Page 1 of 2
'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:34 pm
by jrkhnds
so, you guys heard about the "emmayouarenext"-website, displaying a countdown and threatening to leak more nudes? well, it was a marketing stunt. by these guys:
http://www.rantic.com/
Rantic wrote:Dear Barack Obama,
" We have been hired by celebrity publicists to bring this disgusting issue to attention. The recent 4chan celebrity nude leaks in the past 2 months have been an invasion of privacy and is also clear indication that the internet NEEDS to be censored. Every Facebook like, share & Twitter mention will count as a social signature -- and will be one step closer to shutting down
www.4chan.org. "
Sincerely,
Rantic.com
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:42 pm
by wub
I see what they've done. I just don't see why they've done it.
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:43 pm
by OGLemon
more censorship!
I can't stand reactionaries

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:49 pm
by RKM
im sure emma watson's q gassed to be part of this noble campaign
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:50 pm
by wub
So they tried to frame 4Chan in an effort to push through more online censorship? Or just to get 4Chan taken down?
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:52 pm
by lloydnoise
so, let me get this str8
some douche who owns fake news websites hired a pr company to promote his fake release of some non-existant pictures as a 4chan staunt in order to discredit 4chan and bring ad revenue to his fake news sites that broke the story in the first place..?
ffs
775

Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:53 pm
by jrkhnds
both, I guess? taking down 4chan being the first step.
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:55 pm
by lloydnoise
wub wrote:So they tried to frame 4Chan in an effort to push through more online censorship? Or just to get 4Chan taken down?
i thjink theyre panicking as they tried to set 4cvhan up and now 10000000 btards are after them (him?)
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:56 pm
by wub
So the guy just had a vendetta against 4Chan? Seems like an awful lot of effort to go through to try and get a site taken down.
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:57 pm
by jrkhnds
especially since realistically there's not much of a chance for it to actually happen.
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:04 pm
by lloydnoise
wub wrote:So the guy just had a vendetta against 4Chan? Seems like an awful lot of effort to go through to try and get a site taken down.
i think the guy owns a bunch of fake news sites and got introuble before for nicking content from BBC/CNN etc. i guess he didnt think the whole thing through and now hes at war with lots of angry anonz
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:17 pm
by CreamLord
Can't use every view and share as a social signature though can you? Especially if people thought it was one thing then it turned out to be something completely different
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:09 pm
by AxeD
"Every Facebook like, share & Twitter mention will count as a social signature".
i.e.: Making up the rules while the game has already started.
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:17 pm
by wub
Nu-uh! I'm wearing everything proof armour!
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:20 pm
by ehbes
if theres one group of neckbeards i dont want to piss off, its the neckbeard hackers on 4chan.
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:22 pm
by Forum
More importantly, Emma Watson still looks like a young boy
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:22 pm
by wub
Forum wrote:More importantly, Emma Watson still looks like a young boy
"I happen to like 8-year-old boys"
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:10 pm
by jrkhnds
every big up! in this thread is a electronic signature towards legalising Forum's (southstar's) demand for 8yo boys.
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:13 pm
by ehbes
jrkhnds wrote:every big up! in this thread is a electronic signature towards legalising Ketamine's demand for 8yo boys.
fixed
Re: 'twas expected: fappening backfires
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:14 pm
by nowaysj
wub wrote:Forum wrote:More importantly, Emma Watson still looks like a young boy
"I happen to like 8-year-old boys"
