Dubstepforum.com

Any way to get higher than 64kbps on the live stream?

dowload it and save it as a wav to increase the quality IMHO

incnic wrote:dowload it and save it as a wav to increase the quality IMHO

best way i think, got audacity? try putting it i there and bouncing it out as a wav, thats even more efficient. not aiff tho, thats shit compared.

No. If it's 64kbps and you render a wav, it's wav of a 64kpbs file.

drokkr wrote:No. If it's 64kbps and you render a wav, it's wav of a 64kpbs file.

but its wav, its like 1411 kbps, higher than 64 and thats what man wants

drokkr wrote:No. If it's 64kbps and you render a wav, it's wav of a 64kpbs file.

I don't know who's joking anymore

skimpi wrote:

drokkr wrote:No. If it's 64kbps and you render a wav, it's wav of a 64kpbs file.

but its wav, its like 1411 kbps, higher than 64 and thats what man wants

Shum wrote:

skimpi wrote:

drokkr wrote:No. If it's 64kbps and you render a wav, it's wav of a 64kpbs file.

but its wav, its like 1411 kbps, higher than 64 and thats what man wants

paradox!

Haha thanks guys!
So in summary, to listen to the live stream in full quality -
1) time travel to the future
2) grab the podcast
3) convert it to a WAV.
4) then travel back to current time
5) ????
6) Profit!!

Crosby wrote:Haha thanks guys!
So in summary, to listen to the live stream in full quality -
1) time travel to the future
2) grab the podcast
3) convert it to a WAV.
4) then travel back to current time
5) ????
6) Profit!!

time travel? wtf you on bro!? wavs exist now!

skimpi wrote:

Crosby wrote:Haha thanks guys!
So in summary, to listen to the live stream in full quality -
1) time travel to the future
2) grab the podcast
3) convert it to a WAV.
4) then travel back to current time
5) ????
6) Profit!!

time travel? wtf you on bro!? wavs exist now!

drokkr wrote:No. If it's 64kbps and you render a wav, it's wav of a 64kpbs file.

This

wait

so all those radio rips i cut to dub weren't actually wav files??

hutyluty wrote:wait

so all those radio rips i cut to dub weren't actually wav files??

No, when you convert a low quality format to .wav, special algorithms in most new converters upscale it and replace the missing frequencies. FACT

Pedro Sánchez wrote:No, when you convert a low quality format to .wav, special algorithms in most new converters upscale it and replace the missing frequencies. FACT

So, these "new converters" make up/imagine/pulls out of their asses these missing frequencies? How can they produce what's not there in the first place.

drokkr wrote:

Pedro Sánchez wrote:No, when you convert a low quality format to .wav, special algorithms in most new converters upscale it and replace the missing frequencies. FACT

So, these "new converters" make up/imagine/pulls out of their asses these missing frequencies? How can they produce what's not there in the first place.

Digital mate I dunno, I guess it's like how data is just 0 and 1 but if the signal is broke it knows what comes next, kind of like the healing brush in photoshop but with audio.