to stay well clear of anything associated with you.

Top notch PR skills bro.

Round 2
Fight

Fair play i did wonder how labels would protect themselves against less honest artists.
I still stand by what I said in t'other thread though bad publicity is bad publicity if your serious Id change the name website and your attitude. Theres some seriously fucking good unsigned people on here that youve alienated. Id look at similar small labels and see how theyve gone about it.

Music speaks for itself attitudes got nothing to do with it ,for example Goldie said on live radio music @ 180bpm is rubbish so everyone in the world that makes beats @ 180 wont buy anything form metalheadz is that what your saying...you bunch of jokers!!!!

my tunes get spun by DJs regardless of what you lads think!!!!

paravrais wrote:

garffi3 wrote:ANY PUBLICITY IS GOOD PUBLICITY

Interesting. I've gone from never having heard of you to knowing to stay well clear of anything associated with you.

Top notch PR skills bro.

garffi3 wrote:Music speaks for itself attitudes got nothing to do with it ,for example Goldie said on live radio music @ 180bpm is rubbish so everyone in the world that makes beats @ 180 wont buy anything form metalheadz is that what your saying...you bunch of jokers!!!!

my tunes get spun by DJs regardless of what you lads think!!!!

Think you misunderstood what I meant by attitude check the locked thread
As for your tunes well done I didnt say anything about them just gave my input on what Id do after such PR fuck up.
But then what do I know ??? Im just a potential customer......

garffi3 wrote: my tunes get spun by DJs regardless of what you lads think!!!!

Anyone we've heard of?

Also;

wub wrote:

garffi3 wrote:Theres no law on free downloads

Where's the free download link to this tune then?

haha this thread aint gonna go down any better than the first one

dj nation wrote:haha this thread aint gonna go down any better than the first one

http://www.hark.com/clips/dqcwzrbfpl-thirsty

He's a cheeky scamp.

Goldie said that on Radio 1 though right?
Do you see the difference here...
GOLDIE said this on RADIO 1, AFTER people had bought thousands and thousands of his records.
Not while trying to get artists for his label on a forum and driving his core market away.

Why do you even want other artists though?
You're label is clearly just a way to get your tunes released because you don't have the social skills to approach a proper label.

Kthnxbaisum1lockthisnonsensepls.