Bass keeps smoothering the rest of the track..
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- fullyrecordingz
- Posts: 920
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:20 pm
- Location: LONDON CITY
Bass keeps smoothering the rest of the track..
I need everyones advice on this problem. everytime my bass keeps smotherin the rest of the tune, and it aint even that loud, its like it sqashes out any other noise.
It is the frenquency of the bass? the wrong equalizin?
any1 got any tips on how 2 deal wiv this problem?
It is the frenquency of the bass? the wrong equalizin?
any1 got any tips on how 2 deal wiv this problem?
-
ramadanman
- Posts: 2924
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:10 pm
- fullyrecordingz
- Posts: 920
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:20 pm
- Location: LONDON CITY
are you using cubase because the default compression on there tends to be good in my experience
make sure the bass isn't too loud, make it mono, and like ramadanman said make sure the synth/sampler is set to be monophonic so that tones don't overlap and mud up
if it still sounds crappy then you should use a different sound/sample
make sure the bass isn't too loud, make it mono, and like ramadanman said make sure the synth/sampler is set to be monophonic so that tones don't overlap and mud up
if it still sounds crappy then you should use a different sound/sample
- jtransition
- >>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: London
- fullyrecordingz
- Posts: 920
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:20 pm
- Location: LONDON CITY
- jtransition
- >>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: London
I do not want to bore you with my history but it was not so long ago that i was trying to build tunes in my home studio (witch consited of a sampler a Atari 1040ste, a 12 channel desk,a dat machine,a Behringer compressor,and a Klark Teknic reverb) I listened to a couple of old dats last year and my mixes were quite rubbish i mean all over the place.No one is born great we just have to try our best to become great.Anyway gotta get back into the lab cos my next appointment has just arrived.FullyRecordingz wrote:safe J, lol we aint all masters like some
yer what ekaj saidekaj wrote:EQ out anything below 30-40hz on any sound on your track, especially kicks and pads. Basically this will take out any frequencies that are not needed in other sounds. No other sounds should have sub frequencies in them except your bass.
Try that and then you may find your bass is a little clearer.
and j in simple terms
keep off the brown paint ^^
OI..YOU..are you gonna flash bang doe...
-
narcossist
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:21 pm
filtering will fix it i reckon bro, not just the subsonics like ekaj mentioned but also all the bumph further up the spectrum. setup a low pass filter [or shelf it on an eq] just on yr bass an move it down til the problem clears but you've still got enough bass to shake some walls. Sure you know that everything else is generally from 200hz up [apart from the kick and some of the weight in heavy snares] so if you do the inverse to the rest of the mix [high pass it] things will prob sound a lot cleaner but watch for makin it too clean.
Re the eqing: 400hz is mud, 250hz generally sounds ghenk and taking out shit in the 60hz to 100hz bit can be really effective if you get it right. Did a presentation at college about Dillinja's sub on the "angels fell" and theres a fuckin huge gap between the sub at 40hz and his kick at 80hz. Another tip is load up some real heavy track in cool edit and use a spectrum analyser to check how it compares to yr track.
Think compression on the bass was mentioned which will keep it at the same place in the mix, watch out for too much on the master [i never go any deeper than -4db on the threshhold or 4:1 or the ratio] as it'll just squash everything together and make the loud elements double loud if that makes sense.
Hope thats some use mate, sorry for repeating what everyone else said basically but couldn't think of another way of explaining it.
Re the eqing: 400hz is mud, 250hz generally sounds ghenk and taking out shit in the 60hz to 100hz bit can be really effective if you get it right. Did a presentation at college about Dillinja's sub on the "angels fell" and theres a fuckin huge gap between the sub at 40hz and his kick at 80hz. Another tip is load up some real heavy track in cool edit and use a spectrum analyser to check how it compares to yr track.
Think compression on the bass was mentioned which will keep it at the same place in the mix, watch out for too much on the master [i never go any deeper than -4db on the threshhold or 4:1 or the ratio] as it'll just squash everything together and make the loud elements double loud if that makes sense.
Hope thats some use mate, sorry for repeating what everyone else said basically but couldn't think of another way of explaining it.
- jtransition
- >>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: London
narcossist wrote:filtering will fix it i reckon bro, not just the subsonics like ekaj mentioned but also all the bumph further up the spectrum. setup a low pass filter [or shelf it on an eq] just on yr bass an move it down til the problem clears but you've still got enough bass to shake some walls. Sure you know that everything else is generally from 200hz up [apart from the kick and some of the weight in heavy snares] so if you do the inverse to the rest of the mix [high pass it] things will prob sound a lot cleaner but watch for makin it too clean.
Re the eqing: 400hz is mud, 250hz generally sounds ghenk and taking out shit in the 60hz to 100hz bit can be really effective if you get it right. Did a presentation at college about Dillinja's sub on the "angels fell" and theres a fuckin huge gap between the sub at 40hz and his kick at 80hz. Another tip is load up some real heavy track in cool edit and use a spectrum analyser to check how it compares to yr track.
Think compression on the bass was mentioned which will keep it at the same place in the mix, watch out for too much on the master [i never go any deeper than -4db on the threshhold or 4:1 or the ratio] as it'll just squash everything together and make the loud elements double loud if that makes sense.
Hope thats some use mate, sorry for repeating what everyone else said basically but couldn't think of another way of explaining it.
When i suggested looking at a mix like you would a painting what i was trying to say in a roundabout way was that if you choose your sounds carefully you will not have this problem.I do not think you can talk about high or low pass filters or which frequency to cut or boost without listening to the track and please stay away from specrum analysers at this stage (whilst these can be very usefull tools they encourage mental laziness which will hold you back in the long term)
Jason
keep all verbs off bass ..avoid muddyness.
http://www.myspace.com/ZOMBYproductions
http://www.myspace.com/HEAVYARTILLERYLABEL

'SPLIFF DUB' OUT SOON !!!!
http://www.myspace.com/HEAVYARTILLERYLABEL

'SPLIFF DUB' OUT SOON !!!!
-
narcossist
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:21 pm
yeah very true, haha i'm not really in a positon to dispute any of what you've written man. was just eating my lunch trying to think how best Fully could get round his bass problem by giving a few very loose pointers.Jtransition wrote:
When i suggested looking at a mix like you would a painting what i was trying to say in a roundabout way was that if you choose your sounds carefully you will not have this problem.I do not think you can talk about high or low pass filters or which frequency to cut or boost without listening to the track and please stay away from specrum analysers at this stage (whilst these can be very usefull tools they encourage mental laziness which will hold you back in the long term)
Jason
- fullyrecordingz
- Posts: 920
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:20 pm
- Location: LONDON CITY
I disagree, I use mine all the time to look at professional tracks, how they are constructed, where things sit in the mix. it's really helped me have a deeper understanding of music. i suppose this is why i see music as i listen nowadays, an i dont even blaze !Jtransition wrote:please stay away from specrum analysers at this stage (whilst these can be very usefull tools they encourage mental laziness which will hold you back in the long term)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests