taming unwanted frequencies

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
neonmansion
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:26 am

taming unwanted frequencies

Post by neonmansion » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:50 am

I was listening to some of my old beats and noticed that if I cranked them loud many of the elements hurt my ears. My newer stuff is much better but not perfect. I noticed that when I A/B my stuff with some of my favorite artists I can turn their music of way louder and not have it sound unpleasant. So I've been working on EQing out annoying frequencies much more.

My question is that other than sweeping a band of freq. to find a harsh freq and notch it out.. are there any other methods anyone knows about to make the mix more smooth and pleasant when it comes to harsh sounding frequencies?

e.g. any specific offending frequencies?? (i.e. 250hz on a kick drum, etc..)

User avatar
thrillion
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:52 pm
Location: Universe.

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by thrillion » Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:26 am

I think the sweeping technique is your best shot Neonmansion. Would assume there is different bad frequencies for each different sample you use.
"Wub-wub-dada-dada-fryyh-frooh-da-da-wuwuwu-wub-wubba-ba-da-da-da-fraaaackssht" x2

neonmansion
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:26 am

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by neonmansion » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:15 am

there has to be some info on frequencies that kill you're ears.. because it can't be the timbre of the instrument. I mean a really shrill piano sound and a really shrill guitar sound would both hurt your ears. I'm thinking there are some freq bands that are displeasing.

User avatar
Triphosphate
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:40 am

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Triphosphate » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:42 am

There aren't any bad frequencies, just certain frequencies that we hear better than others, and thus can be much quieter in a mix. Or alternatively, frequencies that we hear so well that they will sound 'shrill' or 'too loud' at certain volumes.

You're gonna want to refer to fletcher-Munson curves:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fletcher–Munson_curves
<-WTF hyperlink?

And here's an article I found on using eq with human percieved loudness in mind:
http://www.anstendig.org/EQ.html

I found this to be especially helpful:
When we further reduced the high frequencies in our hearing's most sensitive range between 2000 and 5000 Hz, we were able to raise the volume substantially without anyone noticing. Our conclusions are

1) that our ability to perceive changes in volume is most sensitive in the frequency ranges that we hear loudest;

2) that most of the our much-touted sensitivity to even very small volume changes is not a recognition of degrees of loudness, but rather a recognition of changes in the quality of the sound and an awareness of degrees of irritation, i.e., whether the sound becomes more or less irritating; and

3) that the known fact that our hearing is more forgiving of distortions in equalization at low volume levels than at high volume levels is due to the absence of those high frequencies that are below our threshold of hearing.
Tldr; if you turn down frequencies between 2k and 5khz you can make everything else louder without it sounding irritating.

User avatar
Shock Rx
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:20 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida
Contact:

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Shock Rx » Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:18 am

Ha! Neonmansion, I have this same struggle. A lot of this is due to shit monitors for me. What playback set up do you have? I find when I run into this problem the best soloution next to finding a replacement sample/patch is to bring in the original and layer it with the processed ones. Sidechain and eq a bit, and the result should be better. Also it is good practice to check for harsh freqs periodically as you add processing and fx. I'm still battling this issue, so my tips may be shit. I look forward to what the pros on this board have to say.

User avatar
koncide
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:08 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by koncide » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:08 pm

neonmansion wrote:I was listening to some of my old beats and noticed that if I cranked them loud many of the elements hurt my ears. My newer stuff is much better but not perfect. I noticed that when I A/B my stuff with some of my favorite artists I can turn their music of way louder and not have it sound unpleasant. So I've been working on EQing out annoying frequencies much more.

My question is that other than sweeping a band of freq. to find a harsh freq and notch it out.. are there any other methods anyone knows about to make the mix more smooth and pleasant when it comes to harsh sounding frequencies?

e.g. any specific offending frequencies?? (i.e. 250hz on a kick drum, etc..)
Trust your ears. The sweeping band technique is your best friend. General rules are very difficult to define when it comes to this sort of thing, as different degrees and types of processing produce different levels.

Once you find a band range that you think is too loud, you can either notch it (simplest) or use multiband compression to reduce it that way. Multiband compression will produce different results to a notch, whichever you think serves you better.
Melodic deepness from my mind.

Soundcloud

Future garage, free DL.

Soundcloud

https://twitter.com/Koncide
https://www.facebook.com/Koncide

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by mthrfnk » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:19 pm

De-essing doesn't have to be confined to just vocals, try it on your high pitched elements you think may be causing you problems... should tame the nasty frequencies down.
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
Sharmaji
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Contact:

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Sharmaji » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:58 pm

depends on context but 400hz-1.2khz can be muddy-to-nasal if there's too much there; 1.8-4k or so can be edgy and shrill.

aside from high and lowpassing things, tight cuts in the offending areas tend to help alot, especially as layers build up.

i definitely multiband or de-ess vox at around 2k quite often, as all the layers come into focus; there can be a huge buildup in that area that makes vocal stacks sound really shrill and awful.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK

Artie_Fufkin
Posts: 1072
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Artie_Fufkin » Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:07 pm


User avatar
bkwsk
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:48 am

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by bkwsk » Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:42 pm

Artie Fufkin wrote:
5 Minutes to a better mix is a really nice series, even if it's not focused on electronic music.

User avatar
smile
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:07 am
Location: Sweden

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by smile » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:30 am

Could be unwanted dissonances? Even "subtle" stuff like using punchy drums that are off-key and interferes with lows/mids can cause some problems.

VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by VirtualMark » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:41 am

Adding distortion can often cause nasty resonances. Like mthrfnk said, a de-esser can work wonders. Fabfilter's one is great, very easy to use.

Also dynamic eq's are great - more accurate than a multiband compressor, you can dial in a narrow q and just compress the offending frequencies. This is sometimes more desirable than using a standard eq, as it only attenuates the frequencies when they get too loud.

User avatar
bkwsk
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:48 am

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by bkwsk » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:10 am

smile wrote:Could be unwanted dissonances? Even "subtle" stuff like using punchy drums that are off-key and interferes with lows/mids can cause some problems.
Off-key kickdrums aren't usually an issue if they're fairly short and not 808-based. Bongos, toms et al. are a completely different thing.

Augment
Posts: 1932
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:59 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Augment » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:51 pm

I've heard that Noisia bitchruses/distorts some of the higher frequencies so they don't hurt your ear when you turn the volume up, not sure how this works
aka blinkesko
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)

Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Genevieve » Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:45 pm

Artie Fufkin wrote:
I just removed some 2k on a kick where I heavily boosted it (-core/gabber kick) and it sounds a lot more focused now :0 way better. Thanks 4 dis /subscribes
Image

namsayin

:'0

mthrfnk
Posts: 2731
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by mthrfnk » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:31 pm

blinkesko wrote:I've heard that Noisia bitchruses/distorts some of the higher frequencies so they don't hurt your ear when you turn the volume up, not sure how this works
I remember someone posting this a while back, again still not sure what the actual theory/truth behind this is.
My newest music:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

User avatar
Triphosphate
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:40 am

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Triphosphate » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:50 pm

mthrfnk wrote:
blinkesko wrote:I've heard that Noisia bitchruses/distorts some of the higher frequencies so they don't hurt your ear when you turn the volume up, not sure how this works
I remember someone posting this a while back, again still not sure what the actual theory/truth behind this is.
Maybe distressing? (LPF followed by bitcrushing) Otherwise I can only imagine this builds up more high frequencies?

Augment
Posts: 1932
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:59 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Augment » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:54 pm


8:50
Coming from Camo & Krooked, I think I'll experiment a bit with this later
aka blinkesko
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)

Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose

Artie_Fufkin
Posts: 1072
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by Artie_Fufkin » Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:25 pm

Genevieve wrote:I just removed some 2k on a kick where I heavily boosted it (-core/gabber kick) and it sounds a lot more focused now :0 way better. Thanks 4 dis /subscribes
No, you put that back right now! Gabber kicks are supposed to be fatiguing! :twisted: :cornlol:

twilitez
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:04 am

Re: taming unwanted frequencies

Post by twilitez » Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:12 pm

blinkesko wrote:
8:50
Coming from Camo & Krooked, I think I'll experiment a bit with this later
Dont like reading subtitles but it is definitely worth it, these guys know what theyre doing.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests