[POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked

Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Serial
0
No votes
Parallel
3
12%
They both have their uses
22
88%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
JorgyTheGreat
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:39 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

[POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by JorgyTheGreat » Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:16 pm

Which do you prefer? And why?

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by wub » Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:17 pm

Both have their uses.

User avatar
JorgyTheGreat
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:39 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by JorgyTheGreat » Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:19 pm

I know but some people have their preferences to use one over the other and that's the basis of this post.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by wub » Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:23 pm

I am aware of that, and was replying with my opinion on the matter.


You could always incorporate a poll in the OP to find out people's choice?

User avatar
JorgyTheGreat
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:39 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Re: Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by JorgyTheGreat » Mon Jan 14, 2013 2:33 pm

Ohh. I gotcha. Sorry I didn't catch that. I wasn't sure on how to do that but I see that one was made.

Kit Fysto
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:31 am

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by Kit Fysto » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:11 pm

This is like asking beer or wine. I like both for different reasons.
Soundcloud
New EP Trailer ^

User avatar
JFK
Posts: 3123
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:48 am

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by JFK » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:58 pm

Parallel on drums, serial on errr ting else.

bassinine
Posts: 799
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:38 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by bassinine » Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:21 pm

JFK wrote:Parallel on drums, serial on errr ting else.

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by Genevieve » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:07 pm

Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
Image

namsayin

:'0

bassinine
Posts: 799
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:38 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by bassinine » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:08 pm

Genevieve wrote:Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
he means just putting it directly in the chain on the channel your working with.

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by hasezwei » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:09 pm

Genevieve wrote:Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
yea.
use the first one to tame the peaks, then send the signal into the second one which is most likely one that has a nice character but would start pumping if you didn't catch the peaks with the first one.
bassinine wrote: he means just putting it directly in the chain on the channel your working with.
well then he's using the wrong words :lol:

bassinine
Posts: 799
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:38 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by bassinine » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:11 pm

hasezwei wrote:
Genevieve wrote:Serial is one slightly compressed signal into another compressor?
yea.
use the first one to tame the peaks, then send the signal into the second one which is most likely one that has a nice character but would start pumping if you didn't catch the peaks with the first one.
bassinine wrote: he means just putting it directly in the chain on the channel your working with.
well then he's using the wrong words :lol:
Yeah, but you all are right. It's basically parallel compression on one channel. Light into heavy comp.

shakas
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:49 pm
Location: southern california

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by shakas » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:55 pm

question: if i had a compressor with a dry/wet knob on it...and i pulled the knob to about 50% or whatever. would that now be parallel compression ?

User avatar
OfficialDAPT
Posts: 1477
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:51 am

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by OfficialDAPT » Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:12 pm

shakas wrote:question: if i had a compressor with a dry/wet knob on it...and i pulled the knob to about 50% or whatever. would that now be parallel compression ?
Technically, I think so, but I tend to think of parallel as 100% dry with extra compressed signal running along side (parallel) of the dry. It's purpose is to retain some dynamics of the original sound but also make it more full or fat.
7 year old BROstep/Trapstep/Chillstep producer from India. Young. Talented. 7 Years Old. Super skilled for age. Signed to NOW22. Biography written in 3rd person on soundcloud OBVI. The next Skrillex. Wait I don't even like him anymore LOL. Super talented. Only 6 years old.

bassinine
Posts: 799
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:38 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by bassinine » Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:21 pm

OfficialDAPT wrote:
shakas wrote:question: if i had a compressor with a dry/wet knob on it...and i pulled the knob to about 50% or whatever. would that now be parallel compression ?
Technically, I think so, but I tend to think of parallel as 100% dry with extra compressed signal running along side (parallel) of the dry. It's purpose is to retain some dynamics of the original sound but also make it more full or fat.
i mean, yeah, that would be parallel. unless the compressor processes the dry signal is some way... some compressors will color the sound a bit if i'm not mistaken.

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by hasezwei » Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:26 pm

the benefit of setting up a separate channel for parallel compression would be that you're able to process the dry and wet signal differently, with an eq for example

User avatar
lloydy
Posts: 2439
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by lloydy » Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:22 pm

JFK wrote:Parallel on drums, serial on errr ting else.
New Dnb track
Soundcloud

Free Download
Soundcloud

Hashkey
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 3:30 pm

Re: [POLL] Serial VS. Parallel compression...

Post by Hashkey » Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:31 pm

1176 into la2a :D

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests