'twas expected: fappening backfires

jrkhnds · Post by **jrkhnds** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:34 pm

so, you guys heard about the "emmayouarenext"-website, displaying a countdown and threatening to leak more nudes? well, it was a marketing stunt. by these guys: http://www.rantic.com/

Rantic wrote:Dear Barack Obama,

" We have been hired by celebrity publicists to bring this disgusting issue to attention. The recent 4chan celebrity nude leaks in the past 2 months have been an invasion of privacy and is also clear indication that the internet NEEDS to be censored. Every Facebook like, share & Twitter mention will count as a social signature -- and will be one step closer to shutting down www.4chan.org. "

Sincerely,
Rantic.com

wub · Post by **wub** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:42 pm

I see what they've done. I just don't see why they've done it.

OGLemon · Post by **OGLemon** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:43 pm

more censorship!

I can't stand reactionaries

RKM · Post by **RKM** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:49 pm

im sure emma watson's q gassed to be part of this noble campaign

wub · Post by **wub** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:50 pm

So they tried to frame 4Chan in an effort to push through more online censorship? Or just to get 4Chan taken down?

lloydnoise · Post by **lloydnoise** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:52 pm

so, let me get this str8

some douche who owns fake news websites hired a pr company to promote his fake release of some non-existant pictures as a 4chan staunt in order to discredit 4chan and bring ad revenue to his fake news sites that broke the story in the first place..?

ffs
775

jrkhnds · Post by **jrkhnds** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:53 pm

both, I guess? taking down 4chan being the first step.

lloydnoise · Post by **lloydnoise** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:55 pm

wub wrote:So they tried to frame 4Chan in an effort to push through more online censorship? Or just to get 4Chan taken down?

i thjink theyre panicking as they tried to set 4cvhan up and now 10000000 btards are after them (him?)

wub · Post by **wub** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:56 pm

So the guy just had a vendetta against 4Chan? Seems like an awful lot of effort to go through to try and get a site taken down.

jrkhnds · Post by **jrkhnds** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:57 pm

especially since realistically there's not much of a chance for it to actually happen.

lloydnoise · Post by **lloydnoise** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:04 pm

wub wrote:So the guy just had a vendetta against 4Chan? Seems like an awful lot of effort to go through to try and get a site taken down.

i think the guy owns a bunch of fake news sites and got introuble before for nicking content from BBC/CNN etc. i guess he didnt think the whole thing through and now hes at war with lots of angry anonz

CreamLord · Post by **CreamLord** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:17 pm

Can't use every view and share as a social signature though can you? Especially if people thought it was one thing then it turned out to be something completely different

AxeD · Post by **AxeD** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:09 pm

"Every Facebook like, share & Twitter mention will count as a social signature".

i.e.: Making up the rules while the game has already started.

wub · Post by **wub** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:17 pm

Nu-uh! I'm wearing everything proof armour!

ehbes · Post by **ehbes** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:20 pm

if theres one group of neckbeards i dont want to piss off, its the neckbeard hackers on 4chan.

Forum · Post by **Forum** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:22 pm

More importantly, Emma Watson still looks like a young boy

wub · Post by **wub** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:22 pm

Forum wrote:More importantly, Emma Watson still looks like a young boy

"I happen to like 8-year-old boys"

jrkhnds · Post by **jrkhnds** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:10 pm

every big up! in this thread is a electronic signature towards legalising Forum's (southstar's) demand for 8yo boys.

ehbes · Post by **ehbes** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:13 pm

jrkhnds wrote:every big up! in this thread is a electronic signature towards legalising Ketamine's demand for 8yo boys.

fixed

nowaysj · Post by **nowaysj** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:14 pm

wub wrote:
Forum wrote:More importantly, Emma Watson still looks like a young boy
"I happen to like 8-year-old boys"

'twas expected: fappening backfires

'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires

Who is online