Page 1 of 3

Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:10 pm
by OGLemon
http://personality-testing.info/tests/MACH-IV.php
I'm not sure how good the test is, but I got 70/100.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:13 pm
by m8son666
Your score was 80 of 100.

This puts you in the category of the high Machs, people who do not belive in the goodness of the world and that because that it must be manipulated, people who Machiavelli would approve of.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:32 pm
by Harkat
yeah man, masons an empty hole of a human being

big ups

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:33 pm
by m8son666
you won't be saying that when i am millionaire CEO

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:38 pm
by wub
I scored 100.

Most of my working day is spent telling people what they want to hear in order to get what i need doing done. Not proud of the fact, but I'm far from ashamed.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:41 pm
by Harkat
m8son wrote:you won't be saying that when i am millionaire CEO
Bruv I'll be sitting my drum circle, having found nirvana. And I'll know no amount of yachts or secretary blowjobs can match that.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:54 pm
by Harkat
Also I was 59 but I reckon this is more of a philosophical question than a personality test. I mean, I know most people are not brave, or will only work hard when forced to, but that question says nothing about my morals.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:00 pm
by Nihilism
Your score was 69 of 100.

This puts you in the category of the high Machs, people who do not belive in the goodness of the world and that because that it must be manipulated, people who Machiavelli would approve of

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:01 pm
by m8son666
This is less a test of personality, more one of naivety.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:10 pm
by Harkat
Well I think being manipulative is wrong, it has nothing to do with wether it's materially beneficial, it's a question of morals. I'm not naive to think that.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:11 pm
by m8son666
You're naive to think there are such things as morals lol

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:16 pm
by Harkat
we've had this discussion and you were wrong, remember.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:18 pm
by m8son666
Actually i was right.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:37 pm
by ehbes
46

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:02 pm
by ultraspatial
Your score was 86 of 100.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:06 pm
by rickyarbino
57
This puts you in the category of the low Machs, people who will hold out for the goodness of the world and avoid manipulation. Not the people Machiavelli would approve of.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:06 pm
by Harkat
that surprises me coming from jess "rape" lem

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:15 pm
by ultraspatial

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:48 pm
by rockonin
Your score was 68 of 100.

This puts you in the category of the high Machs, people who do not belive in the goodness of the world and that because that it must be manipulated, people who Machiavelli would approve of.

Re: Machiavellianism Test

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:15 pm
by AxeD
What is naive is to think that you manipulating others would help move anything forward.