the difference seems to be clairaudience:
an imagined structure + undistracted execution
in contrast to the smorgasbord of sounds
that characterizes 95% of current production
please,
lets have some self-censorship
leave the cluttered electro gurgles & tinkles
out with the rubbish
the best, as always, is either exquisitely refined
or distinctively raw & untraceably derived,
requiring thought, patience & the elimination of random crap
to avoid the quicksand of indulgent dross.
Re: fresh tunage vs agglomerated sludge
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:44 pm
by fractal
i feel like this thread is a good analogy of the quicksand of indulgent dross
Re: fresh tunage vs agglomerated sludge
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:46 am
by nousd
I'm glad someone got the irony,
but then it is pretty obvious eh?
Re: fresh tunage vs agglomerated sludge
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:47 am
by Be-1ne
I like turtle
x
Re: fresh tunage vs agglomerated sludge
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 2:45 pm
by Trifficspurs
sd5 wrote:
please,
lets have some self-censorship
leave the cluttered electro gurgles & tinkles
out with the rubbish
Be-1ne wrote:I like turtle
x
........?
Re: fresh tunage vs agglomerated sludge
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 12:06 pm
by nousd
Furthermore ...
can we have the boring bits edited out.
Like, how about consideringmy jaded tastes
not just your tolerance for vacuuous repetition.
Think idrone & anti-anaesthesis.
Skim the top of it's fluff, bottom for the obvious.
Re: fresh tunage vs agglomerated sludge
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:52 pm
by Caski
Re: fresh tunage vs agglomerated sludge
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:14 am
by nousd
O
needless to say, this doesn't apply to Be-1ne or Caski
but I understand that you have to pretend to not understand what I'm saying
so as to not alienate the sludge-makers & lovers amongst us
to reiterate with an analogy:
the accretion of sound effects
without an underlying strong idea/synthesizing aesthetic
just makes diaper-disposable noise
in the same way that dabbled paint is one mix away from shit brown.
